GAO: The DSN is actually falling apart |
GAO: The DSN is actually falling apart |
Guest_BruceMoomaw_* |
May 24 2006, 11:55 PM
Post
#1
|
Guests |
|
|
|
Guest_Analyst_* |
May 26 2006, 09:14 AM
Post
#2
|
Guests |
No Reply yet, although without the DSN no planetary exploration (unmanned or manned) can happen. The DSN is part of the invisible infrastructure we simply need before we start thinking about actual missions (like (E)ELVs, launch sites etc). It's very sad this essential networt is not in an optimal shape. A lot of missions with high data rates will stress the DSN and there is still only talk (and no money) about arraying a lot of small antennas (9m to 12m each) or optical communication. The DSN is the bottleneck. Part of the problem is no single mission pays for it, it's fixed costs nobody wants to pay but everybody uses the services. The situation also reminds me of the Apollo age infrastructure at KSC (VAB, pads etc.): 40 years and still useable, but how long?
Analyst |
|
|
Guest_Richard Trigaux_* |
May 26 2006, 10:44 AM
Post
#3
|
Guests |
Things will not spontaneously become better.
DSN is based on a set of large antenna all around the world, so that a given source (for instance the MERs on Mars) can be received 24/24 hours. In more of the quoted problem, a critical failure can occur, like the loss of one of the antenna (crashing down, like it aleady happened to a large dish, or a political setback in a country). I am afraid that for some timezones there is no redundancy, and the loss of only one antenna would create a blind zone, unability to receive certain sources at certain hours. Anyway the only way to increase both safety and capacity of such a network is to increase the number of antennas all around the world. (whatever it is with few large antennas or many small ones) With my opinion, such a unvaluable resource should become international and be managed by the UN. But the US government is known not to agree with such options, see with the ICANN. So international funding should come into the network, into the form of new antennas in new places, the whole thing managed like an economical association, and technically by a centralized unifom authority. |
|
|
May 26 2006, 11:44 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 321 Joined: 6-April 06 From: Cape Canaveral Member No.: 734 |
Things will not spontaneously become better. DSN is based on a set of large antenna all around the world, so that a given source (for instance the MERs on Mars) can be received 24/24 hours. In more of the quoted problem, a critical failure can occur, like the loss of one of the antenna (crashing down, like it aleady happened to a large dish, or a political setback in a country). I am afraid that for some timezones there is no redundancy, and the loss of only one antenna would create a blind zone, unability to receive certain sources at certain hours. Anyway the only way to increase both safety and capacity of such a network is to increase the number of antennas all around the world. (whatever it is with few large antennas or many small ones) With my opinion, such a unvaluable resource should become international and be managed by the UN. But the US government is known not to agree with such options, see with the ICANN. So international funding should come into the network, into the form of new antennas in new places, the whole thing managed like an economical association, and technically by a centralized unifom authority. Why does it have to be a terrestrial system, an orbital system could work without the international implications. |
|
|
May 26 2006, 03:28 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14448 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 31st October 2024 - 10:55 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |