PFS issue on Venus Express, PFS scanner stuck in its closed position |
PFS issue on Venus Express, PFS scanner stuck in its closed position |
Mar 21 2006, 09:03 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 370 Joined: 12-September 05 From: France Member No.: 495 |
Bad news for PFS. I hope they will be able to solve this issue.
The PFS scanner is stuck in its closed position. Several attempts to move it were made at the time, but the instrument did not respond. Experts suspected a thermal problem by which low temperatures were blocking the rotation of the mechanism. Another attempt to move the scanner was made on 16 March 2006, in warmer flight conditions. Unfortunately, the scanner remains stuck. The next opportunity to perform another test on the spacecraft will be end of April, after the Venus Orbit Insertion. From http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/in...fobjectid=38964 |
|
|
Mar 22 2006, 08:37 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14448 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Boys - don't make me come in here!! Inappropriate politics removed.
I'm amazed you've not had a dig at something/someone about this one though Bruce - deployment of devices in space is something you've enjoyed lambasting in the past ( based on Galileo and MEX ) Doug |
|
|
Mar 22 2006, 03:07 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 624 Joined: 10-August 05 Member No.: 460 |
Boys - don't make me come in here!! Inappropriate politics removed. I'm amazed you've not had a dig at something/someone about this one though Bruce - deployment of devices in space is something you've enjoyed lambasting in the past ( based on Galileo and MEX ) Doug It is not inappropriate to complain about the untimeliness of this release. In a worse case scenario, the failure will be traced to widget xyz, and the same widget has a deployment function on New Horizions. Failures of space-based hardware need to be known and understood by the space design communtity in a timely manner, so we can look under the bonnet of anything we are building and fix it, before it hits the street. This is a space health management issue... |
|
|
Mar 22 2006, 04:05 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14448 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
|
|
|
Guest_BruceMoomaw_* |
Mar 22 2006, 08:15 PM
Post
#5
|
Guests |
It IS inappropriate to bring Iraq into it, to use a rather crude phrasology when refering to the Italians and to have a post that saying nothing but "Grrrrrrrrr" Doug Yeah, actually it was (although you'll note that I was actually sneering at US pretensions of superiority in that post, by doing a Merle Haggard imitation with a sarcastic snark at the end). My apologies. (Also, I thought Messenger was GRRRing at me, rather than at the damn PFS.) I would imagine that solar cycling has as much chance of remedying this as anything, although it will be tricky to pull off. If they can't correct this, it WILL be a pity to lose it -- PFS was the second most important instrument onboard. Yet again, moving parts prove to be the bane of space missions, and we have proof that it's better to err on the side of excess in designing the strength of actuators (whether motors or springs). |
|
|
Mar 22 2006, 10:04 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 311 Joined: 31-August 05 From: Florida & Texas, USA Member No.: 482 |
Yeah, actually it was (although you'll note that I was actually sneering at US pretensions of superiority in that post, by doing a Merle Haggard imitation with a sarcastic snark at the end). My apologies. (Also, I thought Messenger was GRRRing at me, rather than at the damn PFS.) I would imagine that solar cycling has as much chance of remedying this as anything, although it will be tricky to pull off. If they can't correct this, it WILL be a pity to lose it -- PFS was the second most important instrument onboard. Yet again, moving parts prove to be the bane of space missions, and we have proof that it's better to err on the side of excess in designing the strength of actuators (whether motors or springs). Dumb question, but is VIRTIS the primo instrument of VExpress? Are some mission objectives compromised if PFS remains stuck, or can VIRTIS still achieve the main science goals? After Mars Express gave us the Great Boom Scare of '05, I wonder if some serious thought & money should be spent trying to make deploy-or-bust designs? |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 31st October 2024 - 11:53 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |