IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V  « < 2 3 4  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Juno, perijove 10, December 16, 2017
Gerald
post Jan 1 2018, 08:16 PM
Post #46


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1975
Joined: 7-December 12
Member No.: 6780



Thanks, AviSolo!
The vast majority of the merits ought to go to the many people working in the background, who make all this possible!
A happy and successful year 2018 to all of you!

I'm also looking forward to the creativity of the image processing community, which will contribute to the capabilities of all of us.
Björn's blue sky is a first interesting item to add; thus far, I've obtained similar results only unintentionally, when I worked slightly inaccurately.

---

In the meanwhile, most of the relevant still images of the (somewhat preliminary) PJ-10 flyby movie are online (the site of 2017-12-22 is updated).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bjorn Jonsson
post Jan 3 2018, 10:50 PM
Post #47


IMG to PNG GOD
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 1929
Joined: 19-February 04
From: Near fire and ice
Member No.: 38



QUOTE (Gerald @ Jan 1 2018, 08:16 PM) *
I'm also looking forward to the creativity of the image processing community, which will contribute to the capabilities of all of us.
Björn's blue sky is a first interesting item to add; thus far, I've obtained similar results only unintentionally, when I worked slightly inaccurately.

In a way, what I did was 'intentionally inaccurate'. I simply increased Jupiter's radii by 200 km when reprojecting the framelets to simple cylindrical projection and also when rendering the images. By doing this I don't lose the fuzzy/hazy limb visible in the original framelets. This requires very accurate pointing information and a very accurate value for the interframe delay, otherwise you 'lose' the blue sky at the southern and/or northern limb or you get incorrect color at the limb.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bjorn Jonsson
post Jan 3 2018, 10:58 PM
Post #48


IMG to PNG GOD
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 1929
Joined: 19-February 04
From: Near fire and ice
Member No.: 38



And here are my versions of the PJ10_024 image (North North Temperate Belt) in approximately true color/contrast and in enhanced color, contrast and sharpness. Image PJ10_024 is centered near latitude 40 degrees north; this area has been especially photogenic in the JunoCam images.

Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image

Attached Image

Attached Image
Attached Image


These images do not include a bluish/fuzzy/hazy limb because I started working on them before I started my (successful) experiments involving the limb.

Metadata:

IMAGE_TIME = 2017-12-16T17:47:51.438
MISSION_PHASE_NAME = PERIJOVE 10
PRODUCT_ID = JNCE_2017350_10C00024_V01
SPACECRAFT_ALTITUDE = 8786.9
SPACECRAFT_NAME = JUNO
SUB_SPACECRAFT_LATITUDE = 38.3574
SUB_SPACECRAFT_LONGITUDE = 287.7498
TITLE = North North Temperate Belt
Resolution at nadir: ~5.9 km/pixel
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tolis
post Jan 4 2018, 06:19 PM
Post #49


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 113
Joined: 18-June 08
Member No.: 4216



QUOTE (Bjorn Jonsson @ Jan 3 2018, 11:58 PM) *
And here are my versions of the PJ10_024 image (North North Temperate Belt) in approximately true color/contrast and in enhanced color, contrast and sharpness. Image PJ10_024 is centered near latitude 40 degrees north; this area has been especially photogenic in the JunoCam images.


The round, bluish feature with the dark centre in frame #24 reminds me of the SL-9 impact scars back in 1994.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gerald
post Jan 4 2018, 10:15 PM
Post #50


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1975
Joined: 7-December 12
Member No.: 6780



In his recent, first PJ-10 report, John Rogers (BAA) suggested, that these dark patches might be soot as a result of lighting activity in thunderstorms.

Here a heavily enhanced version of a still of my prelimnary PJ-10 flyby animation:
Attached Image

(I think, that I should upload this to missionjuno.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sean
post Jan 12 2018, 09:41 PM
Post #51


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 522
Joined: 10-November 15
Member No.: 7837



Here is my take on Gerald's PJ10_034...






--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  « < 2 3 4
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th January 2018 - 09:43 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.