IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

8 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 > »   
Closed TopicStart new topic
MSL Approach Phase
Guest_Oersted_*
post Jul 12 2012, 01:36 PM
Post #61





Guests






Odyssey in safe mode again, acc. to Paolo (JPL rover driver) in the Opportunity forum...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Jul 16 2012, 05:18 AM
Post #62


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2922
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



Pre_landing telecon tonight at 10AM Pacific: http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/jul/H...Prelanding.html
I'm feeling like I'm back to december 2003 for Spirit's prelanding telecom smile.gif
We're getting close wheel.gif wheel.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post Jul 16 2012, 02:05 PM
Post #63


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



QUOTE (climber @ Jul 16 2012, 01:18 AM) *
Pre_landing telecon tonight at 10AM Pacific: http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/jul/H...Prelanding.html
I'm feeling like I'm back to december 2003 for Spirit's prelanding telecom smile.gif
We're getting close wheel.gif wheel.gif


Here's the Spirit pre-landing press conference, held on the day of the landing:

http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/179768-1


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Jul 16 2012, 03:11 PM
Post #64


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



QUOTE (climber @ Jul 15 2012, 10:18 PM) *
Pre_landing telecon tonight at 10AM Pacific:

Don't do that to me before I have had my morning coffee.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
akuo
post Jul 16 2012, 07:32 PM
Post #65


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 470
Joined: 24-March 04
From: Finland
Member No.: 63



Missed the press conf live, but its already visible as a recording here: http://www.ustream.tv/nasajpl

Watching the recording at the moment, but I find something strange in the released information and images. The press kit specifies the landing ellipse as 20x25km, and I remember the graphics before having a lot more circular ellipse. Now, looking at the press kit and some released images, I again see a quite elongated ellipse:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/msl/mult...a/pia15690.html

There are no scale there, so its difficult to understand the scale of the ellipse. Anyway, has the predicted ellipse become more elongated, and if so, is it more or less accurate than before?



--------------------
Antti Kuosmanen
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RoverDriver
post Jul 16 2012, 07:40 PM
Post #66


Member
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 976
Joined: 29-September 06
From: Pasadena, CA - USA
Member No.: 1200



20x25 Km is the nominal size for the ellipse. I don't have the most recent values but I believe it is in the 21x7Km range. I will find out and edit this post.

Paolo


--------------------
Disclaimer: all opinions, ideas and information included here are my own,and should not be intended to represent opinion or policy of my employer.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jul 16 2012, 07:42 PM
Post #67


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10177
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



The ellipse was reduced in size a few weeks ago:

http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/images/?ImageID=3855

Phil



--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
akuo
post Jul 16 2012, 07:51 PM
Post #68


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 470
Joined: 24-March 04
From: Finland
Member No.: 63



Ok, I haven't followed the official MSL site keenly enough:)

7km wide ellipse, that is really excellent.


--------------------
Antti Kuosmanen
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post Jul 16 2012, 08:15 PM
Post #69


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



QUOTE (akuo @ Jul 16 2012, 03:32 PM) *
Missed the press conf live, but its already visible as a recording here: http://www.ustream.tv/nasajpl


Thanks for the link--missed it too.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jul 16 2012, 10:23 PM
Post #70


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



21 x 7km is the size I used for the artwork smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post Jul 17 2012, 12:40 AM
Post #71


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



An important item from the press conference was that due to a malfunction on Odyssey, the first indication of a successful landing might not be until several hours after the landing. Odyssey would have been positioned to receive UHF transmissions from MSL and relay them immediately ("bent pipe" telemetry) , but if Odyssey can't be positioned as desired due to the reaction wheel problem, then MRO will store and forward the data 3-4 hours later. Mars Express will be below the horizon at landing, as will Earth. Odyssey could contact MSL on its next orbit about 1-2 hours after landing.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stewjack
post Jul 17 2012, 01:42 AM
Post #72


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 252
Joined: 5-May 05
From: Mississippi (USA)
Member No.: 379



QUOTE (jmknapp @ Jul 16 2012, 07:40 PM) *
Odyssey could contact MSL on its next orbit about 1-2 hours after landing.

That is the way I understood it from the press conference, however a BBC article suggests something different.
---
Nasa may miss Curiosity Mars rover's landing signal
By Jonathan Amos Science correspondent, BBC News

As things stand, Nasa could be waiting on Odyssey to make a late pass of the landing site, perhaps five to 10 minutes after the rover's planned touch down.

This (MSL Landing) is projected to be 22:31 PDT 5 August; .....snip...
"If Odyssey is not able to be moved and it still remains late, that means it will fly over [Curiosity] after the spacecraft has landed, and we presumably will [then] be able to see transmissions from it. It would be somewhere between 22:35 and 22:40 PDT," explained Pete Theisinger, the rover project manager at Nasa's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California.
---
Personally, I (in the CDT time zone) think I should plan for an all-niter.

Jack
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
brellis
post Jul 17 2012, 03:11 AM
Post #73


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 754
Joined: 9-February 07
Member No.: 1700



Dang it, I'm already half way through the first of the three bags of pistachios I bought for the PlanetFest thingy. Good thing there's a Trader Joe's on the way!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jul 17 2012, 03:17 AM
Post #74


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8784
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Just for clarity's sake, we're talking about delayed return of the full EDL data set as the worst-case scenario in this situation, correct?

Would hate to lose any of that; you only get one shot per landing to get it, and it's invariably quite valuable for future mission planning.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jul 17 2012, 03:38 AM
Post #75


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



The baseline plan was...

X-Band DTE
Tones up until just after 'chute deployment in the MER stule

UHF
Bent pipe relay 8kps via Mars Odyssey
Store and Forward from Entry to Landing 8kbps via MRO ( that we would get at about landing +4 to 5hrs or so )
And partial carrier only via MEX

Now - the only change is the bent pipe 'live' 8kbps telem via MODY is in jeopardy.

I bet they'll find the time between now and landing to re-tweak MODY's orbit, burn a bit of prop, and get it back in place for bent-pipe relay. There's several decades of prop margin onboard.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

8 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » 
Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd June 2024 - 05:54 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.