IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

MRO in glitch mode
PDP8E
post Feb 26 2009, 07:17 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 808
Joined: 10-October 06
From: Maynard Mass USA
Member No.: 1241



Mars Orbiter Glitch Stalls Red Planet Science
By Tariq Malik
Senior Editor
posted: 26 February 2009
10:18 am ET



http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/09022...alfunction.html


--------------------
CLA CLL
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 23)
Guest_Zvezdichko_*
post Mar 5 2009, 10:43 AM
Post #2





Guests






http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/content/news.shtml

According to Novosti Kosmonavtiki (a very serious website), MRO now working normally.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Mar 5 2009, 11:37 AM
Post #3


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



According to NASA ( a very serious space agency ) it's out of safe mode as well

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/MRO/news/mro-20090303.html

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Zvezdichko_*
post Mar 5 2009, 12:09 PM
Post #4





Guests






QUOTE
According to NASA ( a very serious space agency )


Was that needed?

And yes, Novosti Kosmonavtiki is a credible source
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Mar 5 2009, 01:39 PM
Post #5


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



MRO in normal ops is good news.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mps
post Mar 5 2009, 05:33 PM
Post #6


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 118
Joined: 18-November 07
Member No.: 3964



Zvezdichko, I think the point was that we all know about Novosti Kosmonavtiki being a very credible source wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Zvezdichko_*
post Aug 8 2009, 08:13 AM
Post #7





Guests






Uh?

http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/09080...er-revived.html

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tuvas
post Sep 1 2009, 01:10 PM
Post #8


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 428
Joined: 21-August 06
From: Northern Virginia
Member No.: 1062



From what I can tell, MRO is in a pretty serious safe mode at this time, with no hope to get out of it anytime in the short term future. It's been in Safe mode for a week, and likely will continue for another week or so. It's also somewhat compounded by fires in the JPL area. The good news is, the MRO science teams will actually get to spend an extended weekend, taking it off for Labor Day.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Zvezdichko_*
post Sep 1 2009, 03:29 PM
Post #9





Guests






Hm. Source?

Or are you the source because you are (may be) involved in the project?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marz
post Sep 1 2009, 06:14 PM
Post #10


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 311
Joined: 31-August 05
From: Florida & Texas, USA
Member No.: 482



QUOTE (Zvezdichko @ Sep 1 2009, 10:29 AM) *
Hm. Source?

Or are you the source because you are (may be) involved in the project?


Here's the MRO's press release about the Safe Mode spazz:

http://marsprogram.jpl.nasa.gov/mro/newsro.../20090828a.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tuvas
post Sep 2 2009, 12:45 AM
Post #11


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 428
Joined: 21-August 06
From: Northern Virginia
Member No.: 1062



QUOTE (Marz @ Sep 1 2009, 11:14 AM) *
Here's the MRO's press release about the Safe Mode spazz:

http://marsprogram.jpl.nasa.gov/mro/newsro.../20090828a.html


I re-read my post, and realized I was somewhat pessimistic... All instruments are working on MRO, but this is the most serious safing event so far, or at least, they are worried more about it due to the frequency of the events... Just like Spirit being stuck right now, the engineers are taking it slow to make sure there isn't anything seriously wrong... It shouldn't be months before it's back to full operations, but if it was a normal event, it would already be over. Give it a week or two, and a bit of luck, and it'll be on. I only meant to say it was a bit more serious than previous events, that's all.

Oh, I should also say, JPL is opened fully, guess I was getting an older source of news saying it was closed temporarily... Sigh.

As for sources, well, there bits and pieces from several spots, here's a few http://twitter.com/#search?q=%23HiTwycle
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2009-133
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tuvas
post Sep 4 2009, 09:04 PM
Post #12


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 428
Joined: 21-August 06
From: Northern Virginia
Member No.: 1062



http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/09090...tch-update.html

States that the orbiter will remain in safe mode for weeks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Nov 8 2009, 07:41 AM
Post #13





Guests






Mixed news I think

http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0911/07mro/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
briv1016
post Nov 8 2009, 07:56 AM
Post #14


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 239
Joined: 18-December 07
From: New York
Member No.: 3982



Should we be reading into this:

QUOTE
Once the probe its given a clean bill of health, it will restart science observations and play a larger role as a communications relay station for NASA's Spirit and Opportunity rovers.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Nov 8 2009, 10:33 AM
Post #15


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



It's fairly clear - there's no 'reading into' requried. It make far more sense to schedule downlink via MRO.

It frees up MODY (as it's downlink is much lower than MRO)
It''s an accounting error in terms of MRO downlink
It's going to be on the ground faster with MRO
Thus it opens up a bit of extra sequence planning time.

DOWNSIDE - the passes are earlier in the afternoon, so less time for rover activities before stopping for the day. (But part of me wonders why they can't just start earlier - the generated power during the day will still be the same - maybe it's a heater requirement thing starting too early)

Comparing http://descanso.jpl.nasa.gov/DPSummary/odyssey_telecom.pdf and http://descanso.jpl.nasa.gov/DPSummary/MRO_092106.pdf

MODY is between 28,440 b/s and 110,600 b/s for 70-m passes, and between 3,950 b/s and 110,600 b/s for 34-m passes.

MRO starts at 500kbps on 34-m passes at the furthest distance from Earth - and goes up to 2.6Mbps on 34 and 6Mbps on 70-m at closest approach.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Nov 8 2009, 11:17 AM
Post #16


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



The fix sounds reasonable--stretching out the response time to prevent the fault protection system from triggering a reset from what are presumed to be very transient alarms. They're proceeding with extremely prudent caution & diligence, though.

'Desensitizing' an FPS response must be done with great care just in case this transient condition isn't behaving precisely as they think it is based on ground modeling. Gotta be pretty confident that allowing the condition to persist longer won't do real damage (possibly in unexpected ways) before making such a change.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
briv1016
post Nov 8 2009, 12:16 PM
Post #17


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 239
Joined: 18-December 07
From: New York
Member No.: 3982



But is MRO's time better spent optimized for pure science instead of both science and relay?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Nov 8 2009, 03:12 PM
Post #18


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



MRO doing relay is a much much smaller impact on MRO, than Odyssey doing relay is an impact on Odyssey. Relay on Odyssey could take a couple of hours out of every day for downlink. (a 15 minutes 128 kbps pass can take a long time at 33kbps to downlink )

At worst - it's a couple of minutes for MRO.

In terms of total science done - there's less loss by asking MRO to do it. It's a BIT impact on Odysseys downlink budget - it's an accounting error for MRO.

And of course - there's science value IN the relay itself - i.e. the data returned from the rovers.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
briv1016
post Nov 8 2009, 04:38 PM
Post #19


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 239
Joined: 18-December 07
From: New York
Member No.: 3982



It comes down to the value of time on each spacecraft. Have we finally reached a tipping point that "x" amount of time on MRO is less valuable then "x+n" amount of time on Odyssey?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Nov 8 2009, 05:09 PM
Post #20


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



It's the impact for downlink that's massively, the dominant force here. It's a double digit percentage hit on Mars Odyssey's downlink to do MER. It's less than a single digit on MRO.

It's not time - it's data volume.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
briv1016
post Nov 25 2009, 10:25 PM
Post #21


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 239
Joined: 18-December 07
From: New York
Member No.: 3982



Team Plans Uplink of Protective Files

http://marsprogram.jpl.nasa.gov/mro/newsro.../20091124a.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Dec 8 2009, 08:17 PM
Post #22


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Via @HiCommander

QUOTE
MRO is out of safe mode. Instruments, including #HiRISE, still safed for a short while longer.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
machi
post Dec 17 2009, 05:01 PM
Post #23


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 796
Joined: 27-February 08
From: Heart of Europe
Member No.: 4057



MRO is back!
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/MRO/news/mro20091216.html


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Dec 23 2009, 10:18 PM
Post #24


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2516
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



The MARCI weather reports are back.

http://www.msss.com/msss_images/latest_weather.html


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th May 2024 - 10:59 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.