MESSENGER ARRIVES, Mercury Orbit Insertion |
MESSENGER ARRIVES, Mercury Orbit Insertion |
Mar 29 2011, 01:13 PM
Post
#76
|
|
Forum Contributor Group: Members Posts: 1374 Joined: 8-February 04 From: North East Florida, USA. Member No.: 11 |
I am curious about the orbital period of the MESSENGER spacecraft. Is it exactly 12 hours? If so, how was it chosen? "The MESSENGER team designed the orbit to optimize the scientific yield of the mission and data transfer to Earth, while addressing thermal environment concerns.". MESSENGER spends most of the time away from the surface to transmit data back to earth, and not to overheat due to reflected heat. |
|
|
Mar 29 2011, 01:59 PM
Post
#77
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 544 Joined: 17-November 05 From: Oklahoma Member No.: 557 |
"Finnegan told Spaceflight Now the spacecraft is in an orbit with a closest approach 128.5 miles above Mercury's surface and a high point of 9,482.7 miles. The orbit is inclined 82.5 degrees to Mercury's equator and it takes MESSENGER more than 12 hours to complete one circuit of the planet, according to Doppler tracking data."
So it's more than twelve hours, but they don't say how much more. |
|
|
Mar 29 2011, 04:30 PM
Post
#78
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 11-April 09 From: Sweden Member No.: 4726 |
|
|
|
Mar 29 2011, 04:41 PM
Post
#79
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10226 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Twelve hours period, with a major data downlink every other orbit, would simplify operations by having the same DSN coverage each day.
From the mission design page: "After MESSENGER arrives in the primary science orbit, small forces, such solar radiation pressure – the force exerted by sunlight - slowly change the spacecraft's orbit. Although these small forces have little effect on MESSENGER's 12-hour orbit period, they can increase the spacecraft's minimum altitude, orbit inclination, and latitude of the surface point below MESSENGER's minimum altitude. Left uncorrected, the increase in the spacecraft's minimum altitude would prevent satisfactory completion of certain science goals. To keep this minimum altitude below 500 kilometers (310 miles), propulsive maneuvers must occur in pairs once every Mercury year - every 88 days. The first maneuver in each pair increases the orbit period to 12 hours, 15 minutes by speeding up the spacecraft at its closest distance from Mercury. Two-and-a-half orbits later a maneuver at the farthest distance from Mercury slows the spacecraft just enough to adjust the orbit period back to 12 hours and return the minimum altitude to 200 kilometers (124 miles). Because the sunshade must protect the main part of the spacecraft from direct sunlight during propulsive maneuvers, the timing of these maneuvers is limited to a few days when Mercury is near the same point in its orbit as it was at Mercury orbit insertion." So the current period might not be exactly 12 hours but that's immaterial, the intention is to keep adjusting it to stay around 12 hours all the time (and the correct altitude etc.). Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Mar 29 2011, 05:20 PM
Post
#80
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
"Finnegan told Spaceflight Now the spacecraft is in an orbit with a closest approach 128.5 miles above Mercury's surface and a high point of 9,482.7 miles. Those orbital parameters translate to 12 hours 4 minutes period if I got it right. You can never tell with "miles"... -------------------- |
|
|
Mar 29 2011, 08:21 PM
Post
#81
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1452 Joined: 26-July 08 Member No.: 4270 |
-------------------- -- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
|
|
|
Mar 29 2011, 08:26 PM
Post
#82
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1075 Joined: 21-September 07 From: Québec, Canada Member No.: 3908 |
Messenger took 363 images after that first one. More images to be posted tomorrow at 2 pm EDT.
|
|
|
Mar 29 2011, 08:50 PM
Post
#83
|
|
IMG to PNG GOD Group: Moderator Posts: 2254 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Near fire and ice Member No.: 38 |
The image is centered at approximately 15°E and 55°S. This is a major improvement over earlier imaging coverage in this area and of course there are going to be narrow angle images as well. At a quick glance nothing that looks especially interesting. There are fairly strong contrast/brightness variations associated with some of the craters. Many scarps. And there is an interesting looking crater plus some associated features at (280,255).
|
|
|
Mar 29 2011, 09:00 PM
Post
#84
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
Looks good, nice to see the WAC behaving as if nothing happened.
-------------------- |
|
|
Mar 29 2011, 09:23 PM
Post
#85
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 3241 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
Here is the image laid on top of the released footprint map. The blue outline is the area that was blank on the map to this point. The blue dot is the south pole.
-------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
Mar 29 2011, 09:29 PM
Post
#86
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 11-April 09 From: Sweden Member No.: 4726 |
|
|
|
Mar 29 2011, 09:39 PM
Post
#87
|
||
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10226 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Very rough fit of the image to a colorized version of the pre-orbit mosaic, south polar view. (only adding the bit which improves on the previous coverage)
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
||
Mar 30 2011, 03:56 AM
Post
#88
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 754 Joined: 9-February 07 Member No.: 1700 |
I read an article saying thrusters have to be fired every few months to keep MESSENGER from floating into a higher orbit by the Sun's gravity. I don't get that, since it's in a polar orbit.
Oh, wait -- the Sun is ALWAYS tugging on things, and at the proximity of Mercury, it gets taken into account throughout the orbit, on a scale similar to instances where the ISS fires thrusters to stay at altitude versus miniscule atmospheric drag. Okay, I get that. When it doesn't have any fuel left, will it get sucked into the Sun? LOL! The mission science is just beginning, I'm already wondering what's going to happen to our intrepid spacecraft when it runs out of fuel! |
|
|
Mar 30 2011, 04:04 AM
Post
#89
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 399 Joined: 28-August 07 From: San Francisco Member No.: 3511 |
It really is astounding science, all hail MESSENGER team,
cue: heavy orchestral sounds for MESSENGER images -------------------- 'She drove until the wheels fell off...'
|
|
|
Mar 30 2011, 04:44 AM
Post
#90
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1452 Joined: 26-July 08 Member No.: 4270 |
When it doesn't have any fuel left, will it get sucked into the Sun? The plan is for an impact on Mercury. But hypothetically, if they were to refrain from adjusting the orbit, and if MESSENGER left Mercury's hill sphere, it would orbit the sun. -------------------- -- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd September 2024 - 10:54 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |