IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Juno Perijove 33, April 16, 2021
Kevin Gill
post Apr 19 2021, 10:41 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 137
Joined: 22-July 14
Member No.: 7220



The first batch of PJ33 images are down!

Tried running them through my pipeline but it blew up during the ISIS3 cam2map step with the error "**PROGRAMMER ERROR** Angle cannot be a non-Null special pixel." First time I've seen that...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Apr 19 2021, 11:19 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2504
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



Just to warn everybody -- owing to various DSN factors, it may be a while before the rest of PJ33 shows up.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brian Swift
post Apr 20 2021, 04:40 PM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 403
Joined: 18-September 17
Member No.: 8250



While we're waiting... Here's my processing of what has been downlinked

Attached Image

Full resolution version available at https://www.missionjuno.swri.edu/junocam/processing?id=10362
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kevin Gill
post Apr 20 2021, 05:06 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 137
Joined: 22-July 14
Member No.: 7220



QUOTE (Brian Swift @ Apr 20 2021, 11:40 AM) *
While we're waiting... Here's my processing of what has been downlinked

Attached Image

Full resolution version available at https://www.missionjuno.swri.edu/junocam/processing?id=10362



Beautiful! I want to get at that storm in PJ33-27 & 28 sooo bad! Did you have any spice errors or other issues with this perijove, or is it just me?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brian Swift
post Apr 20 2021, 06:08 PM
Post #5


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 403
Joined: 18-September 17
Member No.: 8250



QUOTE (Kevin Gill @ Apr 20 2021, 09:06 AM) *
Beautiful! I want to get at that storm in PJ33-27 & 28 sooo bad! Did you have any spice errors or other issues with this perijove, or is it just me?

I didn't notice any spice problems on my side. The special pixel is just wants to torment you.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Apr 21 2021, 06:24 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (Brian Swift @ Apr 20 2021, 05:40 PM) *
While we're waiting... Here's my processing of what has been downlinked

Thanks a lot, Brian - these mosaics make great summaries of the encounters.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kevin Gill
post Apr 22 2021, 06:22 PM
Post #7


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 137
Joined: 22-July 14
Member No.: 7220



QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Apr 19 2021, 06:19 PM) *
Just to warn everybody -- owing to various DSN factors, it may be a while before the rest of PJ33 shows up.



Mike, I was wondering if you could check the image times and spacecraft clock values reported in the image metadata. My processing doesn't work (camera can't find Jupiter) if I use the values as reported, but if I shift them to ~10 hours earlier, it's closer. I'm not sure of the exact time difference or if the error is in the metadata JSON or in the spice kernels.

Thanks!


Turns out to be an issue with the spice kernels that are off by the ~10 hours. Imagery times appear to be correct.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Apr 22 2021, 08:43 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2504
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (Kevin Gill @ Apr 22 2021, 10:22 AM) *
Mike, I was wondering if you could check the image times and spacecraft clock values reported in the image metadata.

Image 16 is SCLK 671800194:54 or 2021 APR 15 23:03:54.55 and the JSON on missionjuno says "IMAGE_TIME": "2021-04-15T23:03:54.546" so that all seems right to me.

We used juno_sc_rec_210414_210416_v01.bc and spk_ref_210111_251021_210111.bsp to do our processing, I believe, and it certainly found Jupiter OK.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Apr 23 2021, 01:11 AM
Post #9


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2504
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (Kevin Gill @ Apr 22 2021, 10:22 AM) *
Turns out to be an issue with the spice kernels that are off by the ~10 hours.

Be aware that some of the files on the NAIF website produced before the EM was official will have the old pre-EM orbit, which I expect was the source of your problems. But I'm not sure which are good and which are bad or how this interacts with the ISIS kernel updating process, if that's what you're using.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bjorn Jonsson
post Apr 23 2021, 03:13 AM
Post #10


IMG to PNG GOD
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2250
Joined: 19-February 04
From: Near fire and ice
Member No.: 38



To prepare for the extended mission and maintain the orbit, PJ33 was delayed by exactly one jovian day compared to earlier plans. See https://britastro.org/node/25896
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brian Swift
post Apr 23 2021, 05:21 AM
Post #11


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 403
Joined: 18-September 17
Member No.: 8250



QUOTE (fredk @ Apr 21 2021, 11:24 AM) *
Thanks a lot, Brian - these mosaics make great summaries of the encounters.

Thanks Fred. And the large versions on Mission Juno allow you to explore the full resolution of all the color images in a perijove.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Apr 23 2021, 06:04 AM
Post #12


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3226
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



I don't do a lot of JunoCAM processing, but for Juno visualizations, I maintain a metakernel that I try to update about once a week. I use the following kernels for the spacecraft position:

spk_ref_210111_251021_210111.bsp
juno_pred_orbit.bsp
juno_rec_orbit.bsp

The first is the reference orbit for the extended mission while the other two are regularly updated files covering the predicted orbit through July 20 (at present) and the recorded orbit (through March 21). The latter two files are regularly updated and I just keep those files up-to-date.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Apr 23 2021, 06:27 AM
Post #13


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2504
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (volcanopele @ Apr 22 2021, 10:04 PM) *
spk_ref_210111_251021_210111.bsp... is the reference orbit for the extended mission...

One problem is that this file (which we also use, see above) isn't on the NAIF web site at present, we've asked that it be put back up. The older ref files are, I think, wrong (as one would expect.)

Using the rec or later pre files should be safe, I hope.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Apr 23 2021, 08:54 PM
Post #14


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2504
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



I think all of the PJ33 images are on missionjuno now.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Apr 23 2021, 11:35 PM
Post #15


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3226
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Thanks for the heads up!

Here's the Io image from 33C00045:

Attached Image


No plumes apparent, though Chalybes would be on the bright limb at upper left. Chalybes had been cooling down in late 2019/early 2020 so it may not have an active plume at present. No known plume sources on the terminator, so the lack of a plume is not entirely surprising...

I will leave it to others to tease out and process the grouping of three Galilean moons in that image. Europa is the smaller half-moon to the left of Io and Callisto is even smaller, and darker, between the two and maybe a half a framelet down.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th March 2024 - 05:26 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.