PFS issue on Venus Express, PFS scanner stuck in its closed position |
PFS issue on Venus Express, PFS scanner stuck in its closed position |
Mar 21 2006, 09:03 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 370 Joined: 12-September 05 From: France Member No.: 495 |
Bad news for PFS. I hope they will be able to solve this issue.
The PFS scanner is stuck in its closed position. Several attempts to move it were made at the time, but the instrument did not respond. Experts suspected a thermal problem by which low temperatures were blocking the rotation of the mechanism. Another attempt to move the scanner was made on 16 March 2006, in warmer flight conditions. Unfortunately, the scanner remains stuck. The next opportunity to perform another test on the spacecraft will be end of April, after the Venus Orbit Insertion. From http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/in...fobjectid=38964 |
|
|
Mar 22 2006, 09:13 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 356 Joined: 12-March 05 Member No.: 190 |
I am only able to remember one instance where a stuck instrument cover was removed DURING the mission. The Viking Mars scoop cover that was shaken out over several days of back and forth motions of the motor controlling it. Are there more examples? All the others I can think of, Galileo HGA, Pioneer camera cover not popping off, Venera camera cover not popping off and some missions where solar panels fail to open, were never fixed....
|
|
|
Mar 24 2006, 01:26 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 903 Joined: 30-January 05 Member No.: 162 |
I am only able to remember one instance where a stuck instrument cover was removed DURING the mission. The Viking Mars scoop cover that was shaken out over several days of back and forth motions of the motor controlling it. Are there more examples? All the others I can think of, Galileo HGA, Pioneer camera cover not popping off, Venera camera cover not popping off and some missions where solar panels fail to open, were never fixed.... Voyager II had an apparent indication of the science boom failing to lock in place when it actually had. (kind of the reverse of the problem in this case) One of the US lunar Surveyor crafts had a surface sensor (gamma ray surface composition device?) fail to deploy completely and the sampling scoop was used to position it correctly. The Explorer craft (39?) orbiting the moon had incomplete extensions of the antennas, but the problem did not substantially effect the science return. Booms only extended (IIRC) 700+ feet instread of 1000+ ft. Space shuttles have had payload door alignment problems during opening and closing (or failing to do so), but usually it is the thermal expansion of the vehicle that causes the problem and they know how to alleviate the problem. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st November 2024 - 01:02 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |