IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

19 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
To the Cape!, Quackmire and arm troubles
climber
post Apr 10 2008, 09:59 PM
Post #61


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



Nice to see her again from the sky. Is this the first pictures from Oppy inside Vicky ?

Something different. I cannot remember whether somebody already pointed out this possibility :
Would be nice to send Oppy there on the way to Cape Verde :
Edit : you'd better click on the image to see what I want to show :

Attached Image




--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Apr 10 2008, 10:05 PM
Post #62


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



That's really quite moving, seeing Oppy again from above. Brings home just how small she is, but how fearless too...! smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SpaceListener
post Apr 10 2008, 10:10 PM
Post #63


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 279
Joined: 19-August 07
Member No.: 3299



If there is much sleepage, Oppy must move back until the platform and go to closer to Cape Verde and then go down. Not yet I have studied about the degree of transversability of the surface closer to the Cape verde.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Apr 11 2008, 07:39 AM
Post #64


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



> If there is much sleepage, Oppy must move back until the platform ...

AFAIK that's what they are trying to do, without too much success.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ant103
post Apr 11 2008, 01:24 PM
Post #65


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1619
Joined: 12-February 06
From: Bergerac - FR
Member No.: 678



Hi,

Still a long time without make pictures. So, after the beautiful pan of James, I want to show mine wink.gif


And a little desktop from it, with a new 16:9 format :


Bye,

Damien.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aussie
post Apr 12 2008, 08:37 AM
Post #66


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 144
Joined: 17-July 07
From: Canberra Australia
Member No.: 2865



Hey Ant, Love your desktops and have had Cape St Mary as my backdrop for a long time. But why such a low resolution for your latest effort? huh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mike
post Apr 12 2008, 09:23 AM
Post #67


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 350
Joined: 20-June 04
From: Portland, Oregon, U.S.A.
Member No.: 86



Thanks for the desktop image.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BrianL
post Apr 12 2008, 02:54 PM
Post #68


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 530
Joined: 21-March 06
From: Canada
Member No.: 721



New pics up on exploratorium. Much close scrutiny of the surface by the pancam. Guess I'll await the panel's analysis now.

Brian
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ant103
post Apr 12 2008, 04:43 PM
Post #69


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1619
Joined: 12-February 06
From: Bergerac - FR
Member No.: 678



QUOTE (Aussie @ Apr 12 2008, 10:37 AM) *
Hey Ant, Love your desktops and have had Cape St Mary as my backdrop for a long time. But why such a low resolution for your latest effort? huh.gif


Because I was thinking that a lot of people have more 16/9 size screen than traditionnal 4/3. But, If you want, I can make a version with previous resolution I used wink.gif.

Edit : for those like Aussi who prefer 1280 x 1024 px, here is a version of it : http://www.astrosurf.com/merimages/Desktop...esktop-1280.png


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Apr 12 2008, 07:07 PM
Post #70





Guests






It looks like they may be stuck ohmy.gif sad.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aussie
post Apr 13 2008, 03:19 AM
Post #71


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 144
Joined: 17-July 07
From: Canberra Australia
Member No.: 2865



Hi Ant,
The 16/9 sizing was great. It was just that a 6kb JPEG doesn't
provide much definition compared to (for example) the 1.7 Meg PNG in your latest 4/3.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Apr 13 2008, 10:06 AM
Post #72


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Another attempt to free the rover from the trap (I'm wondering on a name for it...) was executed on sol 1499.
The wheels were commanded to drive for about one meter but Opportunity had a net move of less then 10cm, making for more than 90% slippage.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Apr 13 2008, 04:47 PM
Post #73


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (Tesheiner @ Apr 13 2008, 10:06 AM) *
I'm wondering on a name for it...
Prepare yourselves: the Quackmire of Duck Bay!

(He ducks, expecting to have ruffled many feathers...)

[For non-native Englishers out there, quackmire = quagmire + quack (the sound an English duck makes!)]

Seriously, though, at least some of the other wheels seem to be on pretty firm ground (right rear especially). And it won't take too many 10cm drives to get completely back on firm ground. But this certainly raises questions about getting to the base of the cliff...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Apr 13 2008, 10:41 PM
Post #74


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Nice detail visible, even from this far away...

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aussie
post Apr 14 2008, 03:13 AM
Post #75


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 144
Joined: 17-July 07
From: Canberra Australia
Member No.: 2865



QUOTE (fredk @ Apr 13 2008, 04:47 PM) *
But this certainly raises questions about getting to the base of the cliff...


Quackmire. I think that will stick.

But the question is raises is not about access th the cliff, but rather why they chose to drive back across the excavated holes instead of around them. Or did they intend to go back to do an MI on the scuff and overshot through miscalculation of the slippage going downhill compared to the initial uphill withdrawal drive?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

19 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 07:19 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.