IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

8 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 8 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Voyager and Galileo Images of Ganymede, The Ganymede images and mosaics thread
EDG
post Oct 20 2010, 05:52 PM
Post #76


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 74
Joined: 9-October 10
From: Victoria, BC
Member No.: 5483



QUOTE (tedstryk @ Oct 20 2010, 10:20 AM) *
Cool. That looks like the set I used in this one.

[attachment=22801:gancol1fvoyager1.jpg]


Very nice! What filters did you use for that? I thought I'd used all the available images in those filters in mine, but maybe I ran out of steam and missed a few.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Oct 20 2010, 06:20 PM
Post #77


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



EDG, any idea why you have color shifting in the 3-color footprints near the terminator? It looks to me the green and blue filters are darker there than their neighboring footprints, causing some reddening there. For fun I tried coaxing your O+UV color near the left limb to the OGB in the center and I can get them to match more closely than the actual OGB footprints agree.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
EDG
post Oct 20 2010, 06:47 PM
Post #78


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 74
Joined: 9-October 10
From: Victoria, BC
Member No.: 5483



QUOTE (ugordan @ Oct 20 2010, 10:20 AM) *
EDG, any idea why you have color shifting in the 3-color footprints near the terminator? It looks to me the green and blue filters are darker there than their neighboring footprints, causing some reddening there. For fun I tried coaxing your O+UV color near the left limb to the OGB in the center and I can get them to match more closely than the actual OGB footprints agree.


Are you referring to what looks like some of the component images near the terminator being different brightness/contrast to the others? (e.g. the voyager image on the bottom right of the green mosaic looks darker than the surrounding images)? I'm not sure why that's like that - I think the images might not have been calibrated properly relative to eachother? I'll see if I can find my scripts for this one and see if there's any clue to what's going on in there.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Oct 20 2010, 06:51 PM
Post #79


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (EDG @ Oct 20 2010, 08:47 PM) *
Are you referring to what looks like some of the component images near the terminator being different brightness/contrast to the others?

Yes. I assume all the frames were taken at roughly the same time so the terrain illumination as well as phase angle are pretty much constant? It looks like a calibration thing. I guess I didn't expect to see that much calibration uncertainty with ISIS, although I've never really worked with it or Voyager images in general.

See the red strip near the terminator and a yellow-green bit below it - the part of the terminator that looks ok is a synthetic red channel.

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Oct 20 2010, 07:27 PM
Post #80


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



I am trying to find my notes...I did that image three or four years ago. I'm pretty sure I used OG(B+UV) where I could. Where I couldn't, I used whatever was available and shifted it to match the color in wide angle shots.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
EDG
post Oct 20 2010, 08:34 PM
Post #81


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 74
Joined: 9-October 10
From: Victoria, BC
Member No.: 5483



QUOTE (ugordan @ Oct 20 2010, 11:51 AM) *
Yes. I assume all the frames were taken at roughly the same time so the terrain illumination as well as phase angle are pretty much constant? It looks like a calibration thing. I guess I didn't expect to see that much calibration uncertainty with ISIS, although I've never really worked with it or Voyager images in general.

See the red strip near the terminator and a yellow-green bit below it - the part of the terminator that looks ok is a synthetic red channel.

Attached Image


Yeah, I see that... I wonder if Ted ran into the same issue when he made his mosaic? I don't see the same problem in his image. I'm still looking for my script for this one, maybe that'll reveal an explanation.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Oct 20 2010, 08:37 PM
Post #82


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



I didn't notice that problem.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Oct 21 2010, 01:44 AM
Post #83


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



Here is my latest version of Galileo's E6 mosaic (with help from other orbits).

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Oct 21 2010, 03:29 AM
Post #84


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



That is lovely. Is the shift from reddish tones to more gray (or more blue) colors from mid-northern latitudes to northern polar latitudes real or a result of some boundary between image coverage?


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Oct 21 2010, 03:34 AM
Post #85


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



Toward the poles, it definitely seems grayer.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
EDG
post Oct 21 2010, 05:24 AM
Post #86


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 74
Joined: 9-October 10
From: Victoria, BC
Member No.: 5483



I've found the scripts for the Voyager 1 mosaics, but they are broken down into individual filters. It also looks like I did it as a two-stage process - I have one script that updates the SPICE labels with the RAND data using spicelab, and then I have the script that makes the mosaic (which refers to the rmb file created in the first part of the process). Each filter's zipfile contains a RAND#.rmb that's already been generated. Does anyone know if this is even necessary anymore, or has the SPICE data been updated to something more accurate in the years since I did this?

So here's the scripts for each filter. The randcolour.zip file is the SPICE label updater but for all the images involved in all the filters that I use here - it just puts the updated data into a single file called RAND.rmb, instead of separate rmb files for each filter. Unfortunately I don't have a single script file that you can edit to make all the mosaics at once.

As before, I'd advise looking through these files and checking that they'll work in your system (e.g. the cd2isis command in RANDcolour.txt script refers to IMQ files mounted locally, so that won't work without being changed). You'll also have to look at the scripts to see what IMQ files you'll need (easiest way is to check the input2.txt files) And use the scripts at your own risk wink.gif.
Attached File(s)
Attached File  globalblue.zip ( 5.88K ) Number of downloads: 319
Attached File  globalgreen.zip ( 4.5K ) Number of downloads: 335
Attached File  globalorange.zip ( 4.75K ) Number of downloads: 349
Attached File  globalUV.zip ( 3.8K ) Number of downloads: 333
Attached File  globalviolet.zip ( 5.9K ) Number of downloads: 319
Attached File  randcolour.zip ( 6.31K ) Number of downloads: 358
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Oct 21 2010, 07:41 AM
Post #87


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



It's supposed to be an irradiation thing - the boundaries roughly match the latitude where magnetic field lines transition from closed (equatorial region) to open (polar) so charged particles can spiral down there and pepper the surface. Or so I've read.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DrShank
post Oct 21 2010, 01:17 PM
Post #88


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 207
Joined: 6-March 07
From: houston, texas
Member No.: 1828



thats right, those are the aggregate effects of small scale deposits within the two polar caps. well documented. also very visible in the Atlas in global views and at high resolution, where it is seen as pole-facing bright deposits

Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Oct 21 2010, 08:30 PM
Post #89


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



Here is an alternate color mix.

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Oct 21 2010, 10:35 PM
Post #90


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



Titan has veiled wonders and Io suppurates, but to my eye from a distance Ganymede is just the most beautiful moon in the solar system. Thanks to all for the magnificent images.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

8 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 8 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 09:45 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.