Cassini image database & updates, And notifications of PDS data releases |
Cassini image database & updates, And notifications of PDS data releases |
Dec 25 2006, 08:52 PM
Post
#1
|
|
IMG to PNG GOD Group: Moderator Posts: 2256 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Near fire and ice Member No.: 38 |
I have noticed that the January 1, 2007 Cassini PDS release is already available, see http://pds-imaging.jpl.nasa.gov/data/cassi...assini_orbiter/
I haven't downloaded all of the imaging data and I'm just beginning to digest what I already have but there are some beautiful images of Enceladus' plumes and satellite mutual events, images of the G and D rings and interesting images of Saturn's nightside and fairly good Iapetus images. Radar and VIMS is also available. All in all a nice 'Christmas gift' . |
|
|
Aug 3 2007, 04:47 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Thanks. For the Photojournal images, I just searched on Dione, and then I matched the dates and, when date was ambiguous (or, in one case, incorrect), I matched the phase angles and distances. A bit tedious but that's one thing I've been very curious about -- just how many of the "good" images have been released to the public in one way or another? It's not a bad proportion, it turns out, but it's not all of them by any means, and there is a LOT that can be done that hasn't yet been done with color data.
The 16-bit images do have a variety of brightnesses, but I did use IMG2PNG with the "-r" switch and all the Cassini calibration data to calibrate them as I did the format conversion. Clear and green filter images do seem to be pretty reasonable in their brightness, UV ones are pretty dark -- which is more or less what I expect, actually. Remember that Dione is somewhat dark as icy satellites go. Maybe Bjorn can comment on whether the full-size images look like they are supposed to, especially in the UV. I did get errors on every WAC image upon conversion though, so I'm not sure that those are properly calibrated. Of the 900 or so NAC images, IMG2PNG reported errors during the calibration step for about 20 of them. On the next go-round I'll do Enceladus and we can see how different those look. --Emily -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st November 2024 - 12:15 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |