Mro On Approach, TCM-3 not required |
Mro On Approach, TCM-3 not required |
Feb 3 2006, 11:06 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 134 Joined: 13-March 05 Member No.: 191 |
MRO has shifted from the cruise phase to Approach phase. Apparently, the trajectory is so good that TCM-3 was cancelled. This is good news for the prospects for a long life for MRO supporting future missions. TCM-4 is on Feb 28, and MOI on March 10. Only 5 weeks away!
|
|
|
Feb 4 2006, 03:19 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14448 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
It's odd to think that from 'aboe' - MRO's burn which actually increase it's speed - but because it will being 'run over' by mars, it will be slowing down w.r.t. Mars itself
I hope they release the op-nav imagery - I'm sure it wont be particularly great, but it will make an interesting little movie watchign Phobos and Deimos doing their thing Doug |
|
|
Feb 4 2006, 03:50 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 813 Joined: 8-February 04 From: Arabia Terra Member No.: 12 |
How many pixels would HiRise get across the disc of Mars now?
|
|
|
Feb 4 2006, 05:26 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2547 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
QUOTE (SFJCody @ Feb 4 2006, 07:50 AM) HiRISE has an IFOV of 1 microradian, so the pixel scale is the distance times 1e-6. MRO is probably about 7 million km out right now (the simulations on the MRO site don't show the range) so that's 7 km/pixel. Mars is about 7000 km in diameter, so that's about 1000 pixels. Of course, there are no plans to take such images that I'm aware of. The opnav camera is pointed in a direction almost 180 degrees away from the rest of the science instruments. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st November 2024 - 01:02 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |