IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

104 Pages V  « < 76 77 78 79 80 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Post Conjunction: Santa Maria to Cape York, The Journey to 'Spirit Point'
SFJCody
post Jul 29 2011, 03:25 AM
Post #1156


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 813
Joined: 8-February 04
From: Arabia Terra
Member No.: 12



Another move on 2670?

QUOTE
02670 p1154.01 0 0 0 0 0 0 front_hazcam_idd_unstow_doc
02670 p1165.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 flhaz_IDD_check_subframe_2bpp_pri_41
02670 p1211.03 0 0 0 0 0 0 ultimate_front_haz_1_bpp_pri_15
02670 p1254.02 0 0 0 0 0 0 front_haz_fault_pri15_4bpp
02670 p1311.07 0 0 0 0 0 0 rear_haz_ultimate_1_bpp_crit15
02670 p1354.01 0 0 0 0 0 0 rear_haz_fault_pri15_4bpp
02670 p1977.22 0 0 0 0 0 0 navcam_3x1_az_162_3_bpp
02670 p2111.06 0 0 0 0 0 0 pancam_drive_direction_3x1_L2R12
02670 p2111.06 0 0 0 0 0 0 pancam_cal_targ_L234567Rall
02670 p2571.27 0 0 0 0 0 0 pancam_Great_Detached_Reef_L257R2
02670 p2572.27 0 0 0 0 0 0 pancam_Madeira_Island_L257R2
02670 p2573.27 0 0 0 0 0 0 pancam_Gibraltar_L234567Rall
02670 p2601.05 0 0 0 0 0 0 pancam_tau_L78R48
02670 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eluchil
post Jul 29 2011, 04:23 AM
Post #1157


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 36
Joined: 14-July 06
Member No.: 972



QUOTE (MoreInput @ Jul 28 2011, 07:18 PM) *
Wan't to know how the rover planning day was for this drive? http://opportunityendeavour.blogspot.com/ from Matt Lenda.


I love the over the shoulder view of the great MER engineers. I assume I wasn't the only one, seeing him as RP-1, rooting for Paolo to complete and deliver his sequences on time. As I've learned from Scott's blog and other sources IDD work may not be as glamorous as 120m drives but can be annoyingly finicky to code.

It's amazing how not only do we humanize the rovers whose journeys we have followed all these years, but we feel that we share in the triumphs of the scientists and engineers who built and operated them. MER has done a stupendous job of outreach. Even though I have never met one of them in person, I have been privileged to share in the (continuing) adventure of exploration. Thank you MER!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nix
post Jul 29 2011, 07:15 AM
Post #1158


Chief Assistant
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1409
Joined: 5-January 05
From: Ierapetra, Greece
Member No.: 136



QUOTE (marswiggle @ Jul 29 2011, 05:01 AM) *
The dark flat feature in the new navcam image really seems oddly flat and featureless for CY, which makes me think it could alternatively be our first glimpse of the dark material that is filling the north-center bottom of Endeavour, lying higher than the margins and the south part. ...........


The anaglyph does seem to show a crater on top of a hill.. which makes me think of Spirit Point.


--------------------
photographer, space imagery enthusiast, proud father and partner, and geek.


http://500px.com/sacred-photons &
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Jul 29 2011, 07:25 AM
Post #1159


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



QUOTE (marswiggle @ Jul 29 2011, 04:01 AM) *
The dark flat feature in the new navcam image really seems oddly flat and featureless for CY, which makes me think it could alternatively be our first glimpse of the dark material that is filling the north-center bottom of Endeavour, lying higher than the margins and the south part.


Yeah, maybe, however my thoughts are the other way around: it looks exactly as flat and featureless as I was expecting for CY and I wouldn't expect a distant (and hence very large) feature to be so flat and straight.

QUOTE (Nix @ Jul 29 2011, 08:15 AM) *
The anaglyph does seem to show a crater on top of a hill.. which makes me think of Spirit Point.


I think we can still only see the northern half of CY. SP is still over the horizon at the moment.


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Jul 29 2011, 10:23 AM
Post #1160





Guests






QUOTE (SFJCody @ Jul 29 2011, 04:25 AM) *
Another move on 2670?


From that blog, sounds like they are going back to something they drove past.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jul 29 2011, 11:00 AM
Post #1161


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



No, I think the "back up to the second MI stack" reference means they were asked to re-take some microscopic imager pictures, it's not a drive back to a previous target.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Oersted_*
post Jul 29 2011, 11:36 AM
Post #1162





Guests






QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Jul 29 2011, 09:25 AM) *
I think we can still only see the northern half of CY. SP is still over the horizon at the moment.


Ah, so you don't say "under the horizon" in English? - What a wonderful language... smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Jul 29 2011, 12:36 PM
Post #1163


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



I wouldn't personally have said "under the horizon" but over/below/beyond would all be equally acceptable to me. (Note English was never my strong point!)

Back on topic, Stu is right I didn't see anything to suggest they are going back. Furthermore as new drive direction pancams are planned I think tosols drive is more than a bump to reposition at this outcrop. I'm betting on a longish drive smile.gif and if we make it past the little crater ahead I think most of CY could come into view. An exciting afternoon/evening ahead!


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jul 29 2011, 03:09 PM
Post #1164


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4252
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Jul 29 2011, 08:25 AM) *
it looks exactly as flat and featureless as I was expecting for CY
Agreed. Also, remember the pancams we had of CY on 2665 - that's clearly a local feature, not far rim. The far rim is so far away (22km!) that even a jet black feature would appear light grey because of all the haze in the air right now.

(BTW, "over the horizon" is used in a similar sense as "over the hill", ie "you'd have to go over the hill to get there". But of course the quirks of English could take up a whole thread, or a whole forum...)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Matt Lenda
post Jul 29 2011, 03:54 PM
Post #1165


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 98
Joined: 17-July 11
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 6066



QUOTE (Eluchil @ Jul 28 2011, 09:23 PM) *
I love the over the shoulder view of the great MER engineers. I assume I wasn't the only one, seeing him as RP-1, rooting for Paolo to complete and deliver his sequences on time. As I've learned from Scott's blog and other sources IDD work may not be as glamorous as 120m drives but can be annoyingly finicky to code.

It's amazing how not only do we humanize the rovers whose journeys we have followed all these years, but we feel that we share in the triumphs of the scientists and engineers who built and operated them. MER has done a stupendous job of outreach. Even though I have never met one of them in person, I have been privileged to share in the (continuing) adventure of exploration. Thank you MER!
rolleyes.gif It's a fun gig!

QUOTE (Stu @ Jul 29 2011, 04:00 AM) *
No, I think the "back up to the second MI stack" reference means they were asked to re-take some microscopic imager pictures, it's not a drive back to a previous target.

This is correct. We did a set of four 1x1x5 MI stacks.

For sol 2670, I believe they planned a drive that included a "back up and take a peek at the IDD'd targets" and then a 100-meter or so drive. Though I can't quite remember. I'll check in later today. (on my *off* day!)

EDIT: They planned only about 70 meters. This was intentional -- they wanted to look at a filled-in crater.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jul 29 2011, 04:35 PM
Post #1166


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Welcome, Matt! About time you joined us! laugh.gif

And thanks again for the great blog you're now writing. It's giving us some great insights.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jul 29 2011, 04:40 PM
Post #1167


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4252
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (Matt Lenda @ Jul 29 2011, 04:54 PM) *
they wanted to look at a filled-in crater.
Thanks for the update, Matt! That'd be Stu's "Almost There" crater, with the big dune on one side.

Regardless of how we define "arrival" at Endeavour, I say after the next drive it'll be official: We're almost there! laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Jul 29 2011, 05:51 PM
Post #1168


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



I had dinner with two icy moons scientists last night. They had no idea that Opportunity's finally at her destination. I filled them in smile.gif

Welcome, Matt!


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
marswiggle
post Jul 29 2011, 06:04 PM
Post #1169


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 111
Joined: 14-March 05
From: Vastitas Borealis
Member No.: 193



To clarify my line of thought re the navcam observation: yes we have indeed seen the top of CY, that's not questionable. But we have since moved considerably to the southeastern direction and the high part is now rather far to the left of the 'Cyclops' crater. Sol 2667 navcam for comparison. So we should now have an unobstructed view to Endeavour over the lower part of CY, which according to relief maps and anaglyphs should not rise too many inches above our current level on the plain, nor be visible separately of the plains.
But I am not going to waste everyone's time by pursuing this any more before the new pancams will solve the problem!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Jul 29 2011, 06:31 PM
Post #1170


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



Looks like ~65m from the tracking data.


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

104 Pages V  « < 76 77 78 79 80 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th June 2024 - 04:49 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.