IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

33 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 6 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Journey to Mt Sharp - Part 4: Beyond the Kimberley, Sol 634 [May 19, '14] to 706 [Jul 31, '14]
atomoid
post May 25 2014, 09:14 AM
Post #46


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 866
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Member No.: 196



stitch of micro-graben from sol637 dirt shot sequence
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Floyd
post May 25 2014, 06:51 PM
Post #47


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 913
Joined: 4-September 06
From: Boston
Member No.: 1102



I guess with the holiday weekend we won't move towards or get any images of the large rocks/meteorites until Wednesday. Hard to wait sometimes...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James Sorenson
post May 26 2014, 10:34 AM
Post #48


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 691
Joined: 21-December 07
From: Clatskanie, Oregon
Member No.: 3988



Definitely a metal object! smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post May 26 2014, 10:50 AM
Post #49


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



Is there a compelling scientific reason for MSL to analyze an iron-nickel meteor further (drive over there, etc)?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post May 26 2014, 11:01 AM
Post #50


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2430
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



QUOTE (jmknapp @ May 26 2014, 06:50 PM) *
Is there a compelling scientific reason for MSL to analyze an iron-nickel meteor further (drive over there, etc)?

According to 'Midnight Planets' Curiosity is driving now (awaiting metadata) we will have to see where she is going smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
charborob
post May 26 2014, 12:05 PM
Post #51


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1074
Joined: 21-September 07
From: Québec, Canada
Member No.: 3908



Sol 637 mastcam 100 view of the two "rocks":
Attached Image

If these are meteorites (as they appear to be), isn't it quite a coincidence that they are so close together? Unless they are part of a larger body that broke up either on its way down or upon impact.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post May 26 2014, 03:47 PM
Post #52


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



QUOTE (PaulH51 @ May 26 2014, 06:01 AM) *
According to 'Midnight Planets' Curiosity is driving now (awaiting metadata) we will have to see where she is going smile.gif


The SPICE position file was finally updated this morning after several days, but it just has a couple of of short bumps yesterday (sol 640), maybe spurious.

I was just wondering given the overall aim of the effort (characterizing the "lacustrine" history of the crater, etc.), if an extraterrestrial rock is on point.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mhoward
post May 26 2014, 03:52 PM
Post #53


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3431
Joined: 11-August 04
From: USA
Member No.: 98



The bumps aren't spurious (I don't think); typical wheel examination (see bottom of page).

Gorgeous (and probably practical in some way?) early morning lighting, too.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post May 26 2014, 03:57 PM
Post #54


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10183
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



The short bumps are not spurious, they are doing wheel imaging with small rotations between images.

Checking whether these rocks are meteorites is a worthy goal - not enough for a long stop, but I would suggest it would be useful to get ChemCam LIBS data on them to compare with APXS which we have for the Meridiani meteorites. As for clustering, Spirit also say 2 or possibly 3 meteorites at Low Ridge Haven, and at Meridiani Shelter Island and Mackinac Island were also close together. Atmospheric breakup seems quite likely.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post May 26 2014, 04:01 PM
Post #55


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10183
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



These are circular views from sols 636 and 637 showing recent drives and surrounding features.

Phil

636:
Attached Image



637:
Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post May 26 2014, 10:35 PM
Post #56


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1045
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



QUOTE (jmknapp @ May 26 2014, 10:50 AM) *
Is there a compelling scientific reason for MSL to analyze an iron-nickel meteor further (drive over there, etc)?

Assuming that they are, as they seem, iron meteorites then the impact must have occurred when there was a reasonably thick atmosphere and an appreciable depth of material (sandstone / mud / water) above their present level since there is no trace of impact excavation and no appreciable fragmentation, although the original could perhaps have split in half, potentially just before impact. So a closer examination could give an important data point on the environment post impact. Besides, how could an entity named Curiosity fail to have a quick look?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
anticitizen2
post May 26 2014, 10:47 PM
Post #57


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 201
Joined: 16-December 13
Member No.: 7067



Hopefully ChemCam got some good distance zaps in, because that rock (meteorite for sure?) is now far in the rear-view mirror!

(just thumbnails for now)

I've been surprised by how far west we've headed - I guess that way lies flatter ground for longer drives. And softer ground - because unlike Opportunity's solar arrays, the wheels aren't getting any better
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chuckclark
post May 26 2014, 11:12 PM
Post #58


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 140
Joined: 20-November 07
Member No.: 3967



QUOTE (serpens @ May 26 2014, 05:35 PM) *
. . . reasonably thick atmosphere . . . appreciable depth of material . . . no trace of impact excavation . . . no appreciable fragmentation, . . . closer examination could give an important data point . . . . Besides, how could an entity named Curiosity fail to have a quick look?


Applause!

(Is the obvious really obvious until someone states it precisely and clearly?)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post May 27 2014, 12:05 AM
Post #59


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



Looks like 42m to the northwest--Murray Buttes beckons?

Drive 185


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post May 27 2014, 12:06 AM
Post #60


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10183
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Very quick circular pan and sketch map - proper map update tomorrow.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

33 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 4th June 2024 - 11:11 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.