Uranus Orbiter, The other proposed ice-giant mission |
Uranus Orbiter, The other proposed ice-giant mission |
Nov 11 2005, 05:13 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 509 Joined: 2-July 05 From: Calgary, Alberta Member No.: 426 |
Since the Neptune Orbiter thread has started to veer into talking about a Uranus orbiter as well, it seemed like a good idea to start a topic for Uranus.
|
|
|
Guest_BruceMoomaw_* |
Nov 30 2005, 08:29 AM
Post
#2
|
Guests |
The document for simulation tests for a Neptune orbiter -- of which there were 2000 -- is at http://library-dspace.larc.nasa.gov/dspace...a-2004-4955.pdf . That for tests for the easier Titan orbit aerocapture is at http://www.inspacepropulsion.com/tech/pubs...Performance.pdf .
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 04:36 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 903 Joined: 30-January 05 Member No.: 162 |
QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Nov 30 2005, 02:29 AM) The document for simulation tests for a Neptune orbiter -- of which there were 2000 -- is at http://library-dspace.larc.nasa.gov/dspace...a-2004-4955.pdf . That for tests for the easier Titan orbit aerocapture is at http://www.inspacepropulsion.com/tech/pubs...Performance.pdf . Amazing findings. Seems 'banking' the craft during the decel is the preferred technique. I thought perhaps pitch manuvers (or a combination of both) would be used. The banking technique seems (roughly) analogous to the hypersonic manuveurs the shuttle employs during earth atmosphere re-entry. The banking technique would have obvious utility in expanding the cross range deflection for a lander type mission (at Titan, Triton, or Pluto). Appreciate very much the information, it sure whets the appetite for future missions. Weird it may be easier to land on Pluto than Mercury . . . . |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th November 2024 - 06:13 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |