Stardust Analysis Results, initial results for comet Wild 2, including organic compounds |
Stardust Analysis Results, initial results for comet Wild 2, including organic compounds |
Guest_paulanderson_* |
Feb 21 2006, 06:17 PM
Post
#1
|
Guests |
I thought the analysis results, as they come in, deserved their own thread. I'm interested in how these findings relate to the "weird crystals" found and reported on in the previous Nature article.
A couple more updates, from Space.com and MSNBC: Stardust Mission Yields Ancient Comet Dust http://space.com/scienceastronomy/060220_s...ust_update.html Comet Dust Sparks Scientific Intrigue http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11460590 "The early results reveal that the 4.5 billion-year-old comet contains iron, sulfides, glassy materials, olivine, and what the scientists termed potentially interesting isotopic traces. They believe that these materials were also available during the formation of other objects in our solar system. What's even more amazing is how well the first round of analysis is matching expectations. Brownlee and other Stardust scientists are holding back their first formal reports for a scientific meeting in Texas next month but during Monday's news conference, Brownlee said the samples studied so far contain iron sulfides and glassy material such as crystalline silicates. Those ingredients are found in meteorites as well. Later, Brownlee told MSNBC.com that there were preliminary indications of organic compounds, based on telltale infrared readings. He cautioned that the initial indications were tentative and could still be traced to contaminants. In the weeks and months ahead, Sandford and his team will be analyzing the types of carbon found in the samples not only to trace the organics, but also to determine whether such compounds predated the formation of the solar system." |
|
|
Mar 14 2006, 10:00 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
In re this first press conference...
First, why no mention of the organic materials we've been hearing rumors about? A lot of discussion of minerals, but it took a reporter's question about organics for them to discuss it at all. And when they did, all they discussed was how difficult it is to differentiate between real organics in the samples and contamination from the lab. Are we to take it that we won't get *any* discussion of possible organics in the samples, because they're too gun-shy to ascribe organics to the samples themselves? Second, these guys seem really blown away by seeing high-temperature-differentiated minerals (olivines, pyroxines, anorthosites, etc.) in a body that accreted in the outer solar system. Anyone ever mention the T-Tauri winds to these guys? It's been known for a long time that the Sun blew all of the loose material from the solar nebula out into a shell at *least* as far out as the Kuiper belt during its T-Tauri stage. So why does it surprise anyone that we find grains of high-temperature minerals in bodies that accreted in the Kuiper belt? After all, those bodies had to have vacuumed up a lot of the dust and gasses pushed out from the inner system during the T-Tauri epoch, right? I guess it's just surprising to me how amazed these guys get when their results support decades-old theories... On the plus side, I heard one of the panel members state that Stardust@Home ought to get going in the next couple of weeks. I'm looking forward to hearing from them. -the other Doug -------------------- The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right. -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 13th June 2024 - 11:55 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |