LIGO, High Gear Science Run |
LIGO, High Gear Science Run |
Mar 3 2006, 03:05 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 624 Joined: 10-August 05 Member No.: 460 |
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=19142
QUOTE ST. LOUIS, Mo. -- The quest to detect and study gravitational waves with the NSF-funded Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) is now in the fourth month of its first sustained science run since achieving its promised design sensitivity, project personnel announced at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). ... Now that the LIGO is sensitive enough to detect changes in distance a mere thousandth the diameter of a proton, Marx adds, the science return should be even greater. Recent results from the Swift satellite pinpointing the location of short gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) have also heightened astronomers' interest in the results from LIGO's current observational run. That level of sensitivity is, in my opinion, the most incredible technical achievement since the VLA. The very long gamma ray associated with supernova/hypernova 1996aj should also be of great interest. |
|
|
Apr 18 2006, 05:40 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 624 Joined: 10-August 05 Member No.: 460 |
http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/forum_thread.php?id=4092
QUOTE (Ben Owen) In LIGO land we've all been running full steam for a while, but it's time for an update.
S5 (the fifth science data run) has been going since early November and is scheduled to last about a year. It was certified (I think by the National Science Board?) as having reached the initial design goal, so we're officially in business. Roughly speaking, S5 data is about twice as good as S4. That is, the strain noise is half what it was in S4. But there is room for improvement. First, the duty cycle for triple coincidence (H1, H2, and L1 interferometers all running) wasn't so hot. The main culprit was L1. Before S4, Livingston was down every day due to logging next door. Improved seismic isolation fixed that, but for the first couple of months of S5 they started adding another building right next to the corner station. It's an education and outreach center, full of all sorts of goodies for the general public. That'll be great, but during the day it meant L1 was down even with the new isolation. The building is done, so we're seeing better duty cycle now. Also, the noise below 100Hz was actually a bit worse than design. That's been slowly improving as some things were caught, but we still don't know what's causing it. Fair bet it's somehow up-conversion of 1-3Hz seismic noise from traffic, since it correlates pretty strongly with the working day and rush hour. Last time I did shifts in the control room was January, and during the day it was enough that we had to lower the laser power to avoid dropping out of lock constantly. One gravel truck wouldn't do it, but two in rapid succession would nail us. One figure of merit is the range to which we could see a signal from a binary neutron star signal. That was peaking at 12 megaparsecs for H1 back in January and dropping to 10 during the day. Now it's up to almost 14 on a good night. ... |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 8th June 2024 - 06:51 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |