LauncherOne, proposed new microsat launcher |
![]() ![]() |
LauncherOne, proposed new microsat launcher |
Feb 19 2009, 01:56 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 642 Joined: 23-December 05 From: Forest of Dean Member No.: 617 |
The Register has a story linking to a Flight International piece describing a proposed new microsat launcher for payloads up to 200kg. The concept is something like a Pegasus stage, launched from the White Knight Two Virgin / Scaled Composites mothership. I can't help speculating about the cost of a nanosat launch via this method...
-------------------- --
Viva software libre! |
|
|
|
Feb 19 2009, 02:53 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 13246 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
SSTL have already been on record about the ability to get a high res orbing asset built and launched for <$5M - which would be remarkable.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7862827.stm Doug |
|
|
|
Feb 19 2009, 03:09 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2606 Joined: 10-November 06 From: Pasadena, CA Member No.: 1345 |
The key quote from the BBC article is that the launch cost target was $1 M dollars:
"What we are targeting is to see if we can do this for a million dollars" For perspective, the Cosmos 1 satellite had a mass of 100 kg. -------------------- Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
|
|
|
|
Feb 20 2009, 01:18 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1008 Joined: 29-November 05 From: Seattle, WA, USA Member No.: 590 |
Just for comparison, I see the Falcon 1e is a bit over 1,000 kg to LEO for a bit under $10M.
http://spacex.com/falcon1.php --Greg |
|
|
|
Feb 22 2009, 05:44 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 44 Joined: 13-February 06 From: Brisbane, Australia Member No.: 679 |
200 kg at $1 M is $5,000/kg which is CHEAP for a small-sat launcher. Would be nice to see them rattle the space access cage a bit by demonstrating a rapid turn-around or readiness potential for their proposed system. The USAF has been chasing rapid deployment for years and is still not getting any joy from the current launch service providers.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 08:56 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here. |
|