Rev 61 Enceladus (March 12 2008) |
Rev 61 Enceladus (March 12 2008) |
Mar 26 2008, 09:24 PM
Post
#91
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 655 Joined: 22-January 06 Member No.: 655 |
I'm ashamed in the presence of you chemists.
|
|
|
Mar 26 2008, 09:28 PM
Post
#92
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 2785 Joined: 10-November 06 From: Pasadena, CA Member No.: 1345 |
space.com article on Enceladus is out: http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/0803...yby-update.html
-Mike -------------------- Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
|
|
|
Mar 26 2008, 10:59 PM
Post
#93
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 3233 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
-------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
Mar 26 2008, 11:55 PM
Post
#94
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 2785 Joined: 10-November 06 From: Pasadena, CA Member No.: 1345 |
Emily's article regarding today's briefing on Enceladus: http://planetary.org/news/2008/0326_Cassin...tes_Like_a.html
Nicely written, Emily! -Mike -------------------- Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
|
|
|
Mar 27 2008, 01:14 AM
Post
#95
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8784 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
You got that right, Mike. Superb work, Emily, written in such a way that even a humble artificial intelligence such as myself can understand it all!
The cometary compositional similarity is interesting. Almost begs the question of whether something unexpected (heating) happened to them rather then something funny about Enceladus. I can't see any possibility of Enceladus being a captured body. -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Mar 27 2008, 04:08 AM
Post
#96
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 541 Joined: 17-November 05 From: Oklahoma Member No.: 557 |
I would dearly love to see some 10m resolution (or better!) NAC photos of the hottest areas of those tiger stripes, along with the WAC context shots. I know they plan some high resolution views in the next flyby, but I haven't yet read just how high the resolution will be. Hope their plans for the next flyby work. The 15 year night cometh soon.
|
|
|
Mar 27 2008, 07:05 AM
Post
#97
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2228 Joined: 1-December 04 From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA Member No.: 116 |
Can one of you astrobiololgy or icy body chemical types comment? I read the headlines noting the discovery of "complex organics," but the published spectrograph displays the heaviest broad peak centering around 40 Daltons. I wouldn't normally describe molecules of this weight range as "complex."
Are molecules heavier than the C2/CN/CO range typically considered complex by space scientists? I noted that Emily's blog entry stated that "At higher masses, not shown on the graph above, "we saw more complex compounds, like propyne, propane, maybe even acetonitrile, and then we saw things even more complex. But they were so weak in signal that we didn't venture an identification." Propane and propyne should have appeared on that graph, since its X-axis goes up to 50 Daltons. Was that data simply erased from the publically released spectrograph? -------------------- ...Tom
I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast. |
|
|
Mar 27 2008, 07:24 AM
Post
#98
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2530 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 321 |
The cometary compositional similarity is interesting. Almost begs the question of whether something unexpected (heating) happened to them rather then something funny about Enceladus. I can't see any possibility of Enceladus being a captured body. Yeah, is what we're seeing between comets and Enceladus anything but ices + one-time heating to drive a little chemistry? It doesn't look to me any more remarkable than the fact that SiO2 exists in the rocks of Earth, Moon, and Mars or that N2 exists in the atmospheres of Venus, Earth, and Mars. You put the same elements together, and you usually get the same compounds. |
|
|
Mar 27 2008, 12:04 PM
Post
#99
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 41 Joined: 11-April 07 From: London, U.K. Member No.: 1957 |
Yeah, is what we're seeing between comets and Enceladus anything but ices + one-time heating to drive a little chemistry? It doesn't look to me any more remarkable than the fact that SiO2 exists in the rocks of Earth, Moon, and Mars or that N2 exists in the atmospheres of Venus, Earth, and Mars. You put the same elements together, and you usually get the same compounds. Exactly - thankyou. My view is that the 'comet' label - whether it was meant to or not - connotes some suggestion that the organics are primordial. However, the heat flux and plume activity strongly suggest active chemical synthesis (a la Matson), which (to my feeble mind) is more astrobiologically interesting. |
|
|
Mar 27 2008, 01:04 PM
Post
#100
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8784 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
I would dearly love to see some 10m resolution (or better!) NAC photos of the hottest areas of those tiger stripes... My thoughts exactly. I strongly suspect that the emission areas are very localized, extremely narrow, and MUCH warmer than their immediate surroundings, which are presumably experiencing secondary heating... the actual vents have temps certainly exceeding 273 deg K. -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Mar 27 2008, 01:23 PM
Post
#101
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
... the actual vents have temps certainly exceeding 273 deg K. Ummm... I'm sorry, I don't understand that. How much is that in Fahrenheits? That's obviously the only allowed scale, given yesterday's news conference... On a more serious note, a question for John Spencer: Is the new highest temperature the average over the sensor footprint, or was it extrapolated to the actual width of the tiger stripes (so the average temperature is actually lower than stated in the press release)? -------------------- |
|
|
Mar 27 2008, 02:50 PM
Post
#102
|
|
Senior Member Group: Admin Posts: 4763 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Glendale, AZ Member No.: 197 |
How much is that in Fahrenheits? One of the fun things about Google is that you can convert anything to anything else. Type in 273K in F. and it will come back 31.7. If you are using the Google browser tool bar you don't even have to hit enter. The drop-down suggestion will give you the answer without leaving the page you are on. Its amazing how many odd units they take into account. Try 40 furlongs in nautical miles. 10 Hands in decimeters. 50,000 milliseconds in fortnights. Warning: you could waste a lot of time on this. -------------------- If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
|
|
|
Mar 27 2008, 03:00 PM
Post
#103
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 2785 Joined: 10-November 06 From: Pasadena, CA Member No.: 1345 |
One of the fun things about Google is that you can convert anything to anything else. Type in 273K in F. and it will come back 31.7. If you are using the Google browser tool bar you don't even have to hit enter. The drop-down suggestion will give you the answer without leaving the page you are on. Its amazing how many odd units they take into account. Try 40 furlongs in nautical miles. 10 Hands in decimeters. 50,000 milliseconds in fortnights. Warning: you could waste a lot of time on this. My favorite is that Google Earth can measure distances in Smoots. The irony that Oliver Smoot was head of American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the president of of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) is beautiful. [/off-topic witicism] -------------------- Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
|
|
|
Mar 27 2008, 03:02 PM
Post
#104
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
I was being sarcastic up there, but I'm glad - this Google tip is awesome! That's much faster than googling for "fahrenheit to celsius converter" or such.
Thanks, EGD! -------------------- |
|
|
Mar 27 2008, 03:16 PM
Post
#105
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14433 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
tWarning: you could waste a lot of time on this. 100 (meters per hour) = 515 090.655 smoots per year 55 mph = 242 hands per second (500 million miles) per (6 months) = 167 316.677 feet per second 240 000 (square feet) = 7 698.81934 sq smoots This is important stuff!! |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 5th June 2024 - 03:30 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |