Mars Sample Return |
Mars Sample Return |
Apr 7 2006, 07:32 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 370 Joined: 12-September 05 From: France Member No.: 495 |
Next phase reached in definition of Mars Sample Return mission
http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMJAGNFGLE_index_0.html |
|
|
May 6 2024, 10:38 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2519 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
https://spacenews.com/practical-approach-ma...return-mission/
Worth a read, but I'm skeptical of Zubrin's 50-kg total mass Earth return vehicle. And even if the delta V numbers work out in the abstract, he presupposes all the planetary protection requirements can be made to go away. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
May 7 2024, 02:56 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 236 Joined: 14-January 22 Member No.: 9140 |
Interesting and unexpected bogeyman that he identifies and eliminates. Agreed that it is probably not going to be so simple to just wish that requirement away.
I wonder if – if – that is such a large part of the cost, if it could be reduced by moving the point of defense from Mars to Earth: Allow a no-planetary-protection return capsule to leave Mars, come to Earth orbit, and then get protected while in Earth orbit. That still sounds expensive and Rube Goldberg-ish, but would seem to be sub-billions. Zubrin loves to cut the Gordian Knot. But this particular knot is there for a reason. |
|
|
May 7 2024, 04:04 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2519 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
Allow a no-planetary-protection return capsule to leave Mars, come to Earth orbit, and then get protected while in Earth orbit. No, I don't think this helps. Getting into Earth orbit is either risky (aerocapture) or very expensive in terms of delta V. Unless there is some exotic propulsion system or some complex chaotic trajectory. And once you had it in Earth orbit, then what? His ISRU solution handwaves the difficulty and complexity of making and storing the propellant, but at least it has slightly better mass margins. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th June 2024 - 02:04 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |