Why Not Send Another Mer Pair? |
Why Not Send Another Mer Pair? |
Jan 20 2005, 07:28 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 8-June 04 Member No.: 80 |
I realize MSL has more neat features and will last longer, but the design on MER has been proven to work since Spirit has lasted over a year and Opportunity is close behind. MER is cheaper than MSL because it will use solar power and won't take as much testing since it is using proven technologies. What I'm wondering is why not re-use a design that works?
|
|
|
Jan 23 2005, 11:25 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 76 Joined: 26-May 04 Member No.: 77 |
QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Jan 23 2005, 05:26 PM) A warning: you guys are jumping to very premature conclusions about what the Committee decided (although you may find what they DID decide a consolation prize). That's all I'm saying for now. I remember a recent article that said they were considering doubling up on the MSL rovers. I really hope this is done, considering the brand new EDL sequence. However, I truely hope the committee has not decided to completely abandon the MER design. Bruce, when will we know the "inside scoop" on this? |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 30th March 2024 - 03:01 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |