Landsat DCM |
Landsat DCM |
Oct 5 2007, 01:06 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 321 Joined: 6-April 06 From: Cape Canaveral Member No.: 734 |
Seems than planetary science gets more coverage here but just decided to add this topic since an Atlas V 401 was just selected.
What can be inferred from this selection? |
|
|
Oct 5 2007, 01:19 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14433 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
What can be inferred from this selection? Someone needs to update the Wiki page about Atlas V's because it doesn't have an LEO capacity figure for the 401? Reading some Delta II manifest lists - this sounds like it was pulled from the D2 manifest and moved to the Atlas V. Even the 401 will be an overperformance unless the design has bloated by a factor of 2 - is a secondary payload going to ride as well? This might have been the last D2 launch - so it seems the end for that vehicle is coming sooner that we might have thought. Doug |
|
|
Oct 6 2007, 08:10 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 599 Joined: 26-August 05 Member No.: 476 |
What can be inferred from this selection? Gee, you're the one with the inside view. An outsider like me might wonder if it was cheaper to move to the more expensive launcher vs. shutting down of the Delta II production line later and keeping the Vandenberg pad warm for the year or 2 after the launch preceding Landsat DCM (which I thought was the last manifested Delta II mission). I am guessing the Delta II production line is still active. With an earlier shutdown, there may be some expensive long lead hardware that will be scrapped. But that's business. |
|
|
Oct 6 2007, 02:49 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 321 Joined: 6-April 06 From: Cape Canaveral Member No.: 734 |
Gee, you're the one with the inside view. An outsider like me might wonder if it was cheaper to move to the more expensive launcher vs. shutting down of the Delta II production line later and keeping the Vandenberg pad warm for the year or 2 after the launch preceding Landsat DCM (which I thought was the last manifested Delta II mission). I am guessing the Delta II production line is still active. With an earlier shutdown, there may be some expensive long lead hardware that will be scrapped. But that's business. It was a rhetorical question The line is active but all the subcontracted hardware was delivered years ago. Keeping an integration, launch team, and pad active costs big bucks and the lost of skills may be significant |
|
|
Oct 8 2007, 09:37 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 599 Joined: 26-August 05 Member No.: 476 |
Future Discovery and Mars Scout missions will face increased launch costs if they have to buy an Atlas 5 or Delta 4 instead a Delta 2 7925. Here's hoping that Falcon 9 will be successful and reliable. Higher mass margins than a Delta 2 7925 at lower cost would be a boon for future Discovery / Mars Scout missions.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 3rd June 2024 - 10:20 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |