IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Opportunity finds a new type of rock, sol 886 Microscopic Imager near Beagle crater
Guest_Richard Trigaux_*
post Jul 24 2006, 06:24 AM
Post #1





Guests






On sol 886 Oppy's microscopic imager takes shots of a new type of stone previously unseen in Meridiani planum. This place was already shot on sol 885 by the Panoramic Camera, showing a patch of soil looking like gravel.


These stones are clear, chalky looking, with angulous fractures, but slighty rounded as if transported for a while in a river bed. They also show some hollows or veins in some places. In the background there are small more or less rounded stones evoking the smaller blueberries already seen in the beginning.


So I wonder what these stones could be. The most conservative explanation would be that they are freshly broken jarosite, submitted to a bit of eolian erosion. But other explanations are possible. We shall remain in the expectative until some analysis is done.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
dvandorn
post Jul 27 2006, 03:45 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



The rock in question, in the MI images, looks like it has microclasts. It seems to have more than one type of material in it, and yet it all seems to be about equally resistant to erosion.

I think, quite possibly, what we have here is a pebble ground out of a piece of impact melt. Such melt often contains microclasts of material swept up with the melt sheet.

Now, whether it's melt from the Victoria impact, or the Beagle impact, or even a farther-reaching impact, this is the kind of thing I'd expect to see in impact melts on Mars.

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Richard Trigaux_*
post Jul 27 2006, 06:29 AM
Post #3





Guests






Inpact melt?

I don't think that jarosite can melt, it would rather change of chemical composition, from a sulphate to an oxyd (a common industry process). Which could, after, melt...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
imipak
post Jul 27 2006, 06:08 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 646
Joined: 23-December 05
From: Forest of Dean
Member No.: 617



QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Jul 27 2006, 07:29 AM) *
I don't think that jarosite can melt, it would rather change of chemical composition, from a sulphate to an oxyd (a common industry process). Which could, after, melt...


Oxide? But where would the oxygen atoms come from? Hmmm, I suppose if it was an aqueous environment... unsure.gif

It's an interesting question though - what, chemically speaking, would happen to evaporite subjected to a brief blip of intense heat and pressure?


--------------------
--
Viva software libre!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Richard Trigaux_*
post Jul 27 2006, 06:30 PM
Post #5





Guests






QUOTE (imipak @ Jul 27 2006, 06:08 PM) *
Oxide? But where would the oxygen atoms come from? Hmmm, I suppose if it was an aqueous environment... unsure.gif

It's an interesting question though - what, chemically speaking, would happen to evaporite subjected to a brief blip of intense heat and pressure?



No problem, the oxygen is already in there. Sulphates are compositions of the sulphate ion SO4-- with one or two metallic ions (2x M+ or M++) together with water molecules which are required to make the sulphate crystal as we find it.

When heated, (about 100°C??) usualy a sulphate first lose its crystalisation water. It is what happens when industry does plaster from gypsum.

When heated more, (about 200°C??) the sulphate ion breaks, releasing SO2. The remaining oxygen is now available to combine with the metal, it cannot do otherwise anyway because it is already reduced so it cannot escape the combinaison with the metal ion.


If we heat still more, the oxyde melts, a its own temperature, whic can vary from hundred to thousands degrees.




What happens to shocket sulphates? probably what happen to other crystals. I found an interesting link to this about heating asteroids (alternate PDF file). They explain that crystals submitted to intense shock waves undergo a variety of transformations: irregular fractures and melt pockets, together with a heating increasing with the intensity of the shock wave. For low intensities, the effect would not be very different with jarosite, but when we come to higher temperatures, the effect must be different, as jarosite cannot melt without undergoing a chemical change, involving emission of gasses.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tty
post Jul 28 2006, 10:55 AM
Post #6


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 688
Joined: 20-April 05
From: Sweden
Member No.: 273



QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Jul 27 2006, 08:30 PM) *
No problem, the oxygen is already in there. Sulphates are compositions of the sulphate ion SO4-- with one or two metallic ions (2x M+ or M++) together with water molecules which are required to make the sulphate crystal as we find it.

When heated, (about 100°C??) usualy a sulphate first lose its crystalisation water. It is what happens when industry does plaster from gypsum.

When heated more, (about 200°C??) the sulphate ion breaks, releasing SO2. The remaining oxygen is now available to combine with the metal, it cannot do otherwise anyway because it is already reduced so it cannot escape the combinaison with the metal ion.
If we heat still more, the oxyde melts, a its own temperature, whic can vary from hundred to thousands degrees.


There has been a lot of work done on this subject in connection with the Chicxulub impact which occurred in carbonate/sulphate rock and it is well established that very large amounts of SO2/SO3 and CO2 were liberated. There is little doubt that the CO2 remained in the atmosphere for a fairly long time (millenia), while there is more doubt about the sulfur. Sulfuric acid from volcanboes remains in the stratosphere for a few years, but some people think that the sulfuric acid from Chicxulub would quickly have reacted with other material (dust) in the ejecta and fallen back to Earth. Of course things might work differently in the very thin and dry Martian atmosphere.

tty
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Richard Trigaux_*
post Jul 28 2006, 12:54 PM
Post #7





Guests






QUOTE (tty @ Jul 28 2006, 10:55 AM) *
There has been a lot of work done on this subject in connection with the Chicxulub impact which occurred in carbonate/sulphate rock and it is well established that very large amounts of SO2/SO3 and CO2 were liberated. There is little doubt that the CO2 remained in the atmosphere for a fairly long time (millenia), while there is more doubt about the sulfur. Sulfuric acid from volcanboes remains in the stratosphere for a few years, but some people think that the sulfuric acid from Chicxulub would quickly have reacted with other material (dust) in the ejecta and fallen back to Earth. Of course things might work differently in the very thin and dry Martian atmosphere.

tty


Errr? what I heard until recently was that Chicxulub impact punched throught two cristaline (granite-like) layers (which were dated with uranium clock) and that the limestones layers were deposed on it afterward, giving a flat surface obliterating the crater. So that there would be no carbonates involved.

On the other hand, the Ries crater in Germany made into a granite layer, covered by some tens of metres of limestone and shale deposits. There is a work about the granite melt, which gave a layer of about 10m of lava spread all over the crater rim, and nice glass-like light green tectites known as moldavites (because they were found in Moldavia). I know the limestone-shale layers formed large blocks (several hundred metres) which were lifted and then fell back on the crater bottom, sometimes turned upside down, but still with the layering recognizable (shattered I imagine). But I don't know how they responded to shock and heat. We can imagine that shale and clay can form a lava too, we can even try to melt some. Some carbonates too can exist in a liquid form. But sulphates, I don't know.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Richard Trigaux   Opportunity finds a new type of rock   Jul 24 2006, 06:24 AM
- - Bill Harris   Can you point out specific rock in the MI images? ...   Jul 24 2006, 12:35 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Jul 24 2006, 12:35 P...   Jul 24 2006, 07:51 PM
|- - dilo   Are we talking of this strange, blue/gray rock pic...   Jul 24 2006, 09:33 PM
- - Bill Harris   Ah, I see what you mean. During the UMSF outage t...   Jul 24 2006, 10:02 PM
- - Pavel   Anyone remembers Wopmay, the brain-like rock in En...   Jul 24 2006, 10:56 PM
- - Stephen   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Jul 24 2006, 06...   Jul 25 2006, 03:21 AM
- - Richard Trigaux   Dilo, I was not speaking of this bluish rock. But ...   Jul 25 2006, 04:55 AM
- - CosmicRocker   These are the same as the ones I earlier mentioned...   Jul 25 2006, 05:16 AM
- - Richard Trigaux   CosmicRocker, I was speaking of the same rocks you...   Jul 25 2006, 08:32 AM
- - Myran   Hello back again from one day without UMSC, with b...   Jul 25 2006, 03:18 PM
- - Bill Harris   Time for a Meridiani lithology refresher. Drop by...   Jul 25 2006, 09:39 PM
- - glennwsmith   Friends, As an old flint knapper, I'm not goi...   Jul 26 2006, 03:55 AM
- - Bill Harris   It's hard to tell anything about the surface n...   Jul 26 2006, 06:14 PM
- - dvandorn   The rock in question, in the MI images, looks like...   Jul 27 2006, 03:45 AM
|- - Richard Trigaux   Inpact melt? I don't think that jarosite can ...   Jul 27 2006, 06:29 AM
|- - imipak   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Jul 27 2006, 07...   Jul 27 2006, 06:08 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (imipak @ Jul 27 2006, 06:08 PM) Ox...   Jul 27 2006, 06:30 PM
|- - imipak   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Jul 27 2006, 07...   Jul 27 2006, 06:38 PM
|- - tty   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Jul 27 2006, 08...   Jul 28 2006, 10:55 AM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (tty @ Jul 28 2006, 10:55 AM) There...   Jul 28 2006, 12:54 PM
|- - tty   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Jul 28 2006, 02...   Aug 1 2006, 07:18 PM
- - Bill Harris   I'm not sure what the sulfate evaporites do wh...   Jul 27 2006, 12:41 PM
- - CosmicRocker   The place where I got lost in this discussion was ...   Jul 28 2006, 06:23 AM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (CosmicRocker @ Jul 28 2006, 06:23 ...   Jul 28 2006, 12:40 PM
- - Bill Harris   As I recall, the majority of the rocks here are ma...   Jul 28 2006, 12:51 PM
|- - tglotch   QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Jul 28 2006, 12:51 P...   Jul 28 2006, 08:46 PM
- - CosmicRocker   tglotch: Thanks for that. Those are similar to t...   Jul 29 2006, 03:59 AM
- - Bill Harris   Is there any idea of what the silicates are? I do...   Jul 29 2006, 05:27 PM
- - tglotch   The Mini-TES data indicate that the majority of th...   Jul 29 2006, 09:03 PM
|- - Zeke4ther   Tim, Welcome to the forum! We will all look...   Jul 31 2006, 08:02 PM
- - Bill Harris   Thanks, Tim. By terrestrial experience, it would ...   Aug 1 2006, 03:07 PM
|- - CosmicRocker   QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Aug 1 2006, 10:07 AM...   Aug 2 2006, 02:24 AM
- - tglotch   Bill, The feldspar used in the Mini-TES deconvolu...   Aug 1 2006, 03:41 PM
- - Bill Harris   Thanks, Tim. Eventually we'll be able to reco...   Aug 1 2006, 11:06 PM
- - Bill Harris   Oh fiddle.   Aug 2 2006, 02:27 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th June 2024 - 03:51 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.