IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

10 Pages V  « < 5 6 7 8 9 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
DART & HERA, NASA/ESA Asteroid Redirection Missions
Marcin600
post Sep 28 2022, 05:17 PM
Post #91


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 435
Joined: 14-December 15
Member No.: 7860



Here is a video compilation of 3 LICIACube pictures: https://twitter.com/i/status/1574784696311025664
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Sep 28 2022, 06:13 PM
Post #92


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2511
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



One wonders if the large overexposure of the LICIACube images was intentional or accidental.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcin600
post Sep 28 2022, 06:17 PM
Post #93


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 435
Joined: 14-December 15
Member No.: 7860



QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Sep 28 2022, 08:13 PM) *
One wonders if the large overexposure of the LICIACube images was intentional or accidental.

Rather intentional I think as the debris of the impact were expected to be faint (?)

EDIT:
According to David Avino, CEO of Argotec (in this article - https://www.repubblica.it/tecnologia/2022/0...cube-367588148/ ) LICIACube took 620 pictures that will be downloaded in the next few days.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
StargazeInWonder
post Sep 28 2022, 06:41 PM
Post #94


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 228
Joined: 14-January 22
Member No.: 9140



In a way, this continues the theme of Insight's failed drilling: While mechanics in space are incredibly predictable, mechanics in heterogeneous solid bodies are incredibly unpredictable.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cIclops
post Sep 30 2022, 01:20 PM
Post #95


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 133
Joined: 29-January 05
Member No.: 161



Hubble and Webb images ...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Quetzalcoatl
post Oct 2 2022, 02:17 PM
Post #96


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 103
Joined: 3-February 20
From: Paris (France)
Member No.: 8747



Hi,

A question arises. What is left of Dimorphos ?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
john_s
post Oct 2 2022, 06:28 PM
Post #97


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 699
Joined: 3-December 04
From: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Member No.: 117



Despite the spectacular amount of debris, I've heard rough estimates of the total volume of ejected material being equivalent to a crater ten or so meters across, so Dimorphos is probably alive and well. We'll know soon, when mutual events are detected (or not...).

John
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
scalbers
post Oct 2 2022, 06:32 PM
Post #98


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1628
Joined: 5-March 05
From: Boulder, CO
Member No.: 184



Yes this makes sense as my rule of thumb is a crater is around 20 times the diameter of the impactor.


--------------------
Steve [ my home page and planetary maps page ]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
StargazeInWonder
post Oct 2 2022, 08:47 PM
Post #99


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 228
Joined: 14-January 22
Member No.: 9140



The density and structure of Dimorphos makes it hard to compare with larger bodies with known impacts. This paper

https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/515/2/2178/6634251

estimates a density of 2.2. Chondrites have a density of about 3.5, which would make Dimorphos about one third empty space. Lunar regolith is even less dense than that, but for any significant craters, the surface soil is an insignificant fraction of the volume. In a nutshell, there's probably, in comparison to the Moon, etc., more room (literally and figuratively) for Dimorphos's regolith to compress rather than eject, which could make a crater smaller, while creating a mascon of significant size compared to the entire body of the asteroid.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcin600
post Oct 3 2022, 06:45 PM
Post #100


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 435
Joined: 14-December 15
Member No.: 7860



Something like "mini-panoramas" of the Dimorphos surface (unfortunately not very clear) - just for fun wink.gif
From this picture: https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/th...splay-final.png

Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Oct 4 2022, 06:38 AM
Post #101


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10151
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Nice mini-panoramas! But I noticed something in the image you linked to, and here I post it with some severe image brightening off the terminator... there is some detail to be seen in reflected light. The large boulder is reflecting light to its upper right in this view, clearly revealing a smaller boulder in shadow beneath it. There are other suggested details which might be picking up some light from Didymos - I think the geometry is correct for that. It will be interesting to see the raw data for these images, which might be more suitable for this kind of processing.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Oct 4 2022, 06:47 AM
Post #102


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10151
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Also... check out this wonderful family portrait by Roman Tkachenko:

https://twitter.com/_RomanTkachenko/status/...016827993288704

Phil




--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Oct 4 2022, 07:22 PM
Post #103


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10151
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



This is a better image of the night side of Dimorphos. There is lots to see. Too bad this won't work on Didymos, where there is no suitable light source.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcin600
post Oct 5 2022, 12:18 AM
Post #104


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 435
Joined: 14-December 15
Member No.: 7860



QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Oct 4 2022, 09:22 PM) *
This is a better image of the night side of Dimorphos...

Amazing work! So many new details from so few stray photons!
Dimorphos looks more elongated than I thought.
And this illuminated boulder is really huge - I estimate over 40 m long (the largest on this side of the moon).

[As for Roman's processing of pictures, I MUST say he has great talent]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post Oct 5 2022, 01:56 AM
Post #105


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1582
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



I vaguely recall hearing that another presscon was coming, with more LiciaCube images, with more scientific interpretation/results. Was I imagining that? Because I can't find anything to confirm that on the internets.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

10 Pages V  « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 03:11 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.