My personnal MER 3d software |
![]() ![]() |
My personnal MER 3d software |
![]()
Post
#166
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 656 Joined: 20-April 05 From: League City, Texas Member No.: 285 ![]() |
my personal auto-panorama, bassed on CAHVOR model ![]() test with sol 912 ... Nicely done ![]() |
|
|
![]()
Post
#167
|
|||
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 239 Joined: 20-April 05 From: Bruxelles, Belgium Member No.: 278 ![]() |
hi algorimancer,
you have already the solution for the panoramas it is the same technique which for the vertical one except that one needs exchange the plan by a sphere or a cylinder, calculates the intersions with a sphere or a cylinder instead of a plan… and you have your panorama ![]() I must acknowledge that it is you who my put on the way with your projection vertical:) opportunity sol 919 Vertical projection using CAHVOR model 1 cm per pixel 2.5 cm per pixel I do not have all yet made finished with projection vertical, I must still make blend between the frames and corrected gamma (as for the panorama) for the verticals I did not take yet into account the quaternion of the rover vector origin, it is what I code for the moment. I have also in my plan to make an automatic traversmap with the technique of projection vertical, but a little more advanced, instead of calculating all separately the verticals map, I them calculation all in same time, which enables me to make a filter on the pixels most significant (otherwise say by calculating the distance from the pixel with the rover location ) what I think will make a traversmap more significant, with more significant pixel, considering that more close to the rover ![]() I do not know if I were very clearly here ![]() ![]() -------------------- |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#168
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 656 Joined: 20-April 05 From: League City, Texas Member No.: 285 ![]() |
... I have also in my plan to make an automatic traversmap with the technique of projection vertical, but a little more advanced, instead of calculating all separately the verticals map, I them calculation all in same time, which enables me to make a filter on the pixels most significant (otherwise say by calculating the distance from the pixel with the rover location ) what I think will make a traversmap more significant, with more significant pixel, considering that more close to the rover ![]() I do not know if I were very clearly here ![]() ![]() Clear enough ![]() ![]() |
|
|
![]()
Post
#169
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2492 Joined: 15-January 05 From: center Italy Member No.: 150 ![]() |
unfortunately time is finite, and I don't have enough of it to do all the things I'd like to do. I know this issue ![]() So, I'm happy to see someone (Indian) is planning to make automatic traversmap with the vertical pojection technique and you want to make it in 3D... cannot ask for more! ![]() -------------------- I always think before posting! - Marco -
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#170
|
|||
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 239 Joined: 20-April 05 From: Bruxelles, Belgium Member No.: 278 ![]() |
quality is not very good yet, but this starts has to become correct:)
I must still take account of the slope of the rover and a best gamma correction, but I start has to become satisfied ![]() opportunity sol 919 ( 0.5 cm / pixel ) opportunity sol 919 ( 1 cm / pixel ) -------------------- |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#171
|
|
![]() Dublin Correspondent ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 1799 Joined: 28-March 05 From: Celbridge, Ireland Member No.: 220 ![]() |
Wow.
No seriously - those two projections are absolutely astonishing. They really do appear to have been taken by a camera looking directly down onto Opportunity. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#172
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 257 Joined: 18-December 04 Member No.: 123 ![]() |
-------------------- Turn the middle side topwise....TOPWISE!!
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#173
|
|||
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 239 Joined: 20-April 05 From: Bruxelles, Belgium Member No.: 278 ![]() |
it is not the most recent site, but it is rather a sympathetic image,
I take again some site to make the tests of my software, if somebody remember a sympathetic site… that he gives the sol number opportunity SOL 354 vertical projection generated with CAHVOR Model and same site - spheric projection generated with CAHVOR Model -------------------- |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#174
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 320 Joined: 19-June 04 Member No.: 85 ![]() |
That looks so cool, Indian3000! Here's a suggestion for a Spirit site: Sol 310 Navcam panorama for the rock structures:
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/spirit_n310.html and Sol 112-113 for the dramatic shadow: 3.3Mb: http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/pre...mPan-A113R1.jpg -------------------- |
|
|
![]()
Post
#175
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1619 Joined: 12-February 06 From: Bergerac - FR Member No.: 678 ![]() |
If you want, I've made a logo for your Mars Rovers Center Polar Transform (MRCPT) :
PNG image : ![]() Background image from Mhoward pan and polarized with MRCPT ![]() And an ICO file : MarsRoverCenter PolarTranform Icon I can try to make others icons for Mars3DCenter ![]() -------------------- |
|
|
![]()
Post
#176
|
||||
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 239 Joined: 20-April 05 From: Bruxelles, Belgium Member No.: 278 ![]() |
Ant103 : thanks, it's a good idee,it is in general the kind of small details of which I do not think…
![]() ![]() aldo12xu : here spirit sol 310 ![]() spheric projection ( browse version ) here a full version SPIRIT_SOL354_spheric_proj.jpg 10000x5000 ( +- 2,5 mb ) vertical projection 0.5cm / pixel vertical projection 1.0cm / pixel -------------------- |
|||
|
||||
![]()
Post
#177
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 320 Joined: 19-June 04 Member No.: 85 ![]() |
That looks great and it's a very useful image, too!! As long as we don't get too far from the centre of the projection, we can see a suggestion as to how the rocks are oriented. In this case, they seem to strike NNW and dip to the east, assuming north is at the top. I imagine the flatter the terrain, the less distortion there is as well.
-------------------- |
|
|
![]()
Post
#178
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 ![]() |
...we can see a suggestion as to how the rocks are orientated. This is just a personal gripe of mine, but... there really is no such word as "orientate." "Orientation" is a noun made from the verb "orient," to position. If you want to use a verb for the purpose, please use the correct one -- orient. The proper way to say the above is "we can see a suggestion as to how the rocks are oriented." As a writer, I just have to express this kind of thing every once in a while. If I keep it bottled up for too long, you'll end up hearing an enormous explosion centered on the suburbs of Minneapolis... ![]() -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#179
|
||
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 239 Joined: 20-April 05 From: Bruxelles, Belgium Member No.: 278 ![]() |
as promised
![]() Spirit sol 111 vertical projection 1 cm /pixel I do not put spheric projection, I have small a bug in my program, it is necessary that I correct ![]() -------------------- |
|
|
||
![]()
Post
#180
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 320 Joined: 19-June 04 Member No.: 85 ![]() |
Thanks Indian3000! Another nice one!
And Doug, nothing wrong with letting off a bit of literary steam ![]() -------------------- |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th June 2024 - 09:50 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
![]() |