Mercury's molten core Options

[Guest_AlexBlackwell_*]

The embargo won't be lifted for a few more hours, but note that the May 4, 2007, issue of Science will have an interesting paper Margot et al. (and accompanying Perspectives piece by Sean Solomon) regarding Mercury and a possible molten core, a paper that also makes the cover.

[edstrick]

When they discovered Mercury's mag field from Mariner 10, besides the absolute magnetic moment (something like field strength*volume) of the field, the other major observation was that the field was off center, tilted and distorted in ways that magnetosphere pressures on the field couldn't explain. Similar things are seen at Uranus and Neptune.

The inference was that the field was being generated in a rather shallow shell, rather than deep inside, far from the surface. In Mercury's case, plausible modles had the core frozen to maybe 2/3 of it's radius with a solid inner core and a convecting outer core.

The question was how could a core of a small and geologically inactive world stay partially molten over 4.5 billion years. A generally plausible model was that refined calculations of lower thermal conductivity in a heavily fractured megaregolith (like the moon's) and the even lower thermal conductivity of a deep, old regolith, could significantly reduce global heat flow and extend the life of a molton core. My recollection is that that was marginal, and models of some additional heating than just that from inner core freez-out would help keep enough core molton to provide a dynamo.

[Rob Pinnegar]

The question was how could a core of a small and geologically inactive world stay partially molten over 4.5 billion years.

I haven't read the new papers, but off the top of my head, a growing inner core might well be made of solid iron which would tend to enrich the sulfur concentration of the remaining outer mantle. This could help keep it molten.