IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Nh - The Launch Thread, Godspeed little one
djellison
post Jan 16 2006, 03:08 PM
Post #1


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



I thought it was time, with the Atlas V about to roll out - for a new thread for NH for the launch etc.

Someone asked over at the HZ just how NH can go so fast, this was my reply....

QUOTE
How do you get a spacecraft to Jupiter in under a year? Easy. Make it very very light, and put it on a very very big rocket. The config of Atlas V rocket being used to launch NH (551 - 5m fairing, 5 solids, and one engine on the Centaur stage ) would typically put 8,670kg into GTO or 20,520 into LEO.
New Horizons is 478kg, and it's Star 48B 3rd stage is 2,137kg - so instead of hauling 20 tons, this vehicle is hauling about 2.5 tons thus you get a HUGE velocity out of it. AND, once it's done that, you have the final kick of the 48B, 591 thousand kgs-s (thus accelerating is all a further 3.5 - 4km/s ball park speed, if my maths is right)
At launch - the vehicle is 573,160kg. NH is 0.083% of it.
Imagine the Apollo entry capsule on top of a Saturn V...tiny tiny tiny... that was 5,800 kg on a 3,038,500kg rocket - 0.191% - more than double that percentage of NH. The cutaway's are almost comical, with this tiny gold-clad box on an enormous vehicle.
Basically - it's a LOT of rocket, and not a lot of payload.
For comparison, look how much fuss was made of Stardust that entered so quickly. It took >16 hrs to get from the distance of the moon to Utah. NH makes that journey in 9 hours smile.gif
One thing the NH mission is not short of, is superlatives.


I'm not one for good luck charms (although I'll eat peanuts during a Martian EDL with the best of them), but this mission has been so long in coming, that it deserves every ounce of luck it can have - the best, most accurate launch possible, the cleanest checkout, and incident free cruise to Jupiter.

Goodluck and Godspeed little one, we're with you every step of the way.

Doug
PS - Alan, you're a credit to your field, spending so much time answering questions and writing the PI Perspectives, it's been a hell of a journey!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
djellison
post Jan 22 2006, 09:43 AM
Post #2


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



It's not uncommon for LV's to turn, quite a lot, after SRB sep. If you look at the rocket-cam views from Spirit and Opportunity - you can see, once SRB sep has occured, the vehicle turns quite a lot. I'm not sure why, but perhaps it's because they have to be in a particular direction for SRB-jet for range reasons, and THEN can pitch to the launch heading they want?

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ames
post Jan 23 2006, 12:47 PM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 147
Joined: 30-June 05
From: Bristol, UK
Member No.: 423



QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 22 2006, 10:43 AM)
It's not uncommon for LV's to turn, quite a lot, after SRB sep.  If you look at the rocket-cam views from Spirit and Opportunity - you can see, once SRB sep has occured, the vehicle turns quite a lot.  I'm not sure why, but perhaps it's because they have to be in a particular direction for SRB-jet for range reasons, and THEN can pitch to the launch heading they want?

Doug
*


I think the rationale behind this is that early on, what you want to do is to get out of the dense atmosphere (high drag) as quickly as possible and straight up vertically (whilst augmented with the SRB's) is the quickest way.
Then when drag becomes less of an issue you want to build speed to reach orbital velocity and horizontal (tangential) is the way to go. Obviously they can't launch straight up because of safety reasons.
So you usually see a gradual transition from vertical to horizontal, but NH nodded! it was VERY noticeable and may heart sank for a moment.

But I think the Shuttle does it the best. I watched the first launch on TV and thought it was literally going belly up, which actually it was!

It was nice to see the telemetry from the Centaur upper stage. Another heart stopping moment when I looked back and it was firing and pointing directly at the Indian Ocean - some sort of sling shot manoeuvre I presume.

Nick
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Messenger
post Jan 24 2006, 08:13 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 624
Joined: 10-August 05
Member No.: 460



QUOTE (Ames @ Jan 23 2006, 05:47 AM)
I think the rationale behind this is that early on, what you want to do is to get out of the dense atmosphere (high drag) as quickly as possible and straight up vertically (whilst augmented with the SRB's) is the quickest way.
Then when drag becomes less of an issue you want to build speed to reach orbital velocity and horizontal (tangential) is the way to go. Obviously they can't launch straight up because of safety reasons.
So you usually see a gradual transition from vertical to horizontal, but NH nodded! it was VERY noticeable and may heart sank for a moment.


New Horizon used liquid, rather than solid boosters. The 'nod' may have been when more thrust was added after dynamic pressure concerns were reduced.

The Shuttle boosters are solids, so the thrust is controlled by the propellant grain contour: The more grain surface area, the more thrust. There is another subtle difference: Most solid motors burn from the inside out, so there is an inertial column the length of the motor. In a liquid engines, and liquid boosters, the combustion chamber is at the bottom, so it is more like a balanced pencil on the tip of your finger - slightly more prone to wobble than a solid rocket motor.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- djellison   Nh - The Launch Thread   Jan 16 2006, 03:08 PM
- - mchan   In a thread on sci.space.policy, Jim Oberg comment...   Jan 22 2006, 08:14 AM
- - djellison   It's not uncommon for LV's to turn, quite ...   Jan 22 2006, 09:43 AM
|- - Ames   QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 22 2006, 10:43 AM)It...   Jan 23 2006, 12:47 PM
|- - just-nick   QUOTE (Ames @ Jan 23 2006, 05:47 AM)I think t...   Jan 23 2006, 03:31 PM
||- - tty   QUOTE (just-nick @ Jan 23 2006, 05:31 PM...   Jan 23 2006, 08:04 PM
||- - just-nick   QUOTE (tty @ Jan 23 2006, 01:04 PM)Very true....   Jan 24 2006, 04:48 AM
|- - The Messenger   QUOTE (Ames @ Jan 23 2006, 05:47 AM)I think t...   Jan 24 2006, 08:13 PM
- - edstrick   My brother and I both noticed that rapid turn in t...   Jan 22 2006, 10:45 AM
- - dvandorn   Yes, you have the description of Apollo 6 pretty e...   Jan 22 2006, 01:53 PM
|- - Alan Stern   Things are going well here at the APL MOC. New Hor...   Jan 22 2006, 04:08 PM
||- - punkboi   QUOTE (Alan Stern @ Jan 22 2006, 09:08 AM)Bec...   Jan 22 2006, 11:11 PM
||- - ljk4-1   QUOTE (punkboi @ Jan 22 2006, 06:11 PM)Haha.....   Jan 23 2006, 12:45 AM
||- - Alan Stern   QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Jan 23 2006, 12:45 AM)He...   Jan 23 2006, 12:56 AM
||- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (Alan Stern @ Jan 23 2006, 01:56 AM)The...   Jan 23 2006, 01:34 AM
|- - Holder of the Two Leashes   QUOTE (dvandorn @ Jan 22 2006, 07:53 AM)Yes, ...   Jan 23 2006, 02:49 AM
|- - gndonald   QUOTE (Holder of the Two Leashes @ Jan 23 200...   Jan 23 2006, 01:53 PM
- - Bill Harris   On an initial mission like this, it does not pay t...   Jan 23 2006, 01:52 AM
- - edstrick   DVandorn: "....And yet, NASA declared the mis...   Jan 23 2006, 06:00 AM
- - djellison   Yes - the "OMFG it's coming back down...   Jan 23 2006, 12:53 PM
|- - ugordan   QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 23 2006, 01:53 PM)Some...   Jan 23 2006, 01:34 PM
- - Bill Harris   QUOTE It's not uncommon for LV's to turn, ...   Jan 23 2006, 02:05 PM
|- - ugordan   QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Jan 23 2006, 03:05 PM)Ar...   Jan 23 2006, 02:55 PM
|- - RNeuhaus   QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 23 2006, 09:55 AM)That r...   Jan 23 2006, 05:05 PM
|- - yg1968   For those who missed the launch, it can be viewed ...   Jan 23 2006, 05:37 PM
|- - ljk4-1   A Wish for New Horizons by Paul Glister Yesterday...   Jan 23 2006, 07:55 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   Yep. Mercury-Atlas 1 blew up at Max Q -- in front...   Jan 24 2006, 02:25 AM
- - BPCooper   Just to share, I made Astronomy Picture of the Day...   Jan 24 2006, 02:36 PM
|- - ljk4-1   QUOTE (BPCooper @ Jan 24 2006, 09:36 AM)Just ...   Jan 24 2006, 02:52 PM
||- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Jan 24 2006, 03:52 PM)Co...   Jan 24 2006, 03:31 PM
||- - imran   Ben, Congrats! Wow that is one fantastic pic...   Jan 24 2006, 04:53 PM
||- - ugordan   To answer my own question earlier, those of you wh...   Jan 24 2006, 05:18 PM
||- - ustrax   HOW ON EARTH DID I MISS THIS?!?   Jan 24 2006, 05:40 PM
||- - Sunspot   QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 24 2006, 05:18 PM)To ans...   Jan 25 2006, 11:44 PM
||- - BPCooper   QUOTE (Sunspot @ Jan 25 2006, 07:44 PM)What h...   Jan 26 2006, 03:01 AM
|- - dilo   QUOTE (BPCooper @ Jan 24 2006, 02:36 PM)Just ...   Jan 25 2006, 06:43 AM
||- - Tesheiner   QUOTE (dilo @ Jan 25 2006, 07:43 AM)I always ...   Jan 25 2006, 08:56 AM
||- - BPCooper   QUOTE (Tesheiner @ Jan 25 2006, 04:56 AM)IIRC...   Jan 25 2006, 01:01 PM
||- - dilo   Thanks Tesheiner/BPCooper, I suspected this answer...   Jan 25 2006, 10:12 PM
||- - BPCooper   The IMAX film Space Station 3D (2D on DVD format t...   Jan 25 2006, 11:26 PM
|- - mars loon   QUOTE (BPCooper @ Jan 24 2006, 02:36 PM)Just ...   Feb 6 2006, 01:03 AM
- - djellison   The Atlas V 551 uses 5 solid rocket motors + the R...   Jan 24 2006, 08:51 PM
|- - The Messenger   QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 24 2006, 01:51 PM)The ...   Jan 25 2006, 05:41 AM
- - BPCooper   Thanks, yep the remote sound activated camera. I e...   Jan 24 2006, 09:16 PM
- - yaohua2000   Hi all, I have just updated my New Horizons page. ...   Jan 25 2006, 10:58 PM
- - Bill Harris   QUOTE (BPCooper @ Jan 24 2006, 03:16 PM)Thank...   Jan 26 2006, 03:14 AM
- - PhilCo126   Did You all notice that the New Horizons spacecraf...   Jan 26 2006, 08:24 AM
|- - mchan   QUOTE (PhilCo126 @ Jan 26 2006, 12:24 AM)Did ...   Jan 26 2006, 09:36 AM
|- - ljk4-1   QUOTE (PhilCo126 @ Jan 26 2006, 03:24 AM)Did ...   Jan 26 2006, 04:34 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   Ah, so Stern stole ANOTHER one of my ideas, did he...   Jan 26 2006, 09:53 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   Or, as the BabelFish translation of one French aer...   Feb 6 2006, 01:28 AM
|- - BPCooper   QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Feb 5 2006, 09:28 PM)Or,...   Feb 6 2006, 02:51 AM
|- - just-nick   QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Feb 5 2006, 06:28 PM)Or,...   Feb 6 2006, 04:55 AM
- - edstrick   Didn't Captain James <where no man has gone...   Feb 6 2006, 05:34 AM
|- - ljk4-1   QUOTE (edstrick @ Feb 6 2006, 12:34 AM)Didn...   Feb 6 2006, 03:17 PM
|- - paxdan   QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Feb 6 2006, 03:17 PM)Eng...   Feb 7 2006, 09:44 AM
- - edstrick   Space is deep. ____________Space is dark. ________...   Feb 7 2006, 10:29 AM
6 Pages V  « < 4 5 6


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th May 2024 - 11:31 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.