Mercury Science |
Mercury Science |
Nov 16 2005, 02:28 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2454 Joined: 8-July 05 From: NGC 5907 Member No.: 430 |
Astrophysics, abstract
astro-ph/0511419 From: Stan Peale [view email] Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:21:56 GMT (314kb) The proximity of Mercury's spin to Cassini state 1 Authors: S. J. Peale Comments: 23 pages,12 figures, In press in Icarus In determining Mercury's core structure from its rotational properties, the value of the normalized moment of inertia, $C/MR^2$, from the location of Cassini 1 is crucial. If Mercury's spin axis occupies Cassini state 1, its position defines the location of the state. The spin might be displaced from the Cassini state if the spin is unable to follow the changes in the state position induced by the variations in the orbital parameters and the geometry of the solar system. The spin axis is expected to follow the Cassini state for orbit variations with time scales long compared to the 1000 year precession period of the spin about the Cassini state because the solid angle swept out by the spin axis as it precesses is an adiabatic invariant. Short period variations in the orbital elements of small amplitude should cause displacements that are commensurate with the amplitudes of the short period terms. By following simultaneously the spin position and the Cassini state position during long time scale orbital variations over past 3 million years (Quinn {\it et al.}, 1991) and short time scale variations from JPL Ephemeris DE 408 (Standish, 2005) we show that the spin axis will remain within one arcsec of the Cassini state after it is brought there by dissipative torques. We thus expect Mercury's spin to occupy Cassini state 1 well within the uncertainties for both radar and spacecraft measurements, with correspondingly tight constraints on $C/MR^2$. http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0511419 -------------------- "After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance. I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard, and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft." - Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853 |
|
|
Dec 2 2005, 05:21 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2454 Joined: 8-July 05 From: NGC 5907 Member No.: 430 |
Paper (*cross-listing*): gr-qc/0511137
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:47:02 GMT (4kb) Date (revised v2): Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:55:15 GMT (4kb) Date (revised v3): Thu, 1 Dec 2005 12:41:58 GMT (4kb) Title: Can Solar System observations tell us something about the cosmological constant? Authors: Lorenzo Iorio Comments: Latex2e, 4 pages, 2 table, no figures, 11 references. Table 2 added, typos in the units of Lambda corrected \\ In this note we show that the latest determinations of the residual Mercury's perihelion advance, obtained by accounting for almost all known Newtonian and post-Newtonian orbital effects, yields only very broad constraints on the cosmological constant. Indeed, from \delta\dot\omega=-0.0036 + - 0.0050 arcseconds per century one gets -2 10^-34 km^-2 < Lambda < 4 10^-35 km^-2. The currently accepted value for Lambda, obtained from many independent cosmological and large-scale measurements, amounts to almost 10^-46 km^-2. \\ ( http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0511137 , 4kb) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ \\ Paper (*cross-listing*): gr-qc/0511138 Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:50:40 GMT (8kb) Title: Solar System planetary motions and modified gravity Authors: Lorenzo Iorio Comments: Latex2e, 8 pages, 4 tables, no figures, 25 references \\ According to the braneworld model of gravity by Dvali, Gabadadze and Porrati, our Universe is a four-dimensional space-time brane embedded in a larger, infinite five-dimensional bulk space. Contrary to the other forces constrained to remain on the brane, gravity is able to explore the entire bulk getting substantially modified at large distances. This model has not only cosmological consequences allowing to explain the observed acceleration of the expansion of our Universe without resorting to the concept of dark energy, but makes also testable predictions at small scales. Interestingly, such local effects can yield information on the global properties of the Universe and on the kind of expansion currently ongoing. Indeed, among such predictions there are extra precessions of the perihelia and the mean longitudes of the planetary orbits which are affected by a twofold degeneration sign: one sign refers to a Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker phase while the opposite sign is for a self-sccelerated phase. In this paper we report on recent observations of planetary motions in the Solar System which are compatible with the existence of a fifth dimension as predicted in the Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati model with a self-accelerated cosmological phase, although the errors are still large. The Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker phase is, instead, ruled out. \\ ( http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0511138 , 8kb) -------------------- "After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance. I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard, and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft." - Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853 |
|
|
Jan 12 2006, 08:00 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2454 Joined: 8-July 05 From: NGC 5907 Member No.: 430 |
Mercury a Possible Hit-and-Run Planet
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/0601...it_and_run.html New computer modeling shows that the planet Mercury might have formed in a hit-and-run collision that stripped off its outer layers. -------------------- "After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance. I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard, and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft." - Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853 |
|
|
Feb 17 2006, 08:49 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2454 Joined: 8-July 05 From: NGC 5907 Member No.: 430 |
Science/Astronomy:
* Catch Mercury While You Can http://www.space.com/spacewatch/060217_night_sky.html Once again it is time to seek out what has often been cited as the most difficult of the five brightest naked-eye planets to see: Mercury. -------------------- "After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance. I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard, and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft." - Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853 |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st November 2024 - 12:09 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |