IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

8 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Comet observation from Mars, comets close encounters to Mars in 2013 and 2014
monitorlizard
post Sep 27 2013, 11:37 AM
Post #61


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 234
Joined: 8-May 05
Member No.: 381



The 20 September 2013 issue of Science (page 1328) has what I hope is an example of sloppy reporting and not a revised estimate of comet 2013 A1 at Mars. The exact quote:

"In late 2014, comet 2013 A1 is expected to barrel into Mars, the kind of spectacle last witnessed when comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 bombarded Jupiter in 1994...comet 2013 A1 should kick up a massive dust cloud for Mangalyaan and MAVEN to feast their sensors on."

The article doesn't quote probabilities of an impact, just states it outright so I suspect it does not reflect current thinking.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greenish
post Sep 27 2013, 03:44 PM
Post #62


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 219
Joined: 14-November 11
From: Washington, DC
Member No.: 6237



Indeed, that's not consistent with the latest trajectories. The JPL small bodies database browser shows that the uncertainty is now down to 16 minutes in close approach using observations from Sept, and has increased to 5.8 sigma from an impact trajectory. The nominal distance is 134000 km, minimum 66400/max 201000 km (I think these are 3-sigma).

That's some surprisingly dramatic language for Science.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JohnVV
post Sep 27 2013, 08:56 PM
Post #63


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 890
Joined: 18-November 08
Member No.: 4489



For those interested
i posted a "preview" using the ISON and "siding spring" naif kernels
as seen from Gale Crater for both comets

all 3d renderings using Celestia
ISON
https://picasaweb.google.com/10269590129139...NFromGaleCrater

Siding Spring - renderings of the comet( random generated 3d mesh)
https://picasaweb.google.com/10269590129139...ngSpringC2013A1
the rover will have SOME VIEW
-- Comet rise on Oct 19 2014 from Gale


the config files can be found here
http://forum.celestialmatters.org/viewtopi...?f=18&t=578
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
scalbers
post Sep 28 2013, 03:41 PM
Post #64


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1625
Joined: 5-March 05
From: Boulder, CO
Member No.: 184



I get a magnitude for ISON of about +4.1 seen from Mars at closest approach, assuming +11.5 seen from Earth on Oct 1 2013.

For 2013 A1 "Siding Spring" in October 2014 I get about -7.8 magnitude as seen from Mars.


--------------------
Steve [ my home page and planetary maps page ]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Sep 29 2013, 12:13 PM
Post #65


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



Looks like Opportunity had a go at taking a navcam image of ISON yestersol (3441). No images available yet though.


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Deimos
post Sep 29 2013, 06:15 PM
Post #66


Martian Photographer
***

Group: Members
Posts: 352
Joined: 3-March 05
Member No.: 183



I get magnitude 5.5 from Mars, based on >13 from Earth at this time. And that'll be a bit spread out as seen from Mars. And through dust, for the rovers. Hard to say ISON would be more visible than, say, M31.

Siding Springs will be bright, but spread out--mostly, the surface brightness may not be even visible--except that for it, the nucleus can be detected by things other than HiRise.

I don't know about using Navcam, as opposed to Pancam, from MER. It is not nearly as sensitive, with a bit of neutral density coating.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Astro0
post Sep 30 2013, 07:54 AM
Post #67


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3108
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity - Sol 3441

It'd be nice if ISON were in there somewhere and someone could pull it out.
Lots of noise and cosmic ray strikes to filter through.



Six images:

1P433703396ESFC8MDP2730L1M1 3441 23:37:35 -78.9 330.2
1P433703436ESFC8MDP2730L1M1 3441 23:38:14 -79.0 330.9
1P433703536ESFC8MDP2730L1M1 3441 23:39:52 -79.2 332.7
1P433703576ESFC8MDP2730L1M1 3441 23:40:31 -79.3 333.5
1P433703676ESFC8MDP2730L1M1 3441 23:42:08 -79.4 335.4
1P433703716ESFC8MDP2730L1M1 3441 23:42:47 -79.5 336.2
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gerald
post Sep 30 2013, 01:36 PM
Post #68


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2346
Joined: 7-December 12
Member No.: 6780



This may or may not show ISON:
Attached Image

Attached Image
Subframes have been registered (including rotation 0.2 degrees).
Blur, appropriate stretching, and intersecting for the combined jpg, squeeze out a feature of the three longer-exposed images, that looks a little different from stars (different angle, possible relative motion, less sharp) and noise.
But it's hard to tell, whether it's a significant signal.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Sep 30 2013, 03:11 PM
Post #69


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



I'm sceptical that we're seeing anything. Here's my quick attempt at reducing noise by taking four differences of the three long-exposure frames, registering them, and averaging. Unfortunately the noise is so large that the result doesn't show stars much better than the original frames. Also, I didn't correct for field rotation, so that makes trails look a bit fuzzier away from centre.
Attached Image

Gerald's field is pretty much dead centre in this full frame view. I suspect we're just seeing noise. You'd need the original raw frames to subtract the noise properly.

Can anyone get an accurate position for ISON from planetarium software?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gerald
post Sep 30 2013, 06:19 PM
Post #70


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2346
Joined: 7-December 12
Member No.: 6780



FredK's image after enhancing the center of the largest object less bright than stars and brighter than background:
Attached Image

Intermediate processing steps here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
brellis
post Sep 30 2013, 06:58 PM
Post #71


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 754
Joined: 9-February 07
Member No.: 1700



Another probably silly question: can one of the orbiters point towards the comet?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
xflare
post Sep 30 2013, 07:11 PM
Post #72


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 282
Joined: 18-June 04
Member No.: 84



what time is closest approach to Mars?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Sep 30 2013, 07:32 PM
Post #73


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Closest approach for ISON shouldn't matter too much, since it's so far away. It will matter much more for next year's coment.

QUOTE (brellis @ Sep 30 2013, 07:58 PM) *
can one of the orbiters point towards the comet?
They are planning to point. Check out the description I linked to here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JohnVV
post Oct 1 2013, 08:26 PM
Post #74


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 890
Joined: 18-November 08
Member No.: 4489



QUOTE
what time is closest approach to Mars?

what one
ISON i am not sure
For C/2013 A1( siding spring ) I think it is about 18:30 UT on Oct 19 2014 give or take about 15 min .
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post Oct 2 2013, 02:25 AM
Post #75


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2079
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



HiRISE twitter claims that images will be down in the next day or so, and business as usual is going on there.

https://twitter.com/HiRISE
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

8 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th April 2024 - 02:03 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.