MSL landing site: Gale Crater |
MSL landing site: Gale Crater |
May 19 2012, 12:07 AM
Post
#121
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Huh. The usage of "Mount Sharp" is already pretty ingrained among mission scientists. Do you think they'll make the switch? I did think it was weird that they press-released the informal name; I figured the IAU wouldn't take that too kindly.
It seems weird that they went with Aeolis Mons and Aeolis Palus. It's certainly not the only mound in Aeolis planum. But I haven't studied place-naming on Mars that closely. -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
May 19 2012, 12:24 AM
Post
#122
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10149 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
I think they will go with the official name, but maybe slip in another informal Sharp name somewhere along the way. Their right to use informal names is well established, but I expect they will adapt to the official name as well.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
May 19 2012, 02:31 AM
Post
#123
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8783 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Odd that USGS & IAU would decide to affix a formal name to these features at this time.
Also interesting is the fact that the USGS appears to state that 'Aeolis' is linked to a classical albedo feature, implying that Gale is observable from relatively small (I'd guess Lowell Observatory ca. early 1900s) Earth-based scopes? -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
May 19 2012, 02:58 AM
Post
#124
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10149 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
No, Aeolis is the region Gale is in. Gale itself is not visible, though it might have contributed to a classical canal.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
May 19 2012, 06:06 AM
Post
#125
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8783 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Got it; thanks, Phil!
Think Emily's right, though; might be a bit hard for the mission folks to shift gears at this late date. For example, bet that there are imaging sequences planned already named "SHARP_SOMETHING". -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
May 19 2012, 06:18 AM
Post
#126
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14431 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Got to say - this is a very silly move by the IAU.
|
|
|
May 19 2012, 07:14 AM
Post
#127
|
||
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
Sounds like someone in the IAU has thrown his or her rattle out of the pram, narked at the way humble, low-born mission people christen places and features without the High Council's approval. I can imagine that even now, the IAU High Council are gathering in the Great IAU Hall, to discuss how to address the issue...
Well done IAU, another back of the net own goal. -------------------- |
|
|
||
May 19 2012, 08:06 AM
Post
#128
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14431 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
It's disrespectful to the team that's put in the years of work who are about to explore it and most of all, disrespectful to Bob Sharp.
|
|
|
May 19 2012, 10:51 AM
Post
#129
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10149 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Sharp gets a crater nearby. By convention large Mars craters are named after people and mountains after the region they are in. This follows the convention. And there is no conflict between informal mission names and official ones. Indeed there would be nothing wrong with the MSL team continuing to use their own name informally, but I expect they will just port the name Sharp to another feature.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
May 19 2012, 11:09 PM
Post
#130
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2511 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
It's worth pointing out that unlike decisions like what defines a planet, nomenclature issues for planetary features are managed by a task group of planetary scientists: see http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/Page/Approved
Still seems odd but as Phil points out naming a raised feature after a person just wasn't going to fit with the existing nomenclature convention. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
May 19 2012, 11:11 PM
Post
#131
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14431 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
The IAU could have just done nothing. What they've done is make this now a challenging issue for the project, for media relations etc etc.
|
|
|
May 19 2012, 11:15 PM
Post
#132
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2511 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
The IAU could have just done nothing. True. Maybe there's an interesting insider politics story here. Certainly the IAU didn't feel compelled to name the Columbia Hills out from under the MER team. One can complain: "Any objections to these names based on significant, substantive problems must be forwarded in writing or email to the IAU Division III President within three months from the time the name was placed on the web site." -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
May 19 2012, 11:37 PM
Post
#133
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 808 Joined: 10-October 06 From: Maynard Mass USA Member No.: 1241 |
There are a seven named peaks in Gusev in the vicinity of Spirit.
from north to south: Anderson Hill - named after Michael P. Anderson Brown Hill - named after David M. Brown Chawla Hill - named after Kalpana Chawla Clark Hill - named after Laurel Clark Husband Hill - named after Rick D. Husband McCool Hill - named after William C. McCool Ramon Hill - named after Ilan Ramon The IAU should really take a deep breath and give some wiggle room to the people and organizations who are actually expending the resources and who will actually have a vehicle IN SITU! Its a roving laboratory ON MARS that actually plans to climb that one hill in Gale. -------------------- CLA CLL
|
|
|
May 20 2012, 12:24 AM
Post
#134
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14431 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
|
|
|
May 20 2012, 12:39 AM
Post
#135
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2511 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
There are a seven named peaks in Gusev in the vicinity of Spirit. Those names don't appear in the IAU Gazetteer and AFAIK have no standing with the IAU. Look, I'm not arguing with you guys, I agree that this was a confusing and seemingly ill-considered move. It would be interesting to get a statement from Brad Smith, the chair of the IAU Mars Task Group, about why they chose to do this now. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd April 2024 - 12:42 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |