The unlit side of the rings |
The unlit side of the rings |
Jul 27 2006, 10:56 AM
Post
#1
|
||
IMG to PNG GOD Group: Moderator Posts: 2256 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Near fire and ice Member No.: 38 |
Cassini has previously imaged the unlit side of the rings but now it is doing extensive observations of the unlit side. For the first time in its mission Cassini is spending a significant amount of time north of the ringplane - earlier it has done so only near periapsis but this orbit is different.
This is a quick RGB composite I did from wide angle images: I made no attempts to correct the color - this is probably not very far from the true color of the rings. Large color variations are apparent, the C ring and the Cassini division appear much more bluish than the thicker rings (A and B ). It should be noted that these images were very probably downliked with the 12 -> 8 bit encoding which basically means that dark areas appear too bright in this image because I did not correct for this. It's also interesting to compare this image to Voyager images: Voyager 1: http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA02241 Voyager 2: http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA01955 Voyager 2: http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA01389 |
|
|
||
Aug 1 2006, 01:57 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1887 Joined: 20-November 04 From: Iowa Member No.: 110 |
The rings about a quarter of the way up form the bottom of this image look distorted.
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...2/N00064487.jpg |
|
|
Aug 1 2006, 05:38 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2492 Joined: 15-January 05 From: center Italy Member No.: 150 |
Alan, I cannot see the distorsion... exactly, which rings and how they are distorted?
PS: thanks for great unlit side view and the beeatiful animation, Bjorn! -------------------- I always think before posting! - Marco -
|
|
|
Aug 1 2006, 06:04 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Dublin Correspondent Group: Admin Posts: 1799 Joined: 28-March 05 From: Celbridge, Ireland Member No.: 220 |
|
|
|
Aug 1 2006, 08:27 AM
Post
#5
|
|||
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2492 Joined: 15-January 05 From: center Italy Member No.: 150 |
I can see it but to me it looks as if the rings have quite a rough texture - it's almost as if they were drawn by someone with a fairly heavy brush action. Perhaps you're referring to the disuniformities visible as small hue variation is this RGB version (with enhanced saturation): Anyway, is something barely visible to me... EDIT: just posted a short movie showing spokes transit in this region during previous day, the rough texture noted by alan seems to co-rotate with spokes... I made the following mosaic of 3 images showing the A/F rings with Saturn shadow: I like it... Finally, did someone noticed this very odd image? http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...eiImageID=80270 Image explainations refers to "SATURN-ERING" but I suspect that this bright strip is another piece of main rings, partially eclipsed by saturn shape + shadow... other ideas? -------------------- I always think before posting! - Marco -
|
||
|
|||
Aug 1 2006, 10:21 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3652 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
Finally, did someone noticed this very odd image? http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...eiImageID=80270 Image explainations refers to "SATURN-ERING" but I suspect that this bright strip is another piece of main rings, partially eclipsed by saturn shape + shadow... other ideas? Enceladus or Mimas (at around 90 deg phase) entering eclipse while the camera is staying pointed at the rings? EDIT: Geez... apologies for the triple post, I assumed the board sw would automatically merge them when posted on a short timescale. -------------------- |
|
|
Aug 1 2006, 11:42 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 76 Joined: 19-October 05 Member No.: 532 |
[quote name='ugordan' date='Aug 1 2006, 11:21 AM' post='63268']
Enceladus or Mimas (at around 90 deg phase) entering eclipse while the camera is staying pointed at the rings? The streaked satellite is actually Janus. Thats a very long exposure image (100-200 seconds) tracking some point in the ring plane. The raws site is listing the target as E ring probably because thats the target model used for the exposure calculations. The camera command (ioi) files have two entries for target, 'TARGET_DESC' and 'TARGET_NAME' . TARGET_DESC is supposed to describe the object the image exposure was calculated for while TARGET_NAME indicates the object/position that the camera is actually tracking. Often these are the same, but not always. Its the TARGET_DESC keyword that makes it into the description on the JPL raw site. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 31st October 2024 - 11:43 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |