IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

12 Pages V  « < 10 11 12  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
The Top of Vera Rubin Ridge, Site 66-, sol 1812-, 11 Sep 2017-
erwan
post Nov 21 2017, 12:53 AM
Post #166


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 162
Joined: 31-January 05
From: Brittany (France)
Member No.: 164



QUOTE (neo56 @ Nov 20 2017, 08:56 AM) *
Mosaic of two debayered MC100 photos, showing nice details on the distant hills.


Superbe image merci !


--------------------

Erwann
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Nov 21 2017, 08:57 AM
Post #167


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1286
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



Some rather nice L&R Mastcam images acquired just before sunset on Sol 1880 The mission update refers to these as to get a better idea of the aerosols - dust and water ice
Sadly they are Bayer encoded and jpeg'ed, so beyond the range of my rather basic skill-set. Hopefully someone can do them the justice they deserve and possible acquire another fine animated Martian sunset.
Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Yesterday, 12:58 AM
Post #168


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1286
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



A small set of pre-dawn RMI's looking for Frost on sol 1883

One unusual image in the set of four! Maybe some sort of over exposed or a calibration image? I have not encountered one like this before... Any ideas? smile.gif
Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Yesterday, 01:36 AM
Post #169


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3792
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Underexposed, by the look of it.

Here's a quick-and-dirty stab at deBayering that sunset pic:
Attached Image

I've done some heavy Gaussian blurring of the hue and saturation channels.

We can't trust the colours here, due to the heavy colour banding/quantization due to the jpegging of the Bayer. In particular I don't buy the grey outer sky regions. But, as always, it's worth it since the raw pds images will be stunning...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vikingmars
post Yesterday, 09:32 AM
Post #170


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 820
Joined: 19-February 05
From: Close to Meudon Observatory in France
Member No.: 172



QUOTE (fredk @ Nov 23 2017, 02:36 AM) *
Underexposed, by the look of it.
Here's a quick-and-dirty stab at deBayering that sunset pic:
We can't trust the colours here, due to the heavy colour banding/quantization due to the jpegging of the Bayer. In particular I don't buy the grey outer sky regions. But, as always, it's worth it since the raw pds images will be stunning...


Dear Fredk, thanks a lot for saving us time for this debayering.
Here are the approximate (real) colors I found on your nice image, after using my database and a quick processing.
Enjoy smile.gif
Attached Image

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

12 Pages V  « < 10 11 12
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th November 2017 - 04:56 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.