Lunar Spacecraft Images, A place for moon panoramas, mosaics etc. |
Lunar Spacecraft Images, A place for moon panoramas, mosaics etc. |
 Jun 5 2005, 01:27 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Solar System Cartographer  Group: Members Posts: 10256 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227  |
As promised in another thread... I thought all the images from Surveyor, Apollo etc. needed another place to go than the Mars Forum.
I will start the thing off with a link, not an image. I occasionally have images in Chuck Wood's Lunar Picture of the Day (LPOD) website, www.lpod.org. This URL: http://www.lpod.org/LPOD-2005-05-25.htm is my latest, a Clementine LWIR mosaic. The text accompanying the image explains how I made it. LWIR images from the PDS look useless but they can be made into very nice image strips. In most areas of the Moon they are the highest resolution images available, since the HIRES camera only functioned well over near-polar latitudes. So image junkies who want to see new scenery emerge from their computers can go wild! Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
 |
 
|
 |
|
Mar 23 2006, 02:34 PM
Post
#2
|
|
 Member Group: Members Posts: 510 Joined: 17-March 05 From: Southeast Michigan Member No.: 209 |
This is pretty much why I'm skeptical about the whole Singularity concept. Rather than work hard to develop faster and better technology, people will tend to spend more time net surfing, reading fora, chatting, or park themselves on the couch to watch bad reality TV shows.
-------------------- --O'Dave
|
|
|
|
Phil Stooke Lunar Spacecraft Images Jun 5 2005, 01:27 AM
Phil Stooke PS - did I mention I'm having the hardest time... Jun 5 2005, 01:29 AM
Bob Shaw Phil:
Well done - I thought Clementine was a bit ... Jun 6 2005, 05:28 PM MizarKey Phil, the pages for the images for 6/2 and 6/4 are... Jun 6 2005, 05:18 PM Phil Stooke Bob - quit asking me questions! I'm suppo... Jun 6 2005, 07:49 PM um3k QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Jun 6 2005, 03:49 PM)I... Jun 6 2005, 09:02 PM Phil Stooke This is a Clementine HIRES mosaic of the south pol... Jun 6 2005, 09:02 PM Phil Stooke Mizarkey asked about LPOD. They had server proble... Jun 11 2005, 04:40 AM Phil Stooke Here's another unfamiliar lunar scene...
Clem... Jun 17 2005, 01:12 PM dilo SMART-1's tribute to Cassini
http://www.esa.in... Jun 23 2005, 05:38 AM tedstryk Hard to tell...depends how much of the frame that ... Jun 23 2005, 01:18 PM Phil Stooke I don't see any evidence for imperfect focus i... Jun 23 2005, 02:30 PM Phil Stooke OK, here's the comparison...
I have chosen ... Jun 23 2005, 04:04 PM Bob Shaw The problem I have with both SMART-1 and Mars Expr... Jun 23 2005, 09:35 PM Phil Stooke Yes, Bob, you're right.
I forgot to mention, ... Jun 23 2005, 09:45 PM Bob Shaw Apollo 13 and SLA panels in flight - before the, e... Mar 4 2006, 11:10 PM helvick QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Mar 4 2006, 11:10 PM) A... Mar 5 2006, 08:25 AM Bob Shaw Today's Space.com post includes an article fea... Mar 27 2006, 12:36 PM chris [quote name= quote in reply - removed
[/quote]
Ve... Mar 27 2006, 12:47 PM djellison It shows the comparative 'resolving power... Jun 23 2005, 10:05 PM Bob Shaw We saw the Huygens images (albeit with all sorts o... Jun 23 2005, 10:28 PM ilbasso Of course, the other-other possibility is that thi... Jun 23 2005, 10:22 PM djellison Well - the MEX data is slowly getting put in an on... Jun 24 2005, 07:31 AM Phil Stooke Here's my latest image from the Jurassic perio... Feb 10 2006, 09:41 PM tedstryk QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Feb 10 2006, 09:41 PM)He... Feb 10 2006, 10:29 PM Bernard Superb!!!
I really wait for your book;... Feb 11 2006, 10:04 AM Bob Shaw QUOTE (Bernard @ Feb 11 2006, 11:04 AM)Superb... Feb 11 2006, 08:10 PM edstrick <grins and applauds the Surveyor mosaics> S... Feb 11 2006, 11:57 AM Phil Stooke -Puff!- I'm working as fast as I can! ... Feb 11 2006, 08:38 PM Bob Shaw QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Feb 11 2006, 09:38 PM)-P... Feb 11 2006, 09:08 PM Phil Stooke You're right, Bob.
Phil Feb 11 2006, 09:10 PM tedstryk Here is some progress on my Luna 9 work. Enjoy... Feb 12 2006, 01:52 AM RNeuhaus The view on Moon surface is somewhat strange to me... Feb 12 2006, 02:00 AM Phil Stooke Very nice, Ted. The spacecraft tilted slightly be... Feb 12 2006, 05:17 AM BruceMoomaw The Soviets remarked on that slight post-landing s... Feb 12 2006, 06:11 AM tedstryk QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Feb 12 2006, 06:11 A... Feb 12 2006, 03:02 PM Bob Shaw QUOTE (tedstryk @ Feb 12 2006, 03:02 PM) ... Feb 12 2006, 08:59 PM BruceMoomaw These days fax machines weigh about as two journal... Feb 12 2006, 11:48 PM Phil Stooke Doppler, Bob? That doesn't sound right. I... Feb 13 2006, 12:21 AM Bob Shaw QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Feb 13 2006, 12:21 A... Feb 13 2006, 12:26 AM tedstryk Here is a version I am working on flattening out. ... Feb 13 2006, 01:05 AM edstrick I have long looked at the Luna 9 pans and compared... Feb 13 2006, 02:04 AM Phil Stooke There certainly is some low to medium scale relief... Feb 13 2006, 03:55 AM ljk4-1 Would it be possible to use the Surveyor solar pan... Feb 13 2006, 05:21 AM djellison QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Feb 13 2006, 05:21 A... Feb 13 2006, 08:54 AM Bob Shaw QUOTE (djellison @ Feb 13 2006, 08:54 AM)... Feb 13 2006, 12:20 PM ljk4-1 QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Feb 13 2006, 07:20 AM) ... Feb 13 2006, 01:55 PM AndyG QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Feb 13 2006, 12:20 PM) ... Feb 13 2006, 04:35 PM Bob Shaw Andy and Phil:
I take your points - but remember ... Feb 13 2006, 06:33 PM dvandorn QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Feb 13 2006, 12:33 PM) ... Feb 13 2006, 11:18 PM edstrick Luna 9 might be in that cluster of secondaries at ... Feb 13 2006, 05:56 AM Phil Stooke What about the optical reflectivity of the high ga... Feb 13 2006, 04:22 PM edstrick Nah..... not hydrogen.
Methane! Feb 14 2006, 09:55 AM Phil Stooke "Surveyor 3 woke up enough to try to take TV ... Feb 14 2006, 01:35 PM ljk4-1 QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Feb 14 2006, 08:35 A... Feb 14 2006, 04:23 PM Bob Shaw QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Feb 14 2006, 01:35 P... Feb 14 2006, 07:40 PM Phil Stooke A rather bland image... it's the foreground of... Feb 27 2006, 03:17 PM tedstryk Phil, admit it. You don't reprocess these ima... Feb 27 2006, 04:51 PM Phil Stooke You got it, Ted. The best part is, NASA is paying... Feb 27 2006, 06:05 PM Phil Stooke This is the current state of the Surveyor 6 pan...... Feb 28 2006, 08:18 PM dilo Amazing masterpiece, Phil ... I admire your patie... Feb 28 2006, 08:33 PM Bob Shaw Phil:
If you ever have time, would you consider t... Feb 28 2006, 09:09 PM Myran On the subject on the flashes some claimed to have... Feb 28 2006, 10:09 PM Bob Shaw QUOTE (Myran @ Feb 28 2006, 10:09 PM) On ... Feb 28 2006, 10:13 PM Phil Stooke My work with Surveyor pans is very tedious and tim... Feb 28 2006, 10:25 PM dvandorn QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Feb 28 2006, 04:25 P... Feb 28 2006, 11:42 PM dilo Phil, did you consider the use of a stitch program... Mar 1 2006, 12:39 AM Myran QUOTE Bob Shaw said: ....there *have* been observa... Feb 28 2006, 10:26 PM Phil Stooke Replying to two messages from Dilo -
First, the M... Mar 1 2006, 01:33 AM dilo Thanks for details, Phil. Cannot wait for full-res... Mar 1 2006, 06:30 AM dilo QUOTE (dilo @ Mar 1 2006, 07:30 AM) Thank... Mar 1 2006, 09:27 PM Phil Stooke oh yeah - I forgot to mention I get paid to play... Mar 1 2006, 02:03 PM antoniseb That is a cool shot. I had forgotten about the pan... Mar 5 2006, 10:34 PM Bob Shaw QUOTE (antoniseb @ Mar 5 2006, 10:34 PM) ... Mar 5 2006, 10:59 PM edstrick Its likely that any panels that did a posigrade lu... Mar 6 2006, 08:27 AM Phil Stooke The next installment of the Surveyor 6 pan. This ... Mar 6 2006, 05:06 PM Phil Stooke Here's a full resolution section from the Surv... Mar 22 2006, 08:34 PM Bob Shaw Phil:
Is this image of any use to you? It's o... Mar 22 2006, 10:11 PM BruceMoomaw QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Mar 22 2006, 10:11 PM) ... Mar 23 2006, 01:35 AM ljk4-1 QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Mar 22 2006, 08:35 P... Mar 23 2006, 02:14 PM Phil Stooke Judging by the number of posts, I'm only half ... Mar 23 2006, 02:32 AM BruceMoomaw Internet posts are like eating chips out of a bag ... Mar 23 2006, 03:42 AM djellison Hmm - pringles.
Doug Mar 23 2006, 02:18 PM ljk4-1 [quote name= quote in reply - removed
[/quote]
It... Mar 23 2006, 03:06 PM BruceMoomaw I see Phil's LPSC talk on the great Lunar Land... Mar 27 2006, 08:04 PM Phil Stooke I should emphasize I only submitted a "print-... Mar 27 2006, 09:28 PM Bob Shaw Phil:
I was intrigued by the (possible) Clementin... Mar 28 2006, 12:47 PM Phil Stooke The possible Ranger 6 ejecta deposit is dark in th... Mar 28 2006, 01:45 PM Bob Shaw Phil:
What about the sizes of the areas disturbed... Mar 28 2006, 02:06 PM ljk4-1 And wouldn't the color/shading of the impact a... Mar 28 2006, 02:09 PM Phil Stooke We don't have a good sample, and the different... Mar 28 2006, 02:17 PM PhilHorzempa It would be nice to find the impact location of Lu... Mar 31 2006, 08:02 PM BruceMoomaw The Agena and Centaur stages were deliberately aim... Mar 31 2006, 08:19 PM Phil Stooke Reports at the time all agree that the Luna 2 uppe... Mar 31 2006, 08:51 PM Bob Shaw An eccentric artistic globe-making enterprise whic... Apr 7 2006, 11:14 PM Phil Stooke Surveyor 6 goodies:
The raw panorama, scanned fro... Apr 19 2006, 01:26 PM Bob Shaw Phil:
Superb!
And I'm really looking for... Apr 19 2006, 02:44 PM Phil Stooke Bob asks: "Ever thought of putting up some Q... Apr 19 2006, 03:12 PM Bill Harris >Now I have completed the set of five Surveyor ... Apr 19 2006, 09:56 PM |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st November 2024 - 12:35 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|
