IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

24 Pages V  « < 20 21 22 23 24 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
The Return to Home Plate
Stephen
post Jun 14 2007, 02:37 AM
Post #316


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 307
Joined: 16-March 05
Member No.: 198



QUOTE (dvandorn @ Jun 13 2007, 11:53 PM) *
I've heard people try to use "areology" for the study of Martian landforms, "selenology" for the study of lunar landforms, etc. Frankly, I'd rather just use the term "geology" for all of them, and I'm glad there is an acceptance of the term as it applies to the study of non-terrestrial landforms.

Hmm. Does that mean we should not be referring to people like Steve Squyres as "planetologists" but go back to referring to them as "geologists"? rolleyes.gif

======
Stephen
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jun 14 2007, 04:28 AM
Post #317


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Well..."planetary scientist" is a suitably broad term, though perhaps not useful for describing a specialty or focus. I think that, for example, "planetary geologist", "planetary geochemist", etc., etc. would more than suffice.

Main thrust here is to at least state that the person's focus is extraterrestrial, with an implicit acknowledgement that observations must inevitably echo the fact that the scientist in question is probably going to compare and contrast them to his or her own direct terrestrial experiences, odd as Earth may be in many ways...


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Jun 14 2007, 05:09 AM
Post #318


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



Various terminologies are useful at different times, but you can really get get caught up in semantics if you try to be too specific. I would think that most scientists think outside of their specific specialties when they need to. I'm sure it is dangerous, but I sometimes wonder about the geology of neutron stars. Does that make me a stellar geologist? You might find some who would object. wink.gif


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stephen
post Jun 15 2007, 04:22 AM
Post #319


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 307
Joined: 16-March 05
Member No.: 198



QUOTE (nprev @ Jun 14 2007, 02:28 PM) *
Well..."planetary scientist" is a suitably broad term, though perhaps not useful for describing a specialty or focus. I think that, for example, "planetary geologist", "planetary geochemist", etc., etc. would more than suffice.

I'm sure that's all very logical, but think about it: is someone whose speciality is the study of the rocks of Mars to be dubbed a "martian geologist"? That would surely evoke visions in many lay people of little green men with rockhammers! biggrin.gif

QUOTE (nprev @ Jun 14 2007, 02:28 PM) *
Main thrust here is to at least state that the person's focus is extraterrestrial, with an implicit acknowledgement that observations must inevitably echo the fact that the scientist in question is probably going to compare and contrast them to his or her own direct terrestrial experiences, odd as Earth may be in many ways...

I suppose it all depends on what these terms are supposed to signify. Does "geology" signify the study of rocks (& stratas & soils etc) in general or of Earth rocks et al only (or at least of them in particular)? If the latter then to use "areology" to signify the study of the rocks of Mars (as distinct from those of such places as Earth or the Moon) does have a certain consistency and logic to it. But in that case some other term ("planetology", maybe?) would need to step in for the study of rocks in general regardless of planetary location.

Conversely, if "geology" means the study of rocks et al in general then sooner or later there will come a need to coin terms for the fields of study of those who specialise in the rocks of particular planets, be it Mars, the Moon, or Io, just as there has come to be a need to distinguish the field of "geology" from the fields of "geochemistry", "geophysics" etc. It no longer suffices to simply call them all geologists. smile.gif

======
Stephen
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Jun 15 2007, 01:32 PM
Post #320


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (Stephen @ Jun 15 2007, 12:22 AM) *
...if "geology" means the study of rocks et al in general then sooner or later there will come a need to coin terms
for the fields of study of those who specialise in the rocks of particular planets, be it Mars, the Moon, or Io...

This would be an unnecessary and confusing complication. A 'geochemist' can apply his expertise
to Io just as well as to Mars. Can you imagine the problems caused when an 'Iologist' tries to present
a paper on Mars surface chemistry. Will his research be taken as seriously as that of an 'areologist'?

Edit: On rethinking (while in the dentist's chair) your explosion of officially named specialties
may well be the norm about a hundred years from now. It will be that long before there
enough material for study in each specialized area. For the time being I prefer something
like: "Venus geologist" (as opposed to a Venusian geologist)or "Geologist specializing in
lunar mountain formation"

This post has been edited by centsworth_II: Jun 15 2007, 04:03 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Jun 16 2007, 04:56 PM
Post #321


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2817
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



Here is the panoramic view taken on Sol 1223

with the R0 Navcam.

jvandriel
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Edward Schmitz_*
post Jun 18 2007, 09:49 PM
Post #322





Guests






According to Webster, there is dual meaning in the term geology. The term is useful to describe a person studing rocks on another planet.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gray
post Jun 19 2007, 03:42 AM
Post #323


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 242
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Ohio, USA
Member No.: 34



QUOTE (Stephen @ Jun 15 2007, 04:22 AM) *
I'm sure that's all very logical, but think about it: is someone whose speciality is the study of the rocks of Mars to be dubbed a "martian geologist"? That would surely evoke visions in many lay people of little green men with rockhammers! biggrin.gif



Sometimes English isn't very precise. I'm a paleontologist who studies invertebrate fossils. Those of us in this field often refer to ourselves as "invertebrate paleontologists" yet we do have a backbone! laugh.gif

(No spineless jokes, please. tongue.gif )
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SteveM
post Jun 20 2007, 12:26 AM
Post #324


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 267
Joined: 5-February 06
Member No.: 675



QUOTE (Edward Schmitz @ Jun 18 2007, 04:49 PM) *
According to Webster, there is dual meaning in the term geology. The term is useful to describe a person studing rocks on another planet.

Since this thread doesn't seem like it's dying, let me give it a bit more sustenance. In Liddell and Scott's Greek-English Lexicon, the root for geology, Γή, has several meanings:
1. Earth, opposed to heaven, or land, opposed to sea.
2. Earth, as an element, opposed to air, water, fire.
II. A land or country.
III. The earth or ground as tilled.
IV. A lump of earth.
Looking from a strict etymological point of view, it seems that most of these meanings of the Greek root, and particularly the last two, free us from any planetary restrictions on geology.

Steve
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Jun 20 2007, 05:21 AM
Post #325


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



Agreed, unless you want to try to define an Internet geologist. cool.gif


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Jun 23 2007, 06:22 PM
Post #326


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2817
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



Here is the panoramic view taken on Sol 1223 and Sol 1227

with the Lo Navcam.

jvandriel
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Jun 24 2007, 05:58 AM
Post #327


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



Uh-oh, Spirit either tipped over or broke a couple of rocks with her stuck wheel.
She have to go back to get a closer look at them now.

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jun 24 2007, 02:03 PM
Post #328


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10146
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Here is jvandriel's latest pan in polar format:

Attached Image


Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Jun 25 2007, 06:51 AM
Post #329


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



QUOTE (alan @ Jun 24 2007, 07:58 AM) *
Uh-oh, Spirit either tipped over or broke a couple of rocks with her stuck wheel.
She have to go back to get a closer look at them now.


Your "wish" was granted Alan.
Spirit is back again at Nancy Warren. huh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Aug 29 2007, 07:34 AM
Post #330


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Let me "ressurrect" this old thread once again, hopefully for the last time!
Yestersol (sol 1298), Spirit left the area under study since sol 1221 (!) and is currently on the way back, again, to Home Plate.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

24 Pages V  « < 20 21 22 23 24 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 05:26 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.