KBO encounters |
KBO encounters |
May 23 2016, 05:13 PM
Post
#376
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
... Real interesting thing is whether they can be synchronized, like the VLA, as a synthetic aperture array. Would be really interesting to have a 10 telescope array functioning as a 13 million meter telescope. This would require to combine them as an interferometer. This means essentially redirecting the light of the telescopes to a common instrument. At least within my limited knowledge, that's currently not technically feasible over thousands of km in the optical range of wavelengths. |
|
|
Jul 5 2016, 06:15 PM
Post
#377
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 282 Joined: 18-June 04 Member No.: 84 |
http://phys.org/news/2016-04-pluto-horizon...lt-journey.html
QUOTE The new mission is on target for a Jan. 1, 2019, flyby of Kuiper Belt Object 2014 MU69, but that is one of many, said Stern. New Horizons spacecraft could visit 20 different Kuiper Belt Objects. The spacecraft is currently healthy and has enough power for 20 years, he added. |
|
|
Jul 5 2016, 06:25 PM
Post
#378
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
I suspect that's a misunderstanding of the intent to study phase functions of 20 Kuiper belt objects from afar, during the cruise, not to "visit" them in the sense of doing flybys.
-------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Jul 5 2016, 06:58 PM
Post
#379
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 529 Joined: 19-February 05 Member No.: 173 |
I suspect that's a misunderstanding of the intent to study phase functions of 20 Kuiper belt objects from afar, during the cruise, not to "visit" them in the sense of doing flybys. We will do much more than just phase curves-- also lightcurves, shapes, ring searches, possibly even atmospheric searches using stellar occultations, but we won't be close enough to resolve any except MU69. As to that target though, we will come closer and plan to do much higher resolution imaging than we did at Pluto. |
|
|
Jul 7 2016, 03:07 PM
Post
#380
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 495 Joined: 12-February 12 Member No.: 6336 |
Thank you for the clearification Alan.
And yes there's at least one small object with a ring, Chariklo - a double one. So it rings might be well worth looking for. |
|
|
Jul 8 2016, 09:38 PM
Post
#381
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 121 Joined: 26-June 04 From: Austria Member No.: 89 |
|
|
|
Dec 23 2016, 04:36 AM
Post
#382
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 204 Joined: 14-April 06 From: Seattle, WA Member No.: 745 |
|
|
|
Feb 1 2017, 08:51 PM
Post
#383
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2073 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
Another TCM completed! https://www.nasa.gov/feature/new-horizons-r...-for-next-flyby
|
|
|
Apr 4 2017, 04:18 AM
Post
#384
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2073 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
Halfway there:
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/new-horizons-h...xt-flyby-target Images taken of where MU69 should be but its still invisible... |
|
|
Apr 6 2017, 03:22 PM
Post
#385
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 22 Joined: 3-January 07 Member No.: 1551 |
Halfway there: https://www.nasa.gov/feature/new-horizons-h...xt-flyby-target Images taken of where MU69 should be but its still invisible... The image runs without trouble through astrometry.net; scale is 1.06 arc-seconds per pixel, it's in northern Sagittarius (18 18 49 -20 53 13) http://nova.astrometry.net/user_images/1573114#annotated The fuzzy blob in the top right corner is a reflection nebula, so an honest fuzzy blob on the sky; the optical portion doesn't seem to have a name, the nebula is much more obvious in infra-red (use sky.esa.int and the 2MASS sky) |
|
|
Jun 2 2017, 12:08 PM
Post
#386
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 529 Joined: 19-February 05 Member No.: 173 |
The first of the three stellar occultation of MU69 and its Hill Sphere is tonight. We've got over 50 telescopes-- half fixed assets, half mobile in South America and South Africa. Prime objective: probe for rings, debris, moons. Secondary objective: Get a physical size constraint on MU69!
|
|
|
Jun 2 2017, 08:49 PM
Post
#387
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2530 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 321 |
Very exciting, Alan! That dense star field of the Milky Way in the background is paying off!
|
|
|
Jun 2 2017, 11:22 PM
Post
#388
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2073 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
Agreed. To see an outline of an object a year and a half before closest approach (and over 40 AU away from the Earth!) is nothing short of amazing. The mission just keeps setting records...
|
|
|
Jun 7 2017, 08:33 PM
Post
#389
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1578 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Vermont Member No.: 530 |
Sounds like there were clear skies and data was gathered on both continents. I have not found any other teasers about success or results, though... anyone else?
|
|
|
Jun 8 2017, 07:40 PM
Post
#390
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2530 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 321 |
According to comments on Twitter, data collection was successful, but the analysis will take weeks. My takeaway from that is that:
1) There's a low signal-to-noise per observation. 2) They'll want to embargo any readings fresh off someone's computer terminal until they can make a coherent statement. To comment further, the duration of the occultation was expected to be quite brief. In that case, any given observation with a single instrument would be very noisy due to variability in the Earth's atmosphere, AKA "seeing" -> the reason why stars twinkle. Even a bright star can vary dramatically in apparent brightness as air lenses the star's light in complex, shifting ways. In a case like an MU69 occultation, it could be that no single telescope can produce a clear detection/nondetection, but a set of telescopes can. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 29th March 2024 - 09:52 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |