Duck Bay, New update from Steve |
Duck Bay, New update from Steve |
Sep 20 2006, 05:17 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 122 Joined: 26-June 04 From: Austria Member No.: 89 |
Hello all !
The next steps described by Steve : http://athena.cornell.edu/news/mubss/ Interesting new software capabilities also ! Robert PS: new topic because Duck Bay is the point where Oppys pancams should take the ultimate shot of Victoria |
|
|
Sep 23 2006, 05:58 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2228 Joined: 1-December 04 From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA Member No.: 116 |
The unpegged versions are so much easier on the eye, aren't they? I am not sure if I am seeing things the same way you guys are, especially since I am getting somewhat different distances from AlgoimancerPG. The originally described "sloughing slab" doesn't really look like a "slab" to me in 3D anymore. It seems that there are several outcrops/surfaces at different distances that are juxtaposed in this line of sight. It was suggested in the original raw jpegs, but it is more apparent now.
-------------------- ...Tom
I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast. |
|
|
Sep 23 2006, 01:02 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 656 Joined: 20-April 05 From: League City, Texas Member No.: 285 |
The unpegged versions are so much easier on the eye, aren't they? ... I am getting somewhat different distances from AlgoimancerPG .... At that range the error bounds really need to be taken into account, and unfortunately the farther away the target, the "fuzzier" features become, unless it's something nice and sharp like a cliff edge (in which case you might get better results confining it to a 2D calculation. As to the unpegged versions - yeah, it's just not fair that the only recent images we get to play with are loaded with compression artifacts ; we fund the mission, they keep the good stuff until they get bored with 'em, and these pics make it clear just how extensive the compression of the immediately released pics really is. Yeah, I know we're much better of as compared the the apparently mythical ESA missions, but still. Okay, rant over |
|
|
Sep 24 2006, 06:06 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14434 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th September 2024 - 12:49 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |