IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

37 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Post Solar Conjunction/Santorini Study Drive, The second leg in our Journey to Endeavor Crater
jamescanvin
post Jan 1 2009, 03:58 PM
Post #31


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



And suspiciously named 'pancam_drive_dir_4x1_L2R2' as well. smile.gif

Of course just because drive direction images have been taken is no guarantee that we are leaving soon. The view is unlikely to change much however long we stay. wink.gif


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RoverDriver
post Jan 2 2009, 05:40 AM
Post #32


Member
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 976
Joined: 29-September 06
From: Pasadena, CA - USA
Member No.: 1200



QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Jan 1 2009, 07:58 AM) *
And suspiciously named 'pancam_drive_dir_4x1_L2R2' as well. smile.gif

Of course just because drive direction images have been taken is no guarantee that we are leaving soon. The view is unlikely to change much however long we stay. wink.gif


On 1759 we sequenced the ffirst RAT Brush since using the IDD as a 4 DOF arm. There were some questions about the activity and in case we had decided not to go ahead with the brush we would have been ready to drive off instead. Since we did not have drive direction PANCAMs and the NAVCAMS were from the previous location (I know, just less than a meter away) I had requested a set to be ready to drive.

I don't know when we will be ready to drive, but I would be surprised to see us drive off in less than a week.

Paolo


--------------------
Disclaimer: all opinions, ideas and information included here are my own,and should not be intended to represent opinion or policy of my employer.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jan 2 2009, 08:27 AM
Post #33


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8784
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Santorini confirmed as a meteorite:

http://www.planetary.org/news/2008/1231_Ma..._Update_As.html


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gray
post Jan 2 2009, 05:15 PM
Post #34


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 242
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Ohio, USA
Member No.: 34



nprev,
I couldn't get the link to work, but here's an excerpt from the post:

"As Opportunity returned to its normal schedule following solar conjunction, it continued its close-up investigation of Santorini taking measurements with its alpha-particle X-ray spectrometer (APXS) and some close-up pictures with its Micrcoscopic Imager (MI). The cobble, Squyres announced this week, turns out to be another meteorite, a type of stony iron meteorite called a mesosiderite, basically “a dead ringer” for Santa Catarina and Barberton. “You don’t see this type of meteorite very often on Earth, but of the four meteorites we’ve found at Meridiani Planum, three are like this,” Squyres pointed out. “They are so similar to one another that we suspect they may be pieces of the same thing.”
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jan 2 2009, 06:31 PM
Post #35


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8784
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Oh, my apologies; I screwed up that link copy! This one works.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jan 2 2009, 07:50 PM
Post #36


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10166
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Here's James's recent pan in a polar format with a more map-like geometry than the one posted in the original thread (now closed). North is at the top.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jan 2 2009, 07:58 PM
Post #37


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10166
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



... and another one more stretched out...

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Jan 3 2009, 05:48 AM
Post #38


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Jan 2 2009, 01:50 PM) *
Here's James's recent pan in a polar format with a more map-like geometry than the one posted in the original thread (now closed). North is at the top.
Thanks. I liked that one very much. smile.gif


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jan 4 2009, 04:16 AM
Post #39


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10166
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Here's another view derived from James's panorama. This is Victoria, seen with a very large vertical stretch. Old-timers will recall the big debate on UMSF during the approach to Victoria - was the "beacon" (a rock on the top of Cape St. Mary) on the near side or the far side? Parallax soon showed it had to be the near side. But from this perspective we see why it had to be like that. Victoria formed on a slope, so its rim slopes. The near side is significantly higher than the far side.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Jan 4 2009, 08:32 AM
Post #40


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Great job Phil!
Cape St Mary was clearly visible without stretching but in this view there is enough S/N to distinguish the whole crater from the much further distant terrain.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Zvezdichko_*
post Jan 4 2009, 11:07 AM
Post #41





Guests






Some new microscopic images from Oppy:

http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...ger/2009-01-01/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
glennwsmith
post Jan 5 2009, 03:28 AM
Post #42


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 233
Joined: 21-April 05
Member No.: 328



Darn, Zvezdichko, it's good to see those blueberries again! And maybe not so bad from a scientific standpoint, either -- while it's good, on the one hand, to be able to observe a variety of phenomenon, it's also good -- especially on a world we are exploring for the first time! -- to be able to establish a baseline and have some familiar "landmarks" -- almost like the trail of crumbs that Hansel and Gretel followed!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Juramike
post Jan 5 2009, 03:54 AM
Post #43


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



The blueberries here are a tad puzzling.

From the past discussions, I'd gotten the notion that rock ablation leaves blueberries as residue, then a layer of blueberries armors up the surface and prevents further erosion. So, I woulda thunk that blueberries WOULD NOT be found in areas with big drifts.

(Unless maybe the big drifts are frozen and the blueberry armoring has now halted erosion, even if there were stronger winds.)

Call me clueless.... unsure.gif



--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jan 5 2009, 04:42 AM
Post #44


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10166
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



There might be a few blueberries here, maybe from Victoria ejecta, but many of these chunks are not blueberries. There's quite a range of sizes and shapes.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Jan 5 2009, 04:50 AM
Post #45


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



Also, these MIs look suspiciously like the MIs I recall from the dark soils north of Victoria (in the deposition vs. sweeping investigations). Are we certain these are MIs from recent sols? And not just old images being flushed from the flash?

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

37 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd May 2024 - 02:52 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.