Juno, perijove 10, December 16, 2017 |
Juno, perijove 10, December 16, 2017 |
Dec 18 2017, 12:15 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
Data of Juno's Perijove-10 are going to be downlinked.
Here is a tiny 6000-fold time-lapsed simulation from 2017-12-16T16:30:00.000 to 2017-12-16T20:00:00.000: It shows, that during approach, Jupiter's night side has come into JunoCam's field of view, first. Then there have been some interesting new perspectives, before Jupiter's south polar region has been in JunoCam's view during departure. The simulation is based on preliminary, and on some reconstructed SPICE data. Timing of actual image data differ from the stills of the above tiny simulation. |
|
|
Dec 18 2017, 01:40 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 102 Joined: 29-January 10 From: Poland Member No.: 5205 |
I can't wait for new pictures !
-------------------- Adam Hurcewicz from Poland
|
|
|
Dec 18 2017, 09:52 PM
Post
#3
|
|
IMG to PNG GOD Group: Moderator Posts: 2254 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Near fire and ice Member No.: 38 |
This is also interesting (from https://www.missionjuno.swri.edu/junocam/voting?id=8 ):
QUOTE We are also reducing the amount of compression for the closest images to minimize compression artifacts. The area around latitude 40 degrees north has been especially photogenic since Juno's arrival (I don't know if images of that area qualify as "closest images" though). |
|
|
Dec 18 2017, 10:17 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
Near closest approach, the contrast turned out to be pretty low during previous flybys, resulting in DCT block artifacts of approximately the size of potentially interesting features, and a slow flyby movie would also degrade in quality due to the visibility of the compression artifacts. Additionally, near the latitudes of the GRS, there seem to have formed large turbulent features before PJ9 that are worth images of good quality. The geometry of future perijoves will worsen for flyby animation purposes. So, this may by one of the last opportunities to take an according sequence.
Regarding observations of the polar CPCs, we'll likely get better results for the south than for the north due to image geometry and illumination. Regarding latitude: The correlation of time and latitude won't be as strict as it has been for early orbits. This is another reason, why voting for features on certain latitudes would be less applicable. |
|
|
Dec 18 2017, 10:33 PM
Post
#5
|
|
IMG to PNG GOD Group: Moderator Posts: 2254 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Near fire and ice Member No.: 38 |
|
|
|
Dec 18 2017, 10:46 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
Provided, Juno gets an extension until 2021, and the instruments will still be healthy, the answer is yes, the geometry will improve again.
|
|
|
Dec 19 2017, 10:03 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 146 Joined: 22-July 14 Member No.: 7220 |
|
|
|
Dec 19 2017, 11:07 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 146 Joined: 22-July 14 Member No.: 7220 |
|
|
|
Dec 20 2017, 03:16 AM
Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
With some delay, here my set of drafts of the first half of PJ-10 close-ups. The second half of the PJ-10 close-up images are still to be downlinked.
This version is rendered without 3D information; so the close-ups are misaligned a bit. Image #002 shows two of the moons, the larger one should be Io, according to the title. Might be, that there is more, but it's what I've seen at first glance. Of course, there are lots of energetic particle hits. |
|
|
Dec 20 2017, 11:20 AM
Post
#10
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 923 Joined: 10-November 15 Member No.: 7837 |
This already looks like an exceptional set Gerald...and the lack of artifacts on closest approach is also very promising.
Great early processing by Kevin as well! I can only imagine what Matt has up his sleeve... -------------------- |
|
|
Dec 20 2017, 01:13 PM
Post
#11
|
|||
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
A tiny animation of the RGB images available thus far:
And here a larger version of some of them, first #018, and #020: The images show some image noise, since they have been taken with TDI 1. There are also many energetic particle hits. Last night, I've simply been too tired to render reasonable products. A small glitch (forgot to copy&paste Juno's rotation period from the image adjustment batch into the rendering batch) prevented an overnight run. |
||
|
|||
Dec 20 2017, 01:16 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
|
|
|
Dec 20 2017, 01:21 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
|
|
|
Dec 20 2017, 01:23 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
|
|
|
Dec 20 2017, 01:29 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th September 2024 - 01:18 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |