IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

35 Pages V  « < 27 28 29 30 31 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
MSL at Rocknest, First scoop samples - sols 57-101
walfy
post Nov 8 2012, 08:12 AM
Post #421


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 404
Joined: 5-January 10
Member No.: 5161



Nice one from MAHLI, Sol 89, even more into the sand:

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zelenyikot
post Nov 8 2012, 12:14 PM
Post #422


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 215
Joined: 23-October 12
From: Russia
Member No.: 6725



QUOTE (fredk @ Nov 7 2012, 08:22 PM) *
It was far enough to change the view of the rock from that of your sol59 to your sol86 images.

Though you are right. I was misled by distortion on a Chem cam shot from for changes of the plane of a stone.

P.S. Anaglifs for sol 88, 86-90 (large size 1,8 mb) and chem cam image for sol 91

Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
Attached Image
 


--------------------
My blog on Patreon
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zelenyikot
post Nov 9 2012, 01:33 AM
Post #423


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 215
Joined: 23-October 12
From: Russia
Member No.: 6725



Wow, Melting?


Colored Chem cam for sol 72 and 88
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
Attached Image

Attached Image
 


--------------------
My blog on Patreon
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Nov 9 2012, 02:38 AM
Post #424


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10146
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



The limited activity recently is explained here:

http://astrogeology.usgs.gov/news/item/sol...rking-from-home

I am so ready for another drive! Or even the next (and last) scoop.

Phil



--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ronald
post Nov 9 2012, 11:40 AM
Post #425


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 154
Joined: 19-September 12
Member No.: 6658



small 3x1 (maybe partial) Sol 87 pan:
Attached Image

I did enhance contrast so the colors might be off.
Same region was shooted at Sol 64 but with other lighting.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vikingmars
post Nov 9 2012, 04:34 PM
Post #426


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1081
Joined: 19-February 05
From: Close to Meudon Observatory in France
Member No.: 172



Are there some stars visible in this picture ?
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/ms...1000D1_DXXX.jpg
Could our UMSF astronomers help, please ?
Herebelow with some stretch... Enjoy ! smile.gif
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
akuo
post Nov 9 2012, 04:38 PM
Post #427


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 470
Joined: 24-March 04
From: Finland
Member No.: 63



No, since if you look at other images taken at around that time, there was a image of the sun taken with the solar filter within 30 minutes of that one.
The brighter pixels would be hot pixels.


--------------------
Antti Kuosmanen
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Nov 9 2012, 04:43 PM
Post #428


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



Via Twitter, it seems that sol 92 would have been a restricted sol but wound up a runout sol.
QUOTE
@marstimrdad: sol 92 rover wakeup song: "Running Down the Dream"-Tom Petty-it's a runout sol...- #MSL @MarsCuriosity @tweetsoutloud

@elakdawalla: Now that @MarsCuriosity mission is on Earth time, some sols have to be planned 2 days in advance. Sol 92 is one of those, a "runout sol."

@nivnac: @elakdawalla Do you mean "Restricted sol" or is 92 really a runout?

@elakdawalla: @nivnac .@marstimrdad called it a "Runout sol" but I think you're right "restricted sol" is what was meant. But now I'm not sure.

@earthrover_sw: @nivnac @elakdawalla It turned out to be both due to a minor problem discovered that caused us to not send commands (thus a runout sol)


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ant103
post Nov 9 2012, 05:00 PM
Post #429


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1619
Joined: 12-February 06
From: Bergerac - FR
Member No.: 678



Yeah, there is no stars there, just hot pixels. I didn't recognize any constellation, and also, on each frame, this bright spots appear to be at the exact same place. so it's an artifact of the sensor.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Nov 9 2012, 05:46 PM
Post #430


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (vikingmars @ Nov 9 2012, 05:34 PM) *
Are there some stars visible in this picture ?

You can easily see that this is a daylight image by checking Joe's msl image site. That shows the image was taken at 15:30 local time.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greenish
post Nov 9 2012, 06:14 PM
Post #431


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 219
Joined: 14-November 11
From: Washington, DC
Member No.: 6237



QUOTE (ronald @ Nov 9 2012, 07:40 AM) *
small 3x1 (maybe partial) Sol 87 pan:

Here is the same area imaged on Sol 71 in false color L632 (same as MER R721), contrast enhanced.
Attached Image


[Edited, forgot image credit]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greenish
post Nov 9 2012, 06:36 PM
Post #432


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 219
Joined: 14-November 11
From: Washington, DC
Member No.: 6237



And the MR image, in R312 (similar to MER 257) again contrast enhanced.
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Nov 9 2012, 08:03 PM
Post #433


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10146
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



At last! Sol 93 and we got scoop 5.

Phil

http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/pr...NCAM00326M_.JPG


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zelenyikot
post Nov 9 2012, 09:15 PM
Post #434


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 215
Joined: 23-October 12
From: Russia
Member No.: 6725



Yeeey We will drive soon rolleyes.gif

Changes in the soil in ten sols (74-84)
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
Attached Image
 


--------------------
My blog on Patreon
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Nov 11 2012, 12:44 PM
Post #435


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2817
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



Sol 88-93

Some NLA images stitched together.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

35 Pages V  « < 27 28 29 30 31 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th April 2024 - 11:54 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.