Targets for LRO |
Targets for LRO |
Apr 6 2007, 09:41 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 172 Joined: 17-March 06 Member No.: 709 |
You can imagine this to be a companion thread to the one requesting suggestions
for MRO targets on Mars. The LRO (Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter) is set to launch in a little over a year from now. There was to a be a site selection workshop in May 2007, next month, but I see now that it has been cancelled. Therefore, it appears that it is up to us, the UMSF Community to take up the baton and help NASA out. It was done for New Horizons at Jupiter and was very productive. So, what are the sites that you would like to see imaged at 0.5 meter resolution by LROC, LRO's High-Resolution camera? My first suggestion would be to re-photograph the Surveyor 1 landing site to compare it with the images obtained by Lunar Orbiter 3. My second suggestion would be to photograph the Surveyor 6 landing area. This should image S-6 itself, but even more interesting, it may capture images of Surveyor 4, which should be only a mile or so away. This would help to determine whatever happened to S-4, which abruptly stopped transmitting just short of touchdown. Another Phil |
|
|
Apr 8 2007, 12:23 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 316 Joined: 1-October 06 Member No.: 1206 |
Is the LRO going to be able to image the terminator? I'm wondering if any of this putative 'electrostatic weather' at sunrise might be resolvable.
Apart from that - yes - any fairly well documented sight for TLPs would be interesting. Putting on my tinfoil hat for a moment - what about a re-imaging of the infamous 'blair cuspids' P |
|
|
Apr 8 2007, 04:38 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 117 Joined: 7-December 06 From: Sheffield UK Member No.: 1462 |
Putting on my tinfoil hat for a moment - what about a re-imaging of the infamous 'blair cuspids' P On this dubious subject, does anyone remember 'The Shard'? That 1.5 mile high pillar seen in Lunar Orbiter 3 image III-84-M? Too bad it was just an image flaw and didn't show up in any other images of the same area. I think when it comes to possible lunar geological activity, 'Ina' should be very high on the list of potential targets. http://www.physorg.com/news82217633.html -------------------- It's a funny old world - A man's lucky if he gets out of it alive. - W.C. Fields.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th September 2024 - 09:25 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |