Landing on Mercury on equator at perihelion |
Landing on Mercury on equator at perihelion |
Mar 21 2006, 12:18 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 40 Joined: 20-March 06 Member No.: 720 |
How will it be to make a manned landing at Mercury at its closest to the sun (perihelion) on its equator when the sun is in the zenith ,what are the dangers of a landing then? Do we need to be protected against the sunheat and radiation then? How strong is the heat and radiation of the sun then ,and is it dangerous when the solaractivity is high then? What kind of spacesuits do we need then? Better protected suits than we have used on the apollo moonlandings i think. Can you explain how a landing on Mercury will be when it is at perihelion and land on its equator with the sun directly overhead? I hope it will ever happen. Lets start discuss about it.
|
|
|
Guest_Richard Trigaux_* |
Mar 22 2006, 07:26 PM
Post
#2
|
Guests |
An ion drive would do well on a trajectory to Mercury. Plenty of solar energy.
I cannot calculate if such a trajectory is feasible, but I well see a probe launched at 11km/s from Earth on a sun orbit, spiraling closer an closer from Mercury orbit, until it is caugh in orbit around it. Then it continues braking with its ion drive untill it is on a low orbit. After of course a classical chemical rocket is necessary to land. Such a mission would need much less fuel than braking all the speed from a direct approach with only a chemical rocket. So it removes part of the cost problem. I feel that Mercury is not just the grey and boring world we currently imagine. Interesting and unusual geology may exist near the poles if there are sulphur deposits. And where this sulphur would come from? Volcanoes! Oh, better: sulphate rocks from an ancient ocean!!! I think it is simply incredible that Mercury just stopped any large scale geologic activity sooner than the much smaller Moon. There is a mistery, worth at least an orbiter. With ion drive, it would not be so costy. |
|
|
Mar 22 2006, 08:09 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2454 Joined: 8-July 05 From: NGC 5907 Member No.: 430 |
I feel that Mercury is not just the grey and boring world we currently imagine. Interesting and unusual geology may exist near the poles if there are sulphur deposits. And where this sulphur would come from? Volcanoes! Oh, better: sulphate rocks from an ancient ocean!!! I think it is simply incredible that Mercury just stopped any large scale geologic activity sooner than the much smaller Moon. There is a mistery, worth at least an orbiter. With ion drive, it would not be so costy. I wonder if Mercury "stopped" its major geology because it did not have a larger world near it to pull on it and attract more larger planetoids and comets to hit it? I also recall a theory in the 1970s that Mercury may have been a moon of Venus, as it has one of the more eccentric solar orbits of the planets - plus I am sure bearing some resemblance to our Moon may have been the "inspiration" for the idea. Any merit to it? Or just not enough evidence? My goodness - what if Mercury was "spawned" from Venus just as our Moon was by a Mars-sized space rock hitting Earth, but this time the planet was knocked away from Venus into its own solar orbit? Now we would have an even greater need to get surface samples back from both worlds! -------------------- "After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance. I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard, and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft." - Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853 |
|
|
Mar 22 2006, 09:27 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2530 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 321 |
My goodness - what if Mercury was "spawned" from Venus just as our Moon was by a Mars-sized space rock hitting Earth, but this time the planet was knocked away from Venus into its own solar orbit? The composition of Mercury makes that very unlikely. The iron making up Mercury would have been in the middle of Venus, so for that origin to work out, there would have had to have been a collision that knocked more middlestuff out than edgestuff. It would be more apt to say that Venus had been knocked off of Mercury. I don't think it happened. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th September 2024 - 10:03 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |