IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Mer Sfx Images, A Long Time Ago ...
SigurRosFan
post Feb 20 2006, 06:05 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 531
Joined: 24-August 05
Member No.: 471



First, there's a landing site overview (full version 152 KB).

Spirit on Sol 6:


--------------------
- blue_scape / Nico -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Feb 20 2006, 08:44 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Beautiful, bluescape.
Results could be even better in terms of lighting/shadows, but realism is already good.


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Astro0
post Feb 20 2006, 10:45 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3108
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



Shadowing is really important for these sort of images.
It 'attaches' the Rover to the ground/environment.
Little details help as well... for instance, the IDD shouldn't be extended at this stage.
For realism, it could be deleted from the original image or redrawn in stow position.

For some of the SFX images that I've played with I've had to rely on various images of the Rover taken from a variety of sources. What we really need to do all this properly is a high quality 3-D mesh (wireframe) of the MERs with realistic colours and textures available.

If anyone knows of such that can be downloaded for FREE, then let me know.
There are a few meshes available for purchase online, but I'm not solvent enough to spare a few hundred dollars on them.

It would be really nice to produce a coffee table book or online gallery for all of these SFX images.
I think Aldo12xu has suggested an online repository...how about it?

Can I suggest too that if UMSF'ers want to post these SFX images (and I'm all for it) that from now on we post only thumbnails (following jamescanvin's lead) and host the images elsewhere and that way we don't take up too much of Doug's server/bandwidth.

Just a few thoughts.
Astro0
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Astro0
post Feb 21 2006, 12:44 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3108
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



Thought I better put my money where my mouth is and produce a version of this image.

Full size image on my blog
I hope that there are some other MER SFX'ers out there who would like to contribute.
SigurRosFan and I are having fun and, at least from my point of view, it fills the void while we wait for Exploratorium to catch up. wink.gif

Enjoy
Astro0
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Feb 21 2006, 01:07 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



QUOTE (Astro0 @ Feb 21 2006, 01:44 PM) *
SigurRosFan and I are having fun


Me too!

OT: This image of Spirit reminds me of the MER Team concerns with "getting down from the lander on this or that size" due to the airbags. Now, with all those 750 sols on the back, compare this manouver with the almost "rock climb" she did to go to the top of HP.

What a difference.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
aldo12xu
post Feb 21 2006, 03:31 PM
Post #6


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 320
Joined: 19-June 04
Member No.: 85



Awesome work, Astro & Nico! Including the rover really brings the photos to life. And, yeah, I have tons of bandwidth (which I thought I'd need for all my videos) so I'd be more than happy to host a Special FX page, with proper credit given to each artist, of course smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Oersted_*
post Feb 22 2006, 12:08 AM
Post #7





Guests






QUOTE (Astro0 @ Feb 21 2006, 01:44 PM) *
Thought I better put my money where my mouth is and produce a version of this image.

Full size image on my website

I hope that there are some other MER SFX'ers out there who would like to contribute.
SigurRosFan and I are having fun and, at least from my point of view, it fills the void while we wait for Exploratorium to catch up. wink.gif

Enjoy
Astro0


Ok, a few small points of criticism. I think you should have made the shadows darker and sharper. Just behind the rear wheel of the rover you see a shadow on the lander. I know the distance is a bit longer from the rover top deck to the lander, but I'd expect basically a shadow that sharp and that dark. Another thing: I think the solar panels are far too blue, compared to the sky above them. I think you should reflect the sky colour more on the solar arrays.

Great work, hope you don't mind my constructive criticism!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Astro0
post Feb 22 2006, 02:27 AM
Post #8


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3108
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



QUOTE (Oersted @ Feb 22 2006, 11:08 AM) *
Ok, a few small points of criticism. I think you should have made the shadows darker and sharper. Just behind the rear wheel of the rover you see a shadow on the lander. I know the distance is a bit longer from the rover top deck to the lander, but I'd expect basically a shadow that sharp and that dark. Another thing: I think the solar panels are far too blue, compared to the sky above them. I think you should reflect the sky colour more on the solar arrays.

Great work, hope you don't mind my constructive criticism!


Love the criticism! smile.gif
These things can always be done better. The shadows are the hardest to get right.
I think I was basically reflecting the look of the shadows you can see on the surface from the egress ramps.
I debated the look for a while in Photoshop and that's what came out.

I got a tip on another thread about a 3DS model of the Rover that I think I can adapt and use in some nifty software that I've puchased and that way I will be able to incorporate the MERs into scenes with much better shadowing, etc.

Thanks for the ideas.
Astro0
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SigurRosFan
post Feb 22 2006, 05:05 PM
Post #9


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 531
Joined: 24-August 05
Member No.: 471



I know these details, but ... somewhen. Now, I would try to cover the tracks.

Small critical: Your rover is slightly to small. Spirit's size in my SFX image is more accurate.

Btw: Special thanks to Tman!


--------------------
- blue_scape / Nico -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Astro0
post Feb 23 2006, 12:49 AM
Post #10


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3108
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



QUOTE (SigurRosFan @ Feb 23 2006, 04:05 AM) *
I know these details, but ... somewhen. Now, I would try to cover the tracks.
Small critical: Your rover is slightly to small. Spirit's size in my SFX image is more accurate.
Btw: Special thanks to Tman!


Actually, looking back at images of the Rover while still in the lab and later images before rolling off the lander, I think the truth lays somewhere in between our two images. Also, the model we are using has too much perspective for this image and means that the position of the wheels is out of alignment.

Looking at the full-scale replica of the Rover from JPL that we have at our Deep Space Complex, I think there are a few scale issues with the 3D model as well, eg: camera mast a little too thin, camera head not high enough, and front wheel supports a bit short - only small variations, but enough to make producing an accurate image difficult.

I'm going to have another go at this particular shot and make a few improvements as suggested by others above. Now that I have the 3D mesh model and some other image references on file I think I can look forward to producing even better composite images.

I think however that the bottom line on all this discussion is very simple...
"We are having fun as artists and enjoying the journey of these two incredible vehicles and their proud 'parents' back here on Earth." biggrin.gif

Astro0
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Feb 23 2006, 01:14 AM
Post #11


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2918
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (Astro0 @ Feb 23 2006, 01:49 AM) *
Actually, looking back at images of the Rover while still in the lab and later images before rolling off the lander, I think the truth lays somewhere in between our two images. Also, the model we are using has too much perspective for this image and means that the position of the wheels is out of alignment.

Looking at the full-scale replica of the Rover from JPL that we have at our Deep Space Complex, I think there are a few scale issues with the 3D model as well, eg: camera mast a little too thin, camera head not high enough, and front wheel supports a bit short - only small variations, but enough to make producing an accurate image difficult.

I'm going to have another go at this particular shot and make a few improvements as suggested by others above. Now that I have the 3D mesh model and some other image references on file I think I can look forward to producing even better composite images.

I think however that the bottom line on all this discussion is very simple...
"We are having fun as artists and enjoying the journey of these two incredible vehicles and their proud 'parents' back here on Earth." biggrin.gif

Astro0

Yeah, very nice job but perfectible : as compared to the lander, she still looks like she comes .... from another planet wink.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SigurRosFan
post Feb 23 2006, 05:17 PM
Post #12


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 531
Joined: 24-August 05
Member No.: 471



Yeah, without tracks ... cool.gif

Opportunity on Sol 17 (144 KB):


--------------------
- blue_scape / Nico -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Feb 23 2006, 06:22 PM
Post #13


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Needs shadows - but they're cool smile.gif

If you do a drop shadow in photoshop, then make a layer from it, you can then warp / perspective / distort to make the shadow appear to cast in the right direction as based on other shadows in the scene smile.gif

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Feb 23 2006, 07:38 PM
Post #14


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2918
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (djellison @ Feb 23 2006, 07:22 PM) *
Needs shadows - but they're cool smile.gif

If you do a drop shadow in photoshop, then make a layer from it, you can then warp / perspective / distort to make the shadow appear to cast in the right direction as based on other shadows in the scene smile.gif

Doug

I'm still struggling to create decent picture myself. I was wondering if anybody has thought to create pictures were NIGHT will ne simulated by reducing light in the scenary, the rover, the sky, and putting REAL night sky (we could use pictures of Earth's night sky) and we could even show the Earth in the sky. Will be cool eh?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Feb 23 2006, 07:38 PM
Post #15


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



QUOTE
Looking at the full-scale replica of the Rover from JPL ...


I'm building a 1/4 scale Rover and the more I look closely at photos of it, the more fine details keep popping out at me. And the more familiar I become with the Rovers the more discrepancies I see in the 3-D models. This is not to be critical, this is FWIW. You can't take a 3-D object, make a 2-D representation of it and make that 2-D look 3-D.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th April 2024 - 11:04 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.