IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Invoking The Voyagers Against Id
ljk4-1
post Oct 24 2005, 03:04 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2454
Joined: 8-July 05
From: NGC 5907
Member No.: 430



Cornell President Rawlings Condemns Intelligent Design

Drawing from sources ranging from Cornell's founders to Voyager
space missions, Interim President Hunter R. Rawlings III condemned
the push to teach intelligent design in public schools Friday. The
attack came during the president's State of...

http://www.cornellsun.com/vnews/display.v/...4/435c7762cf891


"The desire to understand the world and the desire to reform it are the two great engines of progress." - Bertrand Russell


--------------------
"After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance.
I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard,
and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does
not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is
indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have
no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft."

- Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
dvandorn
post Nov 18 2005, 08:30 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



Well, yeah, a black hole would be the only thing that would have the raw power to strip material off of a neutron star. But I have serious questions as to what the process of such mass-stripping would look like -- it would seem to me that it would be so difficult to get fragments of a neutron star to break off of their parent body that it would tend to retain its cohesion until after it was safely within the Schwartzchild radius of the black hole...

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Richard Trigaux_*
post Nov 18 2005, 08:47 PM
Post #3





Guests






QUOTE (dvandorn @ Nov 18 2005, 08:30 PM)
Well, yeah, a black hole would be the only thing that would have the raw power to strip material off of a neutron star.  But I have serious questions as to what the process of such mass-stripping would look like -- it would seem to me that it would be so difficult to get fragments of a neutron star to break off of their parent body that it would tend to retain its cohesion until after it was safely within the Schwartzchild radius of the black hole...

-the other Doug
*


Not sure. remember that a neutron star is about the same radius than the Schwartzchild sphere of a small black hole. So we can imagine that part of it is in, while most of it is still out. But at this stage, anyway, the complete coalescence is within some minutes or seconds of time, and the orbit is even no more circular, it is chaotic (and still more chaotic if the black hole rotates). So we can imagine that the neutron star is eaten by bits, each times it gets close enough.

Anyway a neutron star is something extremely solid, but even this solidity is very weak in front of its gravitation. I am sure, there are some known example of "neutron star quakes" which occur when the rotation speed changes, and the shapes changes from more to less elliptic. So the gravitation of a neutron star is much stronger that its material solidity. Anyway a hand into the Schwartzchild sphere and the remainder of the body out, nothing can resist to this.

We can imagine this tremendous catastrophe: each stripping is an enormous burst of energy, a series of cracks for some seconds before the remainder of the neutron star is swallowed, or it explodes from having no more enough gravitation left to resist the tremendous pressure of the neutronic matter.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Nov 19 2005, 01:10 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Nov 19 2005, 07:47 AM)
Not sure. remember that a neutron star is about the same radius than the Schwartzchild sphere of a small black hole. So we can imagine that part of it is in, while most of it is still out. But at this stage, anyway, the complete coalescence is within some minutes or seconds of time, and the orbit is even no more circular, it is chaotic (and still more chaotic if the black hole rotates). So we can imagine that the neutron star is eaten by bits, each times it gets close enough.
*


Note that orbits within about 3 Rs are unstable (allthough this can be less in a Kerr (rotating) black hole. So I don't really think we can imagine an orbit with part of the neutron star inside the Event horizon. blink.gif

QUOTE
Anyway a neutron star is something extremely solid, but even this solidity is very weak in front of its gravitation. I am sure, there are some known example of "neutron star quakes" which occur when the rotation speed changes, and the shapes changes from more to less elliptic. So the gravitation of a neutron star is much stronger that its material solidity. Anyway a hand into the Schwartzchild sphere and the remainder of the body out, nothing can resist to this.
*


Neuton stars are not "extremely solid" on the contrary most of there interior is superfluid. Only the crust is solid which is where the quakes occur, when, as you say the shape of the star changes.

QUOTE
We can imagine this tremendous catastrophe: each stripping is an enormous burst of energy, a series of cracks for some seconds before the remainder of the neutron star is swallowed, or it explodes from having no more enough gravitation left to resist the tremendous pressure of the neutronic matter.
*


I'm not in a position to think about this much at the moment (a cold is stopping my brain from working!) but my first guess would be that the NS would be consumed pretty much whole. The only other scenario I can think of would be where tidal effects stretch the star so such an extent that gravity is no longer able to hold it together (like as been said above) however I don't think this likley for the following reasons:

1) NS's are really small so you would need one hell of a tidal force in the first place.
2) NS's hold there shape really well, these are objects that can rotate 100's of times per second and still stay together in a roughly sperical shape so an even higher gradient is needed.
3) for this to work the NS would have to be tidally locked to the BH this is hard due to the very good level of symmetry of the NS and the high rotation rate.
4) the NS would have to be fairly close to the lower mass limit which (I think) is probably quite rare.

I just don't think the gravitational gradient is strong enough to do this, even within the last stable orbit of a BH. (Note no calculations done to justify all this, just belef wink.gif )

James


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Richard Trigaux_*
post Nov 19 2005, 12:33 PM
Post #5





Guests






QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Nov 19 2005, 01:10 AM)
Note that orbits within about 3 Rs are unstable (allthough this can be less in a Kerr (rotating) black hole. So I don't really think we can imagine an orbit with part of the neutron star inside the Event horizon.  blink.gif
Neuton stars are not "extremely solid" on the contrary most of there interior is superfluid. Only the crust is solid which is where the quakes occur, when, as you say the shape of the star changes.
I'm not in a position to think about this much at the moment (a cold is stopping my brain from working!) but my first guess would be that the NS would be consumed pretty much whole. The only other scenario I can think of would be where tidal effects stretch the star so such an extent that gravity is no longer able to hold it together (like as been said above) however I don't think this likley for the following reasons:

1) NS's are really small so you would need one hell of a tidal force in the first place.
2) NS's hold there shape really well, these are objects that can rotate 100's of times per second and still stay together in a roughly sperical shape so an even higher gradient is needed.
3) for this to work the NS would have to be tidally locked to the BH this is hard due to the very good level of symmetry of the NS and the high rotation rate.
4) the NS would have to be fairly close to the lower mass limit which (I think) is probably quite rare.

I just don't think the gravitational gradient is strong enough to do this, even within the last stable orbit of a BH. (Note no calculations done to justify all this, just belef wink.gif )

James
*


Neutron stars hold their shape from gravitation which treats them as if they were fluid, even the super-resistant crust. In the case of super fast rotating neutron star, they keep from flying appart from the intense gravitation field, not from the resistance of the crust.

The phenomenon of the black hole stripping the neutron star would take place during some seconds, during the very last chaotic orbits. The smaller the black hole, the better the chance for this scenario (a giant galactic black hole would swallow the neutron star at once and entirely). Especially that neutron stars are often larger than black holes. Anyway the gravitation field and gradient of a black hole is larger than the one of a neutron star, so that there are many chances to see the neutron star split even in the case it comes straight ahead on the black hole.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Nov 19 2005, 01:03 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Nov 19 2005, 06:33 AM)
Neutron stars hold their shape from gravitation which treats them as if they were fluid, even the super-resistant crust. In the case of super fast rotating neutron star, they keep from flying appart from the intense gravitation field, not from the resistance of the crust.
*

That's what I meant when I said that I didn't think a neutron star would lose its cohesiveness enough to allow significant amounts of matter to be stripped. I wasn't thinking in terms of a solid body that couldn't be broken -- I was thinking of the gravitation holding it so tightly together that the only way anything, including a black hole, could tear it apart would be for the neutron star to barrel into the black hole -- and that the neutron star would be "swallowed" before any significant amount of mass could be stripped.

I say again, I'd want to see what the process of stripping mass off of a neutron star would look like. And, for something as incredibly dense and difficult to break pieces off of as a neutron star, would the Roche limit actually occur inside the Schwartzchild radius of the black hole? My gut feeling is that it would -- the neutron star, I think, ends up getting swallowed whole no matter what you do...

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Richard Trigaux_*
post Nov 19 2005, 09:11 PM
Post #7





Guests






dvandorn, I think only a calculus or simulation would tell us what scenario is possible, the neutron star swallowed at a whole, or it being stripped during the last chaotic orbits around the black hole. My personnal inclination is for the second scenario, but...


if it is stripped, the result may be tremendous. The surface of a neutron star is relatively cold, while the inner fluid are at million degrees or more. So exposing it at the surface may produce burst of gamma rays. There is an example of this, a relatively close neutron star (around 400 light-years) had a small adjustment of shape, allowing liquid to come on the surface. This only produced enough gamma rays and X rays to disturb Earth's ionosphere and affect radio transmissions! So tearing a neutron star may be a really horrible thing...

By the way, neutron stars are cooling, and in the proces they may have plate tectonics, volcanoes, etc. Or they have not, due to the solidity of the outer crust, and they cool only by heat diffusion through this crust.

And the inner fluid? It surely undergoes some convection. And magnetic lines, etc. like in Earth's core.

And superfast neutron stars, what shape do they get? Ellipsoids? peanuts? or more complex? How do they adjust their shape?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- ljk4-1   Invoking The Voyagers Against Id   Oct 24 2005, 03:04 PM
- - djellison   Eeek - not sure I like where this thread will end ...   Oct 24 2005, 03:46 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (djellison @ Oct 24 2005, 03:46 PM)Eeek...   Oct 24 2005, 06:08 PM
|- - OWW   QUOTE (djellison @ Oct 24 2005, 03:46 PM)Play...   Oct 30 2005, 11:41 AM
|- - helvick   QUOTE (OWW @ Oct 30 2005, 12:41 PM)In 2032 th...   Oct 30 2005, 01:48 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (OWW @ Oct 30 2005, 11:41 AM)Is this ni...   Oct 30 2005, 02:16 PM
|- - dvandorn   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Oct 30 2005, 09:16 A...   Oct 30 2005, 02:38 PM
|- - helvick   QUOTE (dvandorn @ Oct 30 2005, 03:38 PM)But, ...   Oct 30 2005, 04:43 PM
- - Richard Trigaux   Ah, discution starts to heat, good. (Not a problem...   Oct 30 2005, 06:55 PM
- - Richard Trigaux   I would add that, to somewhat recenter the topic o...   Oct 30 2005, 07:30 PM
|- - helvick   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Oct 30 2005, 08:30 P...   Oct 30 2005, 08:46 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   Considering the number of accidents, cock-ups and ...   Oct 30 2005, 10:25 PM
||- - helvick   QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Oct 30 2005, 11:25 PM)Er......   Oct 30 2005, 10:51 PM
||- - ljk4-1   QUOTE (helvick @ Oct 30 2005, 05:51 PM)Not qu...   Oct 31 2005, 02:36 PM
||- - ljk4-1   A little more speculation: What if our Universe...   Oct 31 2005, 02:44 PM
||- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Oct 31 2005, 02:44 PM)A ...   Oct 31 2005, 07:09 PM
||- - ljk4-1   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Oct 31 2005, 02:09 P...   Oct 31 2005, 07:32 PM
||- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Oct 31 2005, 07:32 PM)I ...   Oct 31 2005, 07:43 PM
|- - dvandorn   QUOTE (helvick @ Oct 30 2005, 03:46 PM)...Lik...   Oct 31 2005, 02:27 AM
||- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (dvandorn @ Oct 31 2005, 02:27 AM)Actua...   Oct 31 2005, 08:27 AM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (helvick @ Oct 30 2005, 08:46 PM)Spirit...   Oct 31 2005, 07:59 AM
- - mike   All thinking is circular.   Oct 30 2005, 11:18 PM
- - djellison   We used to have this 'purpose' discussion ...   Oct 31 2005, 08:37 AM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (djellison @ Oct 31 2005, 08:37 AM)We u...   Oct 31 2005, 10:19 AM
|- - Jeff7   QUOTE (djellison @ Oct 31 2005, 03:37 AM)We u...   Oct 31 2005, 04:01 PM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (djellison @ Oct 31 2005, 01:37 AM)but ...   Oct 31 2005, 05:55 PM
|- - chris   QUOTE (djellison @ Oct 31 2005, 08:37 AM).......   Oct 31 2005, 06:22 PM
- - mike   I think that quite simply all reality is experienc...   Oct 31 2005, 04:02 PM
- - djellison   I understand that - but the question remains - WHY...   Oct 31 2005, 06:23 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (djellison @ Oct 31 2005, 06:23 PM)I un...   Oct 31 2005, 06:42 PM
- - mike   If it weren't for all these 'evil wretches...   Oct 31 2005, 08:22 PM
|- - ljk4-1   Vatican cardinal said Thursday the faithful should...   Nov 4 2005, 04:30 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Nov 4 2005, 04:30 PM)Vat...   Nov 4 2005, 08:38 PM
- - mike   Yeah, they say that now, now that virtually everyo...   Nov 4 2005, 06:13 PM
|- - ljk4-1   QUOTE (mike @ Nov 4 2005, 01:13 PM)Yeah, they...   Nov 4 2005, 07:04 PM
|- - ljk4-1   For details on the Trial of Galileo, see here: ht...   Nov 4 2005, 07:07 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Nov 4 2005, 07:04 PM)Yes...   Nov 4 2005, 08:04 PM
- - mike   I don't feel I've researched enough about ...   Nov 4 2005, 08:28 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (mike @ Nov 4 2005, 08:28 PM)Regardless...   Nov 4 2005, 09:02 PM
|- - dvandorn   QUOTE (mike @ Nov 4 2005, 02:28 PM)There are ...   Nov 5 2005, 09:12 AM
- - mike   There actually have been some studies on near-deat...   Nov 4 2005, 10:59 PM
- - mike   If there is indeed a singular God, I'd rather ...   Nov 5 2005, 07:38 PM
|- - ljk4-1   Pat Robertson insinuates ill-will on PA town that ...   Nov 11 2005, 03:48 PM
|- - helvick   QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Nov 11 2005, 04:48 PM)Th...   Nov 11 2005, 05:05 PM
||- - ljk4-1   I wonder what it means that so many Red States got...   Nov 11 2005, 05:26 PM
||- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Nov 11 2005, 05:26 PM)I ...   Nov 12 2005, 10:30 AM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Nov 11 2005, 03:48 PM)Pa...   Nov 11 2005, 05:09 PM
- - mike   Yeah, but see, God works in mysterious ways and He...   Nov 11 2005, 07:46 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (mike @ Nov 11 2005, 07:46 PM)Yeah, but...   Nov 12 2005, 10:45 AM
|- - helvick   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Nov 12 2005, 11:45 A...   Nov 12 2005, 12:03 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (helvick @ Nov 12 2005, 12:03 PM)The co...   Nov 12 2005, 12:36 PM
- - Jeff7   QUOTE If we consider that Earth still has one bill...   Nov 12 2005, 06:28 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (Jeff7 @ Nov 12 2005, 06:28 PM)The esti...   Nov 12 2005, 08:52 PM
- - Tom Ames   On the issue of science education: the reason ID c...   Nov 13 2005, 12:47 AM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (Tom Ames @ Nov 13 2005, 12:47 AM)On th...   Nov 13 2005, 11:33 AM
- - Jeff7   What I find interesting too is that proponents of ...   Nov 13 2005, 05:36 PM
- - deglr6328   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Nov 13 2005, 11:33 A...   Nov 13 2005, 06:09 PM
|- - Tom Ames   The problems I see with ID: 1. It invokes a super...   Nov 13 2005, 09:03 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (deglr6328 @ Nov 13 2005, 06:09 PM)... ...   Nov 14 2005, 11:13 AM
||- - Tom Ames   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Nov 14 2005, 06:13 A...   Nov 15 2005, 05:51 PM
||- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (Tom Ames @ Nov 15 2005, 05:51 PM)Pleas...   Nov 15 2005, 09:29 PM
|- - hendric   QUOTE (deglr6328 @ Nov 13 2005, 12:09 PM)If I...   Nov 16 2005, 05:17 AM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (hendric @ Nov 16 2005, 05:17 AM)... ...   Nov 16 2005, 08:33 AM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (hendric @ Nov 16 2005, 05:17 AM)I pref...   Nov 16 2005, 08:48 AM
||- - ljk4-1   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Nov 16 2005, 03:48 A...   Nov 16 2005, 01:59 PM
|- - ljk4-1   QUOTE (hendric @ Nov 16 2005, 12:17 AM)I pref...   Nov 17 2005, 02:43 PM
- - mike   Some people like to believe that they can just wis...   Nov 13 2005, 09:02 PM
- - mike   It seems to me that in this realm at least there w...   Nov 14 2005, 06:52 PM
|- - ljk4-1   Cornell Professors discuss Intelligent Design Las...   Nov 15 2005, 01:59 PM
- - mike   If anyone can describe a way to prove or disprove ...   Nov 16 2005, 04:09 PM
|- - helvick   QUOTE (mike @ Nov 16 2005, 05:09 PM)If anyone...   Nov 16 2005, 07:08 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (mike @ Nov 16 2005, 04:09 PM)If anyone...   Nov 16 2005, 07:42 PM
- - mike   As I said, even if a really powerful/god-like bein...   Nov 16 2005, 08:16 PM
- - Jeff7   Interesting side note on heavy elements - I wonder...   Nov 17 2005, 05:27 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (Jeff7 @ Nov 17 2005, 05:27 PM)Interest...   Nov 18 2005, 02:21 AM
- - dvandorn   My understanding is that most normal stars can onl...   Nov 17 2005, 05:36 PM
- - deglr6328   I think Jeff is talking about the so called ...   Nov 17 2005, 07:58 PM
- - deglr6328   A neutron star, in some ways, may also be thought ...   Nov 18 2005, 03:00 AM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (deglr6328 @ Nov 18 2005, 03:00 AM)A ne...   Nov 18 2005, 09:00 AM
- - deglr6328   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Nov 18 2005, 09:00 A...   Nov 18 2005, 07:08 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (deglr6328 @ Nov 18 2005, 07:08 PM)I do...   Nov 18 2005, 07:19 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   back to topic: small neutron stars can form by In...   Nov 18 2005, 07:28 PM
|- - ljk4-1   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Nov 18 2005, 02:19 P...   Nov 18 2005, 08:03 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Nov 18 2005, 08:03 PM)Ha...   Nov 18 2005, 08:21 PM
- - dvandorn   Well, yeah, a black hole would be the only thing t...   Nov 18 2005, 08:30 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (dvandorn @ Nov 18 2005, 08:30 PM)Well,...   Nov 18 2005, 08:47 PM
|- - ljk4-1   This fellow co-authored papers with Ward and Brown...   Nov 18 2005, 10:07 PM
||- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Nov 18 2005, 10:07 PM)Th...   Nov 19 2005, 12:24 PM
|- - jamescanvin   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Nov 19 2005, 07:47 A...   Nov 19 2005, 01:10 AM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Nov 19 2005, 01:10 AM)No...   Nov 19 2005, 12:33 PM
|- - dvandorn   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Nov 19 2005, 06:33 A...   Nov 19 2005, 01:03 PM
||- - Richard Trigaux   dvandorn, I think only a calculus or simulation wo...   Nov 19 2005, 09:11 PM
||- - helvick   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Nov 19 2005, 10:11 P...   Nov 19 2005, 09:43 PM
|- - jamescanvin   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux)Neutron stars hold their sh...   Nov 20 2005, 01:01 AM
|- - helvick   Nice feedback James. My estimates were based on so...   Nov 20 2005, 01:59 AM
|- - jamescanvin   QUOTE (helvick @ Nov 20 2005, 12:59 PM)Nice f...   Nov 20 2005, 06:14 AM
- - dvandorn   Hmmmm... if escape velocity at the surface of the ...   Nov 20 2005, 05:20 AM
- - Richard Trigaux   Thank you all for this nice conversation. Just are...   Nov 20 2005, 08:53 AM
- - jamescanvin   Well wadayaknow, turns out somebody has thought a ...   Nov 20 2005, 10:24 PM
- - deglr6328   So the answer seems to be then, that NSs CAN in fa...   Nov 21 2005, 01:36 AM
2 Pages V   1 2 >


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 3rd June 2024 - 02:19 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.