"Pluto is dead" - Mike Brown, It's official |
"Pluto is dead" - Mike Brown, It's official |
Aug 24 2006, 01:58 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 531 Joined: 24-August 05 Member No.: 471 |
-------------------- - blue_scape / Nico -
|
|
|
Aug 24 2006, 06:47 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Admin Posts: 4763 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Glendale, AZ Member No.: 197 |
I predict that popular culture will continue to speak of "the nine planets" and the "planet Pluto". As someone said on a previous topic, the whole concept of the nature of a planet has been largely cultural and linguistic one anyway.
My experience is that "official" attempts to dictate changes in time-honored concepts and traditions often fall flat (outside of totalitarian dictatorships, that is). I recall that in the 1970s "everyone" was of the view that the US should switch to the metric system. President Carter even went so far as to issue executive orders dictating the use of metric measurements in all things related to the US government. The transition began, but it never stuck. I used to have a 1980 Oldsmobile that required two sets of socket wrenches, metric for the body and English for the engine. The point is that the movement never stuck in US culture and eventually everything reverted back to our English standard (with no commentary from this former engineer as to which system is "better.") I believe the same will happen with this decision on "the Planets." Lacking any kind of "enforcement" school teachers will keep their expensive models and collections of elementary textbooks. This news will fade in about three days, and a month from now the average disinterested members of the public will forget that it ever happened. -------------------- If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
|
|
|
Aug 24 2006, 06:58 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 809 Joined: 11-March 04 Member No.: 56 |
This news will fade in about three days, and a month from now the average disinterested members of the public will forget that it ever happened. Yes, but there are always going to be officious up-to-date people who will undertake to "correct" them if they happen to speak of "nine planets". The worst are going to be the smart-alec kids who will raise their hands in 4th grade and say, "Excuse me, Miss Barringer, but astronomers now say there are only eight planets." You know, kids like you and me when we were that age. |
|
|
Aug 24 2006, 07:01 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2530 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 321 |
Yes, but there are always going to be officious up-to-date people who will undertake to "correct" them if they happen to speak of "nine planets". The worst are going to be the smart-alec kids who will raise their hands in 4th grade and say, "Excuse me, Miss Barringer, but astronomers now say there are only eight planets." You know, kids like you and me when we were that age. This is why I thought the "biggest" thing the community could have done here is to have the "official" word be: "Don't be officious about this. It's inherently vague. Some things are." By making headlines one day and contradictory headlines a few days later, the community perpetuates the unfortunate perception that officiousness is a big part of science. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st June 2024 - 07:44 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |