IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V  « < 2 3 4  
Closed TopicStart new topic
Small Body Grooves, Theories for the formation of grooves on Lutetia and Phobos
AndyG
post Jul 24 2010, 10:44 AM
Post #46


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 593
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 279



They'd be "straight" - well, great circles/great circle arcs - at the "impact equator" measured halfway between the impact point and the anti-impact point.

Hmmm...If your idea were right, there could be all sorts of interference patterns developing from a shook-up rubble pile following an impact. (I'm reminded of the wonderful phrase that the Moon "rang like a bell for hours" after Apollo hardware impacts).

Definitely a job for computer modelling, this.

Andy
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bk_2
post Aug 17 2010, 08:23 AM
Post #47


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 22
Joined: 8-March 10
Member No.: 5252



The Cassini image of the crater Penelope on Saturn's moon Tethys, from the recent flyby of three moons, Enceladus, Tethys and Dione, shows grooves crossing the lighted rim and within the walls. The crater is ~90Km across, the grooves look wider than those on Phobos, but they have the same characteristic family grouping, in at least one place. And there are a few curved grooves, the best long groove on the crater floor is one of them. The ring-whacker hypothesis predicts that the locus of each of these is in a plane.



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_cassioli_*
post Aug 31 2010, 08:52 PM
Post #48





Guests






This cool picture from our moon could possibly suggest an alternate explanation for Lutetia and Phobos trails:


Compare it with trails in this picture:


Rolling stones both and our moon, Mars moons and Lutetia?

Could a low-mass object like a moon or an asteroid cause such a "light" impact that material coming from crater, rather than being thrown away, just starts rolling around the body? huh.gif

But, again, I don't know where rocks would be right now...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
algorimancer
post Sep 1 2010, 05:55 PM
Post #49


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 656
Joined: 20-April 05
From: League City, Texas
Member No.: 285



QUOTE (cassioli @ Aug 31 2010, 02:52 PM) *
...
Rolling stones both and our moon, Mars moons and Lutetia?
...

I like this idea, with caveats. I wouldn't rule it out in all cases, but the neat parallel rows makes me think it unlikely.

Phobos is just really weird. Those grooves appear to slice through the moon, even through deep craters, and they intersect at arbitrary angles. There's no way I can envision those grooves as fractures, and the only way I could realistically see them forming is for Phobos to have had a few transits of a very thin ring about Mars. A ring around Phobos itself couldn't have created these grooves. And I find it hard to believe that a ring around Mars would be that thin.

It's almost like there are clouds of oriented strings of particles which occasionally intersect asteroids. Here's a way-out notion... perhaps nickel-iron asteroids with residual magnetic fields are able to maintain clouds of particles aligned along the magnetic field lines, perhaps with the assistance of electrostatic levitation (which has been observed on the Moon). I could envision a near-pass or impact from such a system onto an asteroid yielding something like what we see on Phobos. Modeling such a system is beyond me, but if they're in the asteroid belt they should be detectable by remote sensing or transits. There would presumably be an optimal combination of mass and magnetic field strength to create such a system. Alternately, perhaps such a system can be temporarily generated by the combination of induced magnetism and debris due to an impact, such that the resulting grooves are the result of the decay of the magnetic field dropping the suspended debris onto the surface.

[edit](These last couple of posts should probably be in the Small Body Grooves section)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_cassioli_*
post Sep 1 2010, 06:31 PM
Post #50





Guests






what happened to last posts?!?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Sep 1 2010, 06:34 PM
Post #51


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (cassioli @ Sep 1 2010, 02:31 PM) *
what happened to last posts?!?

Are these the ones? Moved to the "Small Body Grooves" thread.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_cassioli_*
post Sep 1 2010, 06:41 PM
Post #52





Guests






QUOTE (centsworth_II @ Sep 1 2010, 07:34 PM) *
Are these the ones? Moved to the "Small Body Grooves" thread.

without any warning?
this forum is magic! laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bk_2
post Sep 6 2010, 10:02 AM
Post #53


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 22
Joined: 8-March 10
Member No.: 5252



The grooves left by the rolling boulders on the moon are superficially similar to the grooves on Phobos, but they are recognizably different. For starters, there are no boulders at the ends of the grooves on Phobos, nor are there families of parallel grooves among the boulder tracks on the moon.

Algorimancer, you see the grooves as I do, the result of "a few transits of a very thin ring about Mars". But then you say you think such a thin ring improbable. Why? Saturn' rings are 10m thick across most of the extent. There are irregularities, collections of bigger boulders and wiggles on the edges caused by resonance with shepherd moons, shown so clearly at the recent equinox. If the putative (and now absent) rings of Mars were like that, you would expect the variety in the grooves we see on Phobos, from crater chains to smooth trenches.




Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hungry4info
post Sep 6 2010, 10:45 AM
Post #54


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1417
Joined: 26-July 08
Member No.: 4270



You cannot argue that a thin ring will produce a thin line of craters without requiring the moon's orbit to be coplanar with the ring. Otherwise, when the moon impacts the ring, it does not just transit it, it's blanketed by the ring. An entire hemisphere gets hit.

Another problem is that unless the body is in a high eccentric orbit, the ring particles...


wait....

I've already mentioned all this.

I'm done with this thread.


--------------------
-- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fran Ontanaya
post Sep 6 2010, 01:25 PM
Post #55


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 293
Joined: 22-September 08
From: Spain
Member No.: 4350



QUOTE (bk_2 @ Sep 6 2010, 11:02 AM) *
For starters, there are no boulders at the ends of the grooves on Phobos,


Hi.

How close should Phobos have orbited in order for Mars gravity to make one loose rock do suborbital jumps? Maybe it eventually broke apart, or reached escape velocity.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Sep 6 2010, 07:46 PM
Post #56


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



The Admin team has concluded that we've whipped this horse long enough and it doesn't appear to be going anywhere. This discussion is now closed.

If and when a published paper or other reputable study provides something new on these features, then a new topic can be started.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  « < 2 3 4
Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 12:09 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.