Nh - The Launch Thread, Godspeed little one |
Nh - The Launch Thread, Godspeed little one |
Jan 16 2006, 03:08 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14432 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
I thought it was time, with the Atlas V about to roll out - for a new thread for NH for the launch etc.
Someone asked over at the HZ just how NH can go so fast, this was my reply.... QUOTE How do you get a spacecraft to Jupiter in under a year? Easy. Make it very very light, and put it on a very very big rocket. The config of Atlas V rocket being used to launch NH (551 - 5m fairing, 5 solids, and one engine on the Centaur stage ) would typically put 8,670kg into GTO or 20,520 into LEO. New Horizons is 478kg, and it's Star 48B 3rd stage is 2,137kg - so instead of hauling 20 tons, this vehicle is hauling about 2.5 tons thus you get a HUGE velocity out of it. AND, once it's done that, you have the final kick of the 48B, 591 thousand kgs-s (thus accelerating is all a further 3.5 - 4km/s ball park speed, if my maths is right) At launch - the vehicle is 573,160kg. NH is 0.083% of it. Imagine the Apollo entry capsule on top of a Saturn V...tiny tiny tiny... that was 5,800 kg on a 3,038,500kg rocket - 0.191% - more than double that percentage of NH. The cutaway's are almost comical, with this tiny gold-clad box on an enormous vehicle. Basically - it's a LOT of rocket, and not a lot of payload. For comparison, look how much fuss was made of Stardust that entered so quickly. It took >16 hrs to get from the distance of the moon to Utah. NH makes that journey in 9 hours One thing the NH mission is not short of, is superlatives. I'm not one for good luck charms (although I'll eat peanuts during a Martian EDL with the best of them), but this mission has been so long in coming, that it deserves every ounce of luck it can have - the best, most accurate launch possible, the cleanest checkout, and incident free cruise to Jupiter. Goodluck and Godspeed little one, we're with you every step of the way. Doug PS - Alan, you're a credit to your field, spending so much time answering questions and writing the PI Perspectives, it's been a hell of a journey! |
|
|
Jan 22 2006, 09:43 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14432 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
It's not uncommon for LV's to turn, quite a lot, after SRB sep. If you look at the rocket-cam views from Spirit and Opportunity - you can see, once SRB sep has occured, the vehicle turns quite a lot. I'm not sure why, but perhaps it's because they have to be in a particular direction for SRB-jet for range reasons, and THEN can pitch to the launch heading they want?
Doug |
|
|
Jan 23 2006, 12:47 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 147 Joined: 30-June 05 From: Bristol, UK Member No.: 423 |
QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 22 2006, 10:43 AM) It's not uncommon for LV's to turn, quite a lot, after SRB sep. If you look at the rocket-cam views from Spirit and Opportunity - you can see, once SRB sep has occured, the vehicle turns quite a lot. I'm not sure why, but perhaps it's because they have to be in a particular direction for SRB-jet for range reasons, and THEN can pitch to the launch heading they want? Doug I think the rationale behind this is that early on, what you want to do is to get out of the dense atmosphere (high drag) as quickly as possible and straight up vertically (whilst augmented with the SRB's) is the quickest way. Then when drag becomes less of an issue you want to build speed to reach orbital velocity and horizontal (tangential) is the way to go. Obviously they can't launch straight up because of safety reasons. So you usually see a gradual transition from vertical to horizontal, but NH nodded! it was VERY noticeable and may heart sank for a moment. But I think the Shuttle does it the best. I watched the first launch on TV and thought it was literally going belly up, which actually it was! It was nice to see the telemetry from the Centaur upper stage. Another heart stopping moment when I looked back and it was firing and pointing directly at the Indian Ocean - some sort of sling shot manoeuvre I presume. Nick |
|
|
Jan 24 2006, 08:13 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 624 Joined: 10-August 05 Member No.: 460 |
QUOTE (Ames @ Jan 23 2006, 05:47 AM) I think the rationale behind this is that early on, what you want to do is to get out of the dense atmosphere (high drag) as quickly as possible and straight up vertically (whilst augmented with the SRB's) is the quickest way. Then when drag becomes less of an issue you want to build speed to reach orbital velocity and horizontal (tangential) is the way to go. Obviously they can't launch straight up because of safety reasons. So you usually see a gradual transition from vertical to horizontal, but NH nodded! it was VERY noticeable and may heart sank for a moment. New Horizon used liquid, rather than solid boosters. The 'nod' may have been when more thrust was added after dynamic pressure concerns were reduced. The Shuttle boosters are solids, so the thrust is controlled by the propellant grain contour: The more grain surface area, the more thrust. There is another subtle difference: Most solid motors burn from the inside out, so there is an inertial column the length of the motor. In a liquid engines, and liquid boosters, the combustion chamber is at the bottom, so it is more like a balanced pencil on the tip of your finger - slightly more prone to wobble than a solid rocket motor. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 29th May 2024 - 11:31 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |