IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

A common mass scaling for satellite systems of gaseous planets
Guest_AlexBlackwell_*
post Jun 14 2006, 05:46 PM
Post #1





Guests






Canup and Ward have a new, interesting paper ("A common mass scaling for satellite systems of gaseous planets") in the June 15, 2006, issue of Nature. See the Editor's Summary for more details.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Rob Pinnegar
post Jun 15 2006, 02:31 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 509
Joined: 2-July 05
From: Calgary, Alberta
Member No.: 426



This is an interesting point, especially when comparing the relative sizes of the major satellites in the Jovian and Uranian systems: two good-sized ones closer in, two somewhat bigger ones further out. (Saturn's system, in a way, is a hybrid: it resembles Uranus' with a Galilean thrown in for good measure).

Is Neptune omited from this argument (even though Triton roughly follows the pattern)?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_AlexBlackwell_*
post Jun 15 2006, 05:30 PM
Post #3





Guests






QUOTE (Rob Pinnegar @ Jun 15 2006, 02:31 PM) *
Is Neptune omited from this argument (even though Triton roughly follows the pattern)?

Primarily, Canup and Ward use Jupiter, Saturn, and Uranus and their coterie of satellites in their model, though they do consider Neptune. From the paper (references omitted):

QUOTE
"Although the model presented here applies to regular satellite formation, it is remarkable that Neptune's single large, irregular satellite, Triton, also contains a similar mass fraction, with M(Triton)/M(P) ~ 2.1 x 10^-4. Triton's orbit is retrograde and inclined, and it is believed to have been captured intact from heliocentric orbit. Although we lack direct evidence of a putative original prograde neptunian satellite system, it seems clear that it cannot have contained much greater total mass than Triton itself. Otherwise, a retrograde and initially eccentric Triton would have been destroyed while traversing the regular satellite region (either as it was accreted or collisionally disrupted, or by the decay of its orbital angular momentum36 owing to interactions with a much greater mass in prograde material). The survival of a captured retrograde satellite requires it to have comparable or greater mass than any prograde system with which it actively interacts. As larger interlopers would have been less numerous (and therefore captured less frequently), the most probable surviving Triton-like object would be one having the smallest mass affording its survival, which would suggest that M(Triton) is similar to the total mass of Neptune's original regular satellites, or M(T)/M(Neptune) ~ O(10^-4) as well."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 8th June 2024 - 01:02 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.