Cassini image database & updates, And notifications of PDS data releases |
Cassini image database & updates, And notifications of PDS data releases |
Dec 25 2006, 08:52 PM
Post
#1
|
|
IMG to PNG GOD Group: Moderator Posts: 2257 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Near fire and ice Member No.: 38 |
I have noticed that the January 1, 2007 Cassini PDS release is already available, see http://pds-imaging.jpl.nasa.gov/data/cassi...assini_orbiter/
I haven't downloaded all of the imaging data and I'm just beginning to digest what I already have but there are some beautiful images of Enceladus' plumes and satellite mutual events, images of the G and D rings and interesting images of Saturn's nightside and fairly good Iapetus images. Radar and VIMS is also available. All in all a nice 'Christmas gift' . |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:36 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
I just went through the process of creating an index page for Dione, using the 2 pixels per degree (=228 pixel diameter) size cutoff:
http://planetary.org/data/cassini/dioneattempt/ WARNING: to view this page requires you to download about 42 MB of data. [Note: I didn't bother uploading the full-size images, only the thumbnails, so the images won't link to anything. Also, I didn't yet include all the fields I mentioned in my previous post; I did intend to include the filters and stupidly forgot. Next time around they'll be in there.] This included more than 500 images, but after seeing the results I don't think it was enough. Cassini has so danged many filters that those 500 images were for a relatively small number of distinct observations (22), most of them on nontargeted flybys; the query did not pull in nearly as many global shots of the moon as I was hoping to get. So I think I will back away and try the 1 pixel per degree cutoff next time. What do you think of the layout, with one observation per line? I think I will reduce the size of the thumbnails next time. They are currently 256 pixels -- I think I will reduce to 128 or even 100. I used IMG2PNG to convert these, and did calibration, but the calibration didn't seem to work for the WAC images for some reason. Comments? Emily -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th November 2024 - 06:13 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |