IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

14 Pages V  « < 12 13 14  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Earth Return & Sample Science
stevesliva
post Feb 16 2024, 10:36 PM
Post #196


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1582
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



The media is great. A few huge photos and a video. Looks like meticulous work

The mass is low-ish to these expectations, but I'd still say this estimate of "at least 2x 60g" was enough to say "stow it."
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2109/2109.05561.pdf

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Feb 17 2024, 12:48 AM
Post #197


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2516
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (stevesliva @ Feb 16 2024, 02:36 PM) *
The mass is low-ish to these expectations...

Paper says 250.37 +/- 101 g and 121.6 g is outside this range, but not by a huge amount (about 19% lower.)


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Mar 7 2024, 10:04 PM
Post #198


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10160
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



https://lpsc2024.ipostersessions.com/defaul...-B2-03-BA-F5-5B

This link is to my LPSC poster. But can you see it without a request to log in? Let me know.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Mar 7 2024, 10:40 PM
Post #199


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



It pops up, no problem.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Mar 8 2024, 08:17 AM
Post #200


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10160
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Thanks. I can't tell how it looks to others. I know I can see it!

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Mar 8 2024, 03:42 PM
Post #201


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Nicely done, Phil! I take it the title and heading font is from the template because I couldn't find a way to edit the formatting of those.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Mar 8 2024, 07:51 PM
Post #202


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10160
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Right. I didn't change anything in the template.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcin600
post Apr 1 2024, 10:28 PM
Post #203


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 436
Joined: 14-December 15
Member No.: 7860



"The curation team at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston has released the OSIRIS-REx sample catalog detailing the small rocks and dust that scientists around the globe can request for their research."
https://blogs.nasa.gov/osiris-rex/
https://curator.jsc.nasa.gov/osirisrex/index.cfm# - catalog
https://curator.jsc.nasa.gov/osirisrex/aiva...ges_listing.cfm - some pictures
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcin600
post Apr 1 2024, 10:34 PM
Post #204


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 436
Joined: 14-December 15
Member No.: 7860



It looks like the largest piece in the photographed sample - 3.5 cm long in my opinion.
And other interesting particles.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image

Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image

Attached Image

 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcin600
post Apr 1 2024, 10:40 PM
Post #205


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 436
Joined: 14-December 15
Member No.: 7860



And another frame of the sample, which looks almost like a close-up view of the surface of Bennu - obviously not on the same scale, but considering the fractal structure of the asteroid, the view is quite similar...
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rhr
post May 9 2024, 03:00 PM
Post #206


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 11
Joined: 30-May 08
Member No.: 4166



There's a publication up:
Asteroid (101955) Bennu in the Laboratory: Properties of the Sample Collected by OSIRIS-REx

https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.12536
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcin600
post May 9 2024, 05:26 PM
Post #207


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 436
Joined: 14-December 15
Member No.: 7860



QUOTE (rhr @ May 9 2024, 05:00 PM) *
There's a publication up:
Asteroid (101955) Bennu in the Laboratory: Properties of the Sample Collected by OSIRIS-REx

https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.12536


Thanks for this information.
A very interesting publication - studies like this one are, in fact, the most valuable fruit generated by automatic interplanetary missions.

For convenience, I am only adding a direct link to the PDF of the entire publication (including images): https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.12536
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rlorenz
post Yesterday, 10:38 PM
Post #208


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 611
Joined: 23-February 07
From: Occasionally in Columbia, MD
Member No.: 1764



QUOTE (rhr @ May 9 2024, 10:00 AM) *
There's a publication up:


There's a nice reference in that scientific preprint to a reconstruction analysis of the EDL at NTRS

Things weren't quite as complicated as I speculated back in (post 116), as there had been a press statement about altitude that was spurious*. No need now, I think, to invoke the dynamic pressure I wondered about.

The lines to the main deploy/drogue release pyro and the drogue deploy mortar were switched.

The first firing was 14 seconds after a g-trigger (downgoing 3g), the second firing was to be 363 seconds after that trigger, or when a pressure sensor saw 10,000ft above sea level, whichever condition was met first.

The first firing effectively caused nothing to happen, since both drogue and main were still buttoned up in the capsule, except the line from drogue to capsule was severed.

The capsule was then falling faster than planned (no drogue!) and tumbling, until the pressure trigger fired (only 212 seconds after the g-trigger). Mortar fired throwing out the drogue which pulled out the main as it was dragged away. Although the main deployed at a higher dynamic pressure than intended (and at a who-knows-what attitude), it fortunately did so safely.

Kudos to the team for writing up these details so they can be learned from.

Ralph

(*Francis Crick : "Any theory that fits all the facts will be wrong, because some of the facts will be wrong")
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

14 Pages V  « < 12 13 14
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12th May 2024 - 06:41 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.