Journey to Mt Sharp - Part 3A: In-situ science at the Kimberley, Sol 596 [Apr 10,'14] to 633 [May 18, '14] |
Journey to Mt Sharp - Part 3A: In-situ science at the Kimberley, Sol 596 [Apr 10,'14] to 633 [May 18, '14] |
Apr 22 2014, 02:26 AM
Post
#61
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2428 Joined: 30-January 13 From: Penang, Malaysia. Member No.: 6853 |
I'm wondering if this is the spot where they will "do some science" (modulo a small bump here or there) or continue reconnoitering. Still 'reconnoitering' acording to Ken's latest report LINK QUOTE .....Another drive toward potential drill targets was planned for Sol 606, followed by untargeted remote sensing on Sol 607.
|
|
|
Apr 22 2014, 03:38 AM
Post
#62
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 201 Joined: 16-December 13 Member No.: 7067 |
Excited to have a Haz sequence to play with - I'm hoping to do a little stabilization tomorrow morning
But here is the AutoNav on 606 Part 1 I split off Part 2 because it looks cooler and loop-reversed it for continuity |
|
|
Apr 22 2014, 10:16 AM
Post
#63
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2819 Joined: 22-April 05 From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands Member No.: 353 |
|
|
|
Apr 22 2014, 10:23 AM
Post
#64
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1619 Joined: 12-February 06 From: Bergerac - FR Member No.: 678 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Apr 22 2014, 11:35 AM
Post
#65
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 282 Joined: 18-June 04 Member No.: 84 |
|
|
|
Apr 22 2014, 03:10 PM
Post
#66
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 201 Joined: 16-December 13 Member No.: 7067 |
I felt there was too much bouncing around in the Haz sequence to just post the 5 frame gif
Here is the rear view, with Mt Joseph sinking into the terrain And the front view. Not as nice, but it gives an idea of whats to our left, now. And a quick question: I'm noticing quality degradation with the GIMP rotation tool - is that just unavoidable? |
|
|
Apr 22 2014, 04:49 PM
Post
#67
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 4246 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
is that just unavoidable? To some degree, yes. Whenever you rotate an image you must interpolate pixel values from the original grid onto the new one. That tends to give a somewhat blurred-looking rotated image. There are many ways of interpolating - some may work better for certain types of images. So if you can, try different interpolation algorithms. |
|
|
Apr 22 2014, 05:08 PM
Post
#68
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 809 Joined: 3-June 04 From: Brittany, France Member No.: 79 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Apr 22 2014, 05:18 PM
Post
#69
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10151 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Loss of clarity during rotation: enlarge the image by a factor of 2, rotate, resample back to the original pixel size. That will lose less detail for you.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Apr 22 2014, 05:55 PM
Post
#70
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 809 Joined: 3-June 04 From: Brittany, France Member No.: 79 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Apr 22 2014, 06:50 PM
Post
#71
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 201 Joined: 16-December 13 Member No.: 7067 |
Thanks for the advice! I just found the different interpolation settings, so I'll have to read up on them.
Apologies for the successive posts, so here is a nice sunset from 586, full res linked Also, the earlier MAHLI images of the mast are down!! Something about seeing wire-ties on Mars makes me smile. Lastly, just wanted to say thanks again for all the panoramas in this area - Curiosity's taken a look from so many different locations around the Kimberly |
|
|
Apr 22 2014, 09:02 PM
Post
#72
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 866 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Santa Cruz, CA Member No.: 196 |
wonder why the MAHLIs pairs are essentially retakes 15 seconds apart rather than focus stack or attempts at stereo pairs?
something about trying to make out spec numbers under all that dusty coating makes me smile too.. |
|
|
Apr 22 2014, 09:30 PM
Post
#73
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14432 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
They're not retakes - look at the motor count - they're slightly different focus points.
|
|
|
Apr 22 2014, 11:11 PM
Post
#74
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 866 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Santa Cruz, CA Member No.: 196 |
|
|
|
Apr 23 2014, 09:02 AM
Post
#75
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 809 Joined: 3-June 04 From: Brittany, France Member No.: 79 |
Panorama taken on sols 603 & 604 with MC34:
And the corresponding zoom with MC100 on the rocks of Mount Remarkable: -------------------- |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th April 2024 - 10:02 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |