Mercury Landers |
Mercury Landers |
Aug 15 2005, 03:36 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 212 Joined: 19-July 05 Member No.: 442 |
While the likelyhood of a Mercury Lander mission is very low, I was wondering if any planning/studies have been done on such a project?
|
|
|
Nov 27 2005, 08:43 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1870 Joined: 20-February 05 Member No.: 174 |
Two or three years ago, there was some reporting on an odd meteorite that had distinctive isotope patterns and chemistry. There was some speculation it was Mercury ejecta, but that interpretation didn't seem strongly favored. I don't recall it's name/designation. I've heard no further discussion of it, and have wondered what the status on it is. Meteoritical Society meeting abstracts may have contained something but I haven't broused them extensively.
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 01:55 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2530 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 321 |
I can't find the reference to the Mercury smash-and-grab sample return either, although I had found it on the web a couple of years ago. It was a real "outsider" proposal, conceived from someone not really working in space exploration, IIRC, and I don't know if it was an official Discovery proposal or not -- yet it is a solid idea. Certainly this kind of sample return is not as useful scientifically as having a rover move around and delicately select a geologist's wishlist, but what this kind of mission lacks in benefit, it makes up for in cost savings.
NWA 011 is the name of the meteorite that was speculated upon as being mercurean in origin. Here are some discussions of the item's origin, however, that don't even mention the word "Mercury", FWIW: http://web.utk.edu/~lataylor/pub-list/Floss-1153.pdf http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2004/pdf/1094.pdf http://aaa.wustl.edu/Work/pub_files/northwestafrica011.html There can only be so many rocky parent bodies in our solar system's past/present that were large enough to exhibit major radiogenic heating, and Mercury is one of them. Perhaps we'll end up with an exhaustive list one day and identify the Mercury meteorites by elimination. But we're not close to that day... A smash-and-grab sample return would not only have its own value, but would also possibly clinch the identification of Mercury meteorites in our possession. In terms of delta-v, we more or less need a solar orbit that has aphelion at 1 AU and perihelion at 0.48 AU -- that is more delta-v than a Venus/Mars lander, but then the craft would essentially be an Earth lander without instruments. It would be highly desirable to perform remote sensing of the impact site, a la Deep Impact -- the instruments should perhaps be mainly contained on the impactor, since instruments on the return craft wouldn't have any use after the impact while flying back to Earth. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 14th June 2024 - 12:53 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |